Skip to main content
Log in

Extrahepatic Arteries Originating from Hepatic Arteries: Analysis Using CT During Hepatic Arteriography and Visualization on Digital Subtraction Angiography

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the prevalence and site of origin of extrahepatic arteries originating from hepatic arteries on early phase CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA) was accessed. Visualization of these elements on digital subtraction hepatic angiography (DSHA) was assessed using CTHA images as a gold standard.

Materials and Methods

A total of 943 patients (mean age 66.9 ± 10.3 years; male/female, 619/324) underwent CTHA and DSHA. The prevalence and site of origin of extrahepatic arteries were accessed using CTHA and visualized using DSHA.

Results

In 924 (98.0%) patients, a total of 1555 extrahepatic branches, representing eight types, were found to originate from hepatic arteries on CTHA. CTHA indicated the following extrahepatic branch prevalence rates: right gastric artery, 890 (94.4%); falciform artery, 386 (40.9%); accessory left gastric artery, 161 (17.1%); left inferior phrenic artery (IPA), 43 (4.6%); posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery, 33 (3.5%); dorsal pancreatic artery, 26 (2.8%); duodenal artery, 12 (1.3%); and right IPA, 4 (0.4%). In addition, 383 patients (40.6%) had at least one undetectable branch on DSHA. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of visualization on DSHA were as follows: RGA, 80.0, 86.8, and 80.4%; falciform artery, 53.9, 97.7, and 80.0%; accessory LGA, 64.6, 98.6, and 92.3%; left IPA, 76.7, 99.8, and 98.7%; PSPDA, 100, 99.7, and 99.9%; dorsal pancreatic artery, 57.7, 100, and 98.8%; duodenal artery, 8.3, 99.9, and 98.7%; and right IPA, 0, 100, and 99.6%, respectively.

Conclusion

Extrahepatic arteries originating from hepatic arteries were frequently identified on CTHA images. These arteries were frequently overlooked on DSHA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Yoshikawa J, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with subsegmental transcatheter arterial embolization. Radiology. 1993;188:79–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A, Takaki H, et al. Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: radiofrequency ablation combined with chemoembolization versus hepatectomy. Radiology. 2008;247:260–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Atassi B, et al. Treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with use of 90Y microspheres (TheraSphere): safety, tumor response, and survival. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:1627–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim HC, Chung JW, Lee W, Jae HJ, Park JH. Recognizing extrahepatic collateral vessels that supply hepatocellular carcinoma to avoid complications of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Radiographics. 2005;25:S25–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirakawa M, Iida M, Aoyagi K, Matsui T, Akagi K, Fujishima M. Gastroduodenal lesions after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;83:837–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibo M, Hasuo K, Inoue A, et al. Hepatic falciform artery: angiographic observations and significance. Abdom Imaging. 2001;26:515–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. López-Benítez R, Radeleff BA, Barragán-Campos HM, et al. Acute pancreatitis after embolization of liver tumors: frequency and associated risk factors. Pancreatology. 2007;7:53–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung JW, Park JH, Han JK, Choi BI, Kim TK, Han MC. Transcatheter oily chemoembolization of the inferior phrenic artery in hepatocellular carcinoma: the safety and potential therapeutic role. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998;9:495–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ishigami K, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, et al. Accessory left gastric artery from left hepatic artery shown on MDCT and conventional angiography: correlation with CT hepatic arteriography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1002–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tajima T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, et al. Hepatic falciform ligament artery in patients with chronic liver diseases: detection on computed tomography hepatic arteriography. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:743–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burgmans MC, Too CW, Kao YH, et al. Computed tomography hepatic arteriography has a hepatic falciform artery detection rate that is much higher than that of digital subtraction angiography and 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT: implications for planning 90Y radioembolization? Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3979–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Kameyama T, et al. Benign and malignant nodules in cirrhotic livers: distinction based on blood supply. Radiology. 1991;178:493–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ueda K, Matsui O, Kawamori Y, et al. Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of hemodynamics with dynamic CT during hepatic arteriography. Radiology. 1998;206:161–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayashi M, Matsui O, Ueda K, et al. Correlation between the blood supply and grade of malignancy of hepatocellular nodules associated with liver cirrhosis: evaluation by CT during intraarterial injection of contrast medium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:969–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams DM, Cho KY, Ensminger WD, et al. Hepatic falciform artery: anatomy, angiographic appearance, and clinical significance. Radiology. 1985;156:339–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Song SY, Chung JW, Lim HG, Park JH. Nonhepatic arteries originating from the hepatic arteries: angiographic analysis in 250 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:461–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee AJ, Gomes AS, Liu DM, Kee ST, Loh CT, McWilliams JP. The road less traveled: importance of the lesser branches of the celiac axis in liver embolotherapy. Radiographics. 2012;32:1121–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu DM, Salem R, Bui JT, et al. Angiographic considerations in patients undergoing liver-directed therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:911–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gwon DI, Ko GY, Yoon HK, et al. Inferior phrenic artery: anatomy, variations, pathologic conditions, and interventional management. Radiographics. 2007;27:687–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakamura H, Uchida H, Kuroda C, et al. Accessory left gastric artery arising from left hepatic artery: angiographic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980;134:529–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. VanDamme JP, Bonte J. Vascular anatomy in abdominal surgery. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1990. p. 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibukuro K, Tsukiyama T, Mori K, Inoue Y. Hepatic falciform ligament artery: angiographic anatomy and clinical importance. Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20:367–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bertelli E, Di GF, Bertelli L, Civeli L, Mosca S. The arterial blood supply of the pancreas: a review. II. The posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery. An anatomical and radiological study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1996;18:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bertelli E, Di GF, Mosca S, Bastianini A. The arterial blood supply of the pancreas: a review. V. The dorsal pancreatic artery: an anatomic review and a radiologic study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20:445–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bianchi HF, Albanèse EF. The supraduodenal artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 1989;11:37–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sahani D, Mehta A, Blake M, Prasad S, Harris G, Saini S. Preoperative hepatic vascular evaluation with CT and MR angiography: implications for surgery. Radiographics. 2004;24:1367–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ishigaki S, Itoh S, Satake H, Ota T, Ishigaki T. CT depiction of small arteries in the pancreatic head: assessment using coronal reformatted images with 16-channel multislice CT. Abdom Imaging. 2007;32:215–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Miyayama S, Matsui O, Yamashiro M, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma by CT during arterial portography using a cone-beam CT technology: comparison with conventional CTAP. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34:502–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We deeply appreciate the support of late Prof. Masayuki Suzuki (Department of Quantum Medical Technology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan) toward our study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kumi Ozaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest and financial disclosures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozaki, K., Kobayashi, S., Matsui, O. et al. Extrahepatic Arteries Originating from Hepatic Arteries: Analysis Using CT During Hepatic Arteriography and Visualization on Digital Subtraction Angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40, 822–830 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1568-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1568-6

Keywords

Navigation