Skip to main content
Log in

Flat-Panel Cone-Beam Ct-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Very Small (≤1.5 cm) Liver Tumors: Technical Note on a Preliminary Experience

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to investigate the technical feasibility of flat-panel cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of very small (<1.5 cm) liver tumors.

Materials and Methods

Patients included were candidates for hepatic percutaneous RFA as they had single biopsy-proven hepatic tumors sized ≤1.5 cm and poorly defined on ultrasonography. Following apnea induction, unenhanced CBCT scans were acquired and used to deploy the RF electrode with the aid of a virtual navigation system. If the tumor was not clearly identified on the unenhanced CBCT scan, a right retrograde arterial femoral access was established to carry out hepatic angiography and localize the tumor. Patients’ lesions and procedural variables were recorded and analyzed.

Results

Three patients (2 male and 1 female), aged 68, 76, and 87 years were included; 3 lesions (2 hepato-cellular carcinoma and 1 metastasis from colorectal cancer) were treated. One patient required hepatic angiography. Cycles of apnea used to acquire CBCT images and to deploy the electrode lasted <120 s. Mean fluoroscopic time needed to deploy the electrode was 36.6 ± 5.7 min. Mean overall procedural time was 66.0 ± 22.9 min. No peri- or post-procedural complications were noted. No cases of incomplete ablation were noted at 1-month follow-up.

Conclusion

Percutaneous CBCT-guided liver RFA with or without arterial hepatic angiography is technically feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Kim YJ, Lee MW, Park HS (2013) Small hepatocellular carcinomas: ultrasonography guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Abdom Imaging 38(1):98–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim JE, Kim YS, Rhim H, Lim HK, Lee MW, Choi D, Shin SW, Cho SK (2011) Outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma referred for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation at a tertiary center: analysis focused on the feasibility with the use of ultrasonography guidance. Eur J Radiol 79(2):e80–e84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jakobs TF, Hoffmann RT, Schrader A, Stemmler HJ, Trumm C, Lubienski A, Murthy R, Helmberger TK, Reiser MF (2009) CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in patients with hepatic metastases from breast cancer. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32(1):38–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta R, Cheung AC (2008) Flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, technology, and applications. Radiographics 28(7):2009–2022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y (2007) Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 17(11):2767–2779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Livraghi T, Meloni F, Di Stasi M, Rolle E, Solbiati L, Tinelli C, Rossi S (2008) Sustained complete response and complications rates after radiofrequency ablation of very early hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Is resection still the treatment of choice? Hepatology 47(1):82–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng ZW, Lin XJ, Zhang YJ, Liang HH, Guo RP, Shi M, Chen MS (2012) Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas 2 cm or smaller: a retrospective comparative study. Radiology 262(3):1022–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grasso RF, Cazzato RL, Luppi G, D’Agostino F, Schena E, Del Vescovo R, Giurazza F, Faiella E (2013) Beomonte Zobel B. Percutaneous lung biopsies: performance of an optical CT-based navigation system with a low-dose protocol. Eur Radiol 23(11):3071–3076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hakime A, Deschamps F, De Carvalho EG, De Carvalho EG, Barah A, Auperin A, De Baere T (2012) Electromagnetic-tracked biopsy under ultrasound guidance: preliminary results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 35(4):898–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JY, Choi BI, Chung YE, Kim MW, Kim SH, Han JK (2012) Clinical value of CT/MR-US fusion imaging for radiofrequency ablation of hepatic nodules. Eur J Radiol 81(9):2281–2289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rajesh S, Mukund A, Arora A, Jain D, Sarin SK (2013) Contrast-enhanced US-guided radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24(8):1235–1240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Filippousis P, Sotiropoulou E, Sotiropoulou E, Manataki A, Konstantinopoulos O, Konstantinopoulos O, Thanos L (2011) Radiofrequency ablation of subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: single center experience. Eur J Radiol 77(2):299–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morimoto M, Numata K, Kondo M, Nozaki A, Hamaguchi S, Takebayashi S, Tanaka K (2010) C-arm cone beam CT for hepatic tumor ablation under real-time 3D imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(5):W452–W454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Braak SJ, Braak SJ, Herder GJ, van Heesewijk JP, van Strijen MJ (2012) Pulmonary masses: initial results of cone-beam CT guidance with needle planning software for percutaneous lung biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35(6):1414–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ale JF (2013) Cone-beam CT vascular applications. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 16(3):144–149

  16. Braak SJ, Zuurmond K, Aerts HC, van Leersum M, Overtoom TT, van Heesewijk JP, van Strijen MJ (2013) Feasibility study of needle placement in percutaneous vertebroplasty: cone-beam computed tomography guidance versus conventional fluoroscopy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36(4):1120–1126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Roberto Luigi Cazzato would like to thank CIRSE Fundation for supporting him with an educational Grant allowing him to attend a fellowship at the Department of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France. Without the support of such Grant, the present paper would have not be possible.

Conflict of interest

Roberto Luigi Cazzato, Xavier Buy, Nicolas Alberti, Mariane Fonck, Rosario Francesco Grasso and Jean Palussiere declare they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement of Human Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Luigi Cazzato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cazzato, R.L., Buy, X., Alberti, N. et al. Flat-Panel Cone-Beam Ct-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Very Small (≤1.5 cm) Liver Tumors: Technical Note on a Preliminary Experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38, 206–212 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-1019-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-1019-6

Keywords

Navigation