Abstract
Purpose
To determine the rate, clinical significance, and predictors of delayed pneumothorax after CT-guided lung biopsy.
Methods
Medical and imaging records of all patients who underwent CT-guided lung biopsy between January 1, 2012, and January 9, 2015, were reviewed. “Early pneumothorax” was defined as one visualized on CT scan at the time of biopsy, “delayed pneumothorax” as one discovered on the first follow-up chest X-ray (CXR), and “clinically significant pneumothorax” as one requiring chest tube placement.
Results
Three hundred fifty-seven lung biopsies were performed; 79 patients did not have follow-up CXR and were excluded. Out of 278 cases included in the study, early pneumothorax occurred in 109 patients. Follow-up CXRs were available in the remaining 169 patients without early pneumothorax and were obtained 3.1 ± 2.9 h after biopsy. The rate of delayed pneumothorax was 8.6% (24/278). Clinically significant pneumothorax occurred in 10/24 (41.7%) patients with delayed pneumothorax, including one case of tension pneumothorax. Patients with delayed pneumothorax (n = 24) had smaller lesion long axial diameter (18.58 ± 9.84 vs 25.83 ± 17.69 mm, p = 0.005), longer intrapulmonary needle tract (23.45 ± 14.98 vs 14.17 ± 14.49, p = 0.004), and lower FEV1/FVC ratio (53.30 ± 22.47 vs 71.15 ± 13.77, p = 0.015), compared to those without delayed pneumothorax (n = 145). The length of intrapulmonary needle tract was the only independent predictor of delayed pneumothorax (p = 0.008) and symptomatic delayed pneumothorax (p = 0.019).
Conclusion
Obtaining a routine follow-up CXR in all patients after CT-guided lung biopsy appears warranted, given the high rate of delayed pneumothorax and large percentage of patients who will require a chest tube. The only independent predictor of (symptomatic) delayed pneumothorax was the length of intrapulmonary needle tract.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birchard KR. Transthoracic needle biopsy. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2011;28(1):87–97.
Boskovic T, Stanic J, Pena-Karan S, et al. Pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of lung lesions under CT guidance. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(Suppl 1):S99–107.
Byrd RP Jr, Fields-Ossorio C, Roy TM. Delayed chest radiographs and the diagnosis of pneumothorax following CT-guided fine needle aspiration of pulmonary lesions. Respir Med. 1999;93(6):379–81.
Chiappetta M, Rosella F, Dall’armi V, et al. CT-guided fine-needle ago-biopsy of pulmonary nodules: predictive factors for diagnosis and pneumothorax occurrence. La Radiologia medica. 2016;121:635–43.
Choi CM, Um SW, Yoo CG, et al. Incidence and risk factors of delayed pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung. Chest. 2004;126(5):1516–21.
Clayton JD, Elicker BM, Ordovas KG, Kohi MP, Nguyen J, Naeger DM. Nonclotted blood patch technique reduces pneumothorax and chest tube placement rates after percutaneous lung biopsies. J Thorac Imaging. 2016;31(4):243–6.
Collings CL, Westcott JL, Banson NL, Lange RC. Pneumothorax and dependent versus nondependent patient position after needle biopsy of the lung. Radiology. 1999;210(1):59–64.
Cox JE, Chiles C, McManus CM, Aquino SL, Choplin RH. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: variables that affect risk of pneumothorax. Radiology. 1999;212(1):165–8.
Dennie CJ, Matzinger FR, Marriner JR, Maziak DE. Transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung: results of early discharge in 506 outpatients. Radiology. 2001;219(1):247–51.
Despars JA, Sassoon CS, Light RW. Significance of iatrogenic pneumothoraces. Chest. 1994;105(4):1147–50.
Fish GD, Stanley JH, Miller KS, Schabel SI, Sutherland SE. Postbiopsy pneumothorax: estimating the risk by chest radiography and pulmonary function tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150(1):71–4.
Freund MC, Petersen J, Goder KC, Bunse T, Wiedermann F, Glodny B. Systemic air embolism during percutaneous core needle biopsy of the lung: frequency and risk factors. BMC Pulm Med. 2012;12:2.
Halloush RA, Khasawneh FA, Saleh HA, Soubani AO, Piskorowski TJ, Al-Abbadi MA. Fine needle aspiration cytology of lung lesions: a clinicopathological and cytopathological review of 150 cases with emphasis on the relation between the number of passes and the incidence of pneumothorax. Cytopathology. 2007;18(1):44–51.
Heck SL, Blom P, Berstad A. Accuracy and complications in computed tomography fluoroscopy-guided needle biopsies of lung masses. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(6):1387–92.
Heerink WJ, de Bock GH, de Jonge GJ, Groen HJ, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M. Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2016;27:138–48.
Hirose T, Mori K, Machida S, Tominaga K, Yokoi K, Adachi M. Computed tomographic fluoroscopy-guided transthoracic needle biopsy for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2000;30(6):259–62.
Kazerooni EA, Lim FT, Mikhail A, Martinez FJ. Risk of pneumothorax in CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of the lung. Radiology. 1996;198(2):371–5.
Khan MF, Straub R, Moghaddam SR, et al. Variables affecting the risk of pneumothorax and intrapulmonal hemorrhage in CT-guided transthoracic biopsy. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(7):1356–63.
Kim JI, Park CM, Lee SM, Goo JM. Rapid needle-out patient-rollover approach after cone beam CT-guided lung biopsy: effect on pneumothorax rate in 1191 consecutive patients. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(7):1845–53.
Klein JS, Salomon G, Stewart EA. Transthoracic needle biopsy with a coaxially placed 20-gauge automated cutting needle: results in 122 patients. Radiology. 1996;198(3):715–20.
Kuban JD, Tam AL, Huang SY, et al. The effect of needle gauge on the risk of pneumothorax and chest tube placement after percutaneous computed tomographic (CT)-guided lung biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(6):1595–602.
Laurent F, Latrabe V, Vergier B, Michel P. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of the lung: comparison between aspiration and automated cutting needles using a coaxial technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000;23(4):266–72.
MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J, Group BTSPDG. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: british thoracic society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl 2):ii18–31.
Manhire A, Charig M, Clelland C, et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax. 2003;58(11):920–36.
Ng YL, Patsios D, Roberts H, et al. CT-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules measuring 10 mm or less. Clin Radiol. 2008;63(3):272–7.
Nour-Eldin NE, Alsubhi M, Emam A, et al. Pneumothorax complicating coaxial and non-coaxial ct-guided lung biopsy: comparative analysis of determining risk factors and management of pneumothorax in a retrospective review of 650 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(2):261–70.
Richardson CM, Pointon KS, Manhire AR, Macfarlane JT. Percutaneous lung biopsies: a survey of UK practice based on 5444 biopsies. Br J Radiol. 2002;75(897):731–5.
Shantaveerappa HN, Mathai MG, Byrd RP Jr, Karnad AB, Mehta JB, Roy TM. Intervention in patients with pneumothorax immediately following CT-guided fine needle aspiration of pulmonary nodules. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8(6):CR401–4.
Traill ZC, Gleeson FV. Delayed pneumothorax after CT-guided percutaneous fine needle aspiration lung biopsy. Thorax. 1997;52(6):581–2 discussion 575-586.
Yeow KM, Su IH, Pan KT, et al. Risk factors of pneumothorax and bleeding: multivariate analysis of 660 CT-guided coaxial cutting needle lung biopsies. Chest. 2004;126(3):748–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.
Human and Animal Ethical Statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee; an IRB approval was obtained for this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taleb, S., Jalaeian, H., Frank, N. et al. Is a Routine Chest X-ray Necessary in Every Patient After Percutaneous CT-Guided Lung Biopsy? A Retrospective Review of 278 Cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40, 1415–1420 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1632-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1632-2