Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Success Rate and Complications of Sharp Recanalization for Treatment of Central Venous Occlusions

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate success and safety of needle (sharp) recanalization as a method to re-establish access in patients with chronic central venous occlusions.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-nine consecutive patients who underwent this procedure were retrospectively reviewed to establish success rate and associated complications. In all cases, a 21- or 22-gauge needle was used to restore connection between two chronically occluded segments after conventional wire and catheter techniques had failed. The needle was guided toward a target placed through a separate access by fluoroscopic guidance. When successful, the procedure was completed by placing a catheter, ballooning the segment, and/or stenting.

Results

The procedure was successful in 37 of the 39 patients (95%). The vast majority of the treated lesions were in the SVC and/or right innominate vein. Occlusions ranged in length between 10 and 110 mm, and the average length of occluded venous segment was 40 mm in the treated group. There were four minor (SIR classification B) complications involving pain management after the procedure. There were two major (SIR classification D) complications both of which involved hemorrhage into the pericardium treated with covered stents (5.1%).

Conclusions

Sharp recanalization is a viable procedure for patients who have exhausted standard wire and catheter techniques. The operator performing this procedure should be familiar with potential complications so that they can be addressed urgently if needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Lumsden AB, MacDonald MJ, Isiklar H, Martin LG, Kikeri D, Harker LA, et al. Central venous stenosis in the hemodialysis patient: incidence and efficacy of endovascular treatment. Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;5:504–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kundu S. Central venous obstruction management. Semin. Interv. Radiol. 2009;26:115–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ong S, Barker-Finkel J, Allon M. Long-term outcomes of arteriovenous thigh grafts in hemodialysis patients: a comparison with tunneled dialysis catheters. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:804–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta H, Murphy TP, Soares GM. Use of a puncture needle for recanalization of an occluded right subclavian vein. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 1998;21:508–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Farrell T, Lang EV, Barnhart W. Sharp recanalization of central venous occlusions. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR. 1999;10:149–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Athreya S, Scott P, Annamalai G, Edwards R, Moss J, Robertson I. Sharp recanalization of central venous occlusions: a useful technique for haemodialysis line insertion. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:105–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goo DE, Kim YJ, Choi DL, Park SI, Yang SB, Moon C, et al. Use of a rosch-uchida needle for recanalization of refractory dialysis-related central vein occlusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1352–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Honnef D, Wingen M, Günther RW, Haage P. Sharp central venous recanalization by means of a TIPS needle. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2005;28:673–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lang EV, Vrachliotis TG, Brophy DP. Sharp recanalization for chronic central venous occlusions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;3:21–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baerlocher MO, Asch MR, Myers A. Successful recanalization of a longstanding complete left subclavian vein occlusion by radiofrequency perforation with use of a radiofrequency guide wire. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:1703–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis RM, David E, Pugash RA, Annamalai G. Radiofrequency guide wire recanalization of venous occlusions in patients with malignant superior vena cava syndrome. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2012;35:676–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guimaraes M, Schonholz C, Hannegan C, Anderson MB, Shi J, Selby B. Radiofrequency wire for the recanalization of central vein occlusions that have failed conventional endovascular techniques. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR. 2012;23:1016–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Iafrati M, Maloney S, Halin N. Radiofrequency thermal wire is a useful adjunct to treat chronic central venous occlusions. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:603–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sivananthan G, MacArthur DH, Daly KP, Allen DW, Hakham S, Halin NJ. Safety and efficacy of radiofrequency wire recanalization of chronic central venous occlusions. J Vasc Access. 2015;16:309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anil G, Taneja M. Revascularization of an occluded brachiocephalic vein using Outback-LTD re-entry catheter. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:1038–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brountzos EN, Preza O, Kelekis A, Panagiotou I, Kelekis N. Recanalization of dialysis catheter-related subclavian vein occlusion using a re-entry device: report of two patients. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2011;34:207–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khaja MS, Chick JFB, Schuman AD, Cooper KJ, Majdalany BS, Saad WE, et al. Fluoroscopic targeting of wallstents and amplatzer vascular plugs in sharp recanalization of chronic venous occlusions. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2017. doi:10.1007/s00270-017-1724-z.

    Google Scholar 

  18. El-Sabrout RA, Duncan JM. Right atrial bypass grafting for central venous obstruction associated with dialysis access: another treatment option. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:472–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Glass C, Maevsky V, Massey T, Illig K. Subclavian vein to right atrial appendage bypass without sternotomy to maintain arteriovenous access in patients with complete central vein occlusion, a new approach. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009;23:465–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murphy TP, Webb MS. Percutaneous venous bypass for refractory dialysis-related subclavian vein occlusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998;9:935–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Arabi M, Ahmed I, Mathami A, Ahmed D, Aslam N. Sharp central venous recanalization in hemodialysis patients: a single-institution experience. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2016;39:927–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emil I. Cohen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, E.I., Beck, C., Garcia, J. et al. Success Rate and Complications of Sharp Recanalization for Treatment of Central Venous Occlusions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 41, 73–79 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1787-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1787-x

Keywords

Navigation