Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Provision of Interventional Radiology Services in Europe: CIRSE Recommendations

  • CIRSE Standards of Practice Guidelines
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interventional Radiology (IR) is an essential part of modern medicine, delivering minimally invasive patient-focused care, which has been proven to be safe and effective in both elective and emergency settings. The aim of this document is to outline the core requirements and standards for the provision of Interventional Radiological services, including training, certification, manpower, and accreditation. The ultimate challenge will be the adoption of these recommendations by different countries and health economies around the world, in turn ensuring equal access to IR treatments for all patients, the appropriate distribution of resources for IR service provision as well as the continued development of safe and high-quality IR services in Europe and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grøndal N, Søgaard R, Henneberg S et al. The Viborg vascular (VIVA) screening trial of 65–74 year old men in the central region of Denmark: study protocol. Trials 2010;11:67. www.trialsjournal.com/content/11/1/67

  2. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(Suppl 1):S1–75.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Provision of Services for Patients with Vascular Disease 2012 Haemodialysis Access Intervention 4.4;4.35:p24

  4. WHO Cardiovascular Diseases Fact Sheet No. 317. 2015. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/. Accessed 6 Mar 2015

  5. The Royal College of Radiologists in collaboration with the British Society of Interventional Radiology. Provision of interventional radiology services. London; 2014

  6. CIRSE IR Patient Safety Checklist. www.cirse.org/Checklist

  7. The European Board of Interventional Radiology. www.cirse.org/ebir

  8. European Curriculum and Syllabus for IR. www.cirse.org/curriculum_syllabus

  9. British Society of Interventional Radiology Quality Improvement. www.bsir-qi.com

  10. Heuser L, Arnold CN, Morhard D, Gross-Fengels W, Bücker A. Quality report 2011 of the German Society of Interventional Radiology (DeGIR)—report about treatment quality of minimal invasive procedures. Rofo. 2012;184(6):570–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. German Society for Interventional Radiology and Microinvasive Therapy (DeGIR). www.degir.de/site/qualitaetssicherung

  12. The Royal College of Radiologists. www.rcr.ac.uk

  13. Miller DL, Vano E, Bartal G, et al. Occupational radiation protection in Interventional Radiology: a joint guideline of the cardiovascular and interventional society of Europe and the society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Inter Radiol. 2010;21:607–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stecker MS, Balter S, Towben RB, et al. Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Inter Rad. 2009;20(Suppl):S263–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the European Union (The MEDRAPET Guidance document). European Commission (Radiation Protection Series, No. 175); 2014

  16. CIRSE Standards of Practice Documents. www.cirse.org/standards

Bibliography

  1. Lee MJ, Belli AM, Brountzos E, et al. Specialty status for Interventional Radiology: the time is now. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37(4):862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Simonetti G, Bollero E, Ciarrapico AM, et al. Hospital organization and importance of an interventional radiology inpatient admitting service: Italian single-center 3-year experience. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2009;32:213e20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Christie A, Robertson I, Moss J. Interventional radiology emergency service provision for a large UK urban population: initial 3.5 years of experience. Clin Radiol. 2013;68(8):e440–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland. The provision of vascular services for patients with vascular disease. London: Royal College of Surgeons; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reekers JA. The spider model for clinical involvement in radiology. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;5:403–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Margulis AR, Sunshine JH. Radiology at the turn of millennium. Radiology. 2000;214:15–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Helmberger T, Marti-Bonmati L, Pereira P, et al. Radiologists’ leading position in image-guide therapy. Insights Imaging. 2013;4:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. The Royal College of Radiologists. Standards for providing a 24-hour interventional radiology service. London; 2008.

  9. The Royal College of Radiologists. Implications to Consultant Job Plans for those with responsibility for managing specialty training programmes; 2007

  10. The Royal College of Radiologists. How many radiologists do we need? A guide to planning hospital radiology services; 2008

  11. The Royal College of Radiologists. Standards in vascular radiology. 2nd ed.; 2007.

  12. The Royal College of Radiologists. Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings—Standards for Clinical Radiologists; 2005.

  13. Berkhemer OA, Fransen SS, Baumer D, van den Berg L, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The working group for this document would like to thank all those who were involved in its creation, including Dr. Nikolaos Galanakis (Heraklion, Greece) who acted as the Research Assistant for this document.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios Tsetis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsetis, D., Uberoi, R., Fanelli, F. et al. The Provision of Interventional Radiology Services in Europe: CIRSE Recommendations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39, 500–506 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-016-1299-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-016-1299-0

Keywords

Navigation