Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy Combined With Intravesical Chemotherapy Versus Intravesical Chemotherapy Alone: A Randomised Prospective Pilot Study for T1G3 Bladder Transitional Cell Carcinoma After Bladder-Preserving Surgery

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy versus intravesical chemotherapy alone for T1G3 bladder transitional cell carcinoma (BTCC) followed by bladder-preserving surgery.

Materials and Methods

Sixty patients with T1G3 BTCC were randomly divided into two groups. After bladder-preserving surgery, 29 patients (age 30–80 years, 24 male and 5 female) received intra-arterial chemotherapy in combination with intravesical chemotherapy (group A), whereas 31 patients (age 29–83 years, 26 male and 5 female) were treated with intravesical chemotherapy alone (group B). Twenty-nine patients were treated with intra-arterial epirubicin (50 mg/m2) + cisplatin (60 mg/m2) chemotherapy 2–3 weeks after bladder-preserving surgery once every 4–6 weeks. All of the patients received the same intravesical chemotherapy: An immediate prophylactic was administered in the first 6 h. After that, therapy was administered one time per week for 8 weeks and then one time per month for 8 months. The instillation drug was epirubicin (50 mg/m2) and lasted for 30–40 min each time. The end points were tumour recurrence (stage Ta, T1), tumour progression (to T2 or greater), and disease-specific survival. During median follow-up of 22 months, the overall survival rate, tumour-specific death rate, recurrence rate, progression rate, time to first recurrence, and adverse reactions were compared between groups.

Results

The recurrence rates were 10.3 % (3 of 29) in group A and 45.2 % (14 of 31) in group B, and the progression rates were 0 % (0 of 29) in group A and 22.6 % (7 of 31) in group B. There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding recurrence (p = 0.004) and progression rates (p = 0.011). Median times to first recurrence in the two groups were 15 and 6.5 months, respectively. The overall survival rates were 96.6 and 87.1 %, and the tumour-specific death rates were 0 % (0 of 29) and 13.5 % (4 of 31) in groups A and B, respectively. During the intra-arterial chemotherapy cycle, although more than 50 % patients experienced some toxicities, most were minor and reversible [grade 1–2 (46.7 %) vs. grade 1–2 (6.9 %)].

Conclusion

These findings suggest that combining intra-arterial chemotherapy with intravesical chemotherapy could delay tumour recurrence and progression compared with intravesical chemotherapy alone and this type treatment is relatively safe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pham HT, Soloway MS (1997) High-risk superficial bladder cancer: intravesical therapy for T1, G3 transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Semin Urol Oncol 15:147–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jakse G, Loidl W, Seeber G et al (1987) Stage T1, grade 3 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: an unfavorable tumor? J Urol 137:39–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Denzinger S, Fritsche H-M, Otto W et al (2008) Early versus deferred cystectomy for initial high-risk pT1G3 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: do risk factors define feasibility of bladder-sparing approach? Eur Urol 53:146–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Beradinis E, Busetto GM, Antonini G et al (2011) T1G3 high-risk NMIBC (non-muscle invasive bladder cancer): conservative treatment versus immediate cystectomy. J Int Urol Nephrol 43:1047–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Manoharan M, Soloway MS (2005) Optimal management of the T1G3 bladder cancer. Urol Clin N Am 32:133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kulkarni GS, Finelli A, Fleshner NE et al (2007) Optimal management of high-risk T1G3 bladder cancer: a decision analysis. PLOS Med 4:1538–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiss C, Wolze C, Engehausen DG et al (2006) Radiochemotherapy after transurethral resection for high-risk T1bladder cancer: an alternative to intravesical therapy or early cystectomy? J Clin Oncol 24:2318–2324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harland SJ, Kynaston H, Grigor K et al (2007) A randomized trial of radical radiotherapy for the management of pT1G3 NXM0 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 178:807–813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pawinski A, Sylvester R, Kurth KH et al (1996) A combined analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, and Medical Research Council randomized clinical trials for the prophylactic treatment of TaT1 bladder cancer. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Tract Cancer Cooperative group and the Medical Research Council Working Part on Superficial Bladder Cancer. J Urol 56:1934–1941

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kulkarni GS, Hakenberg OW, Gschwend JE (2010) An updated critical analysis of treatment strategy for newly diagnosed high-grade T1 (previously T1G3) bladder cancer. J Eur Urol 57:60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden Lamm DL (2002) Intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guerin reduces the risk of progression in patients with superficial bladder cancer: a combined analysis of the published results of randomized clinical trials. J Urol 168:1964–1970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bohle A, Bock PR (2004) Intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guerin versus mitomycin C in superficial bladder cancer: formal meta-analysis of comparative studies on tumor progression. Urology 63:682–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith JA Jr, Labasky RF, Cockett AT et al (1999) Bladder cancer clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (stages Ta, T1 and TIS): the American Urological Association. J Urol 162:1697–1701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ojea A, Nogueira JL, Solsona E et al (2007) A multicentre, randomised prospective trial comparing three intravesical adjuvant therapies for intermediate-risk superficial bladder cancer: low-dose Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (27 mg) versus very low-dose Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (13.5 mg) versus mitomycin C. Eur Urol 52:1398–1406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sexton WJ, Wiegand LR, Correa JJ et al (2010) Bladder cancer: a review of non-muscle invasive disease. J Cancer Control 17:256–268

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mori K, Nomata K, Noguchi M et al (2007) Long-term follow up of patients with invasive bladder carcinoma receiving combined cisplatin-based intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Int J Urol 14:591–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Azuma H, Inamoto T, Ibuki N et al (2010) Novel bladder preservation therapy for locally invasive bladder cancer: combined therapy using balloon-occluded arterial infusion of anticancer agent and hemodialysis with concurrent radiation. Int J Oncol 37:773–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen MK, Qin ZK, Zhou FJ et al (2009) Intra-arterial chemotherapy is reliable in preventing high-risk superficial bladder cancer from recurrence and progression. J Chemother 21:681–686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng CW, Ng MT, Chan SY et al (2004) Low dose BCG as adjuvant therapy for superficial bladder cancer and literature review. ANZ J Surg 74:569–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hurle R, Losa A, Ranieri A et al (1996) Low dose Pasteur Bacillus Calmette–Guerin regimen in stage T1, grade 3 bladder cancer therapy. J Urol 156:1602–1605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lebret T, Gaudez F, Hervel J-M et al (1998) Low-dose BCG instillations in the treatment of stage T1 grade 3 bladder tumors: recurrence, progression and success. Eur Urol 34:67–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez-Pineiro JA, Flores N, Isorna S et al (2002) Long-term follow-up of a randomized prospective trial comparing a standard 81 mg dose of intravesical Bacille Calmette–Guerin with a reduced dose of 27 mg in superficial bladder cancer. BJU Int 89:671–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoneyama T, Ohyama C, Imai A et al (2008) Low-dose instillation therapy with Bacille Calmette–Guerin Tokyo 172 strain after transurethral resection: historical cohort study. Urology 71:1161–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Di Lorenzo G, Perdona S, Damiano R et al (2010) Gemcitabine versus Bacille Calmette–Guerin after initial Bacille Calmette–Guerin failure in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter prospective randomized trial. J Cancer 116:1896–1900

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kubota Y, Kakizaki H, Numasawa K et al (1989) Preoperative intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy for patients with bladder cancer. Eur Urol 16:189–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hashine K, Kusuhara Y, Miura N et al (2009) Bladder preservation therapy conducted by intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Jpn Clin Oncol 39:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Azuma H, Inamoto T, Ibuki N et al (2010) Novel bladder preservation therapy for locally invasive bladder cancer combined therapy using balloon-occluded arterial infusion of anticancer agent and hemodialysis with concurrent radiation. J Int J Oncol 37:773–785

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bohle A, Jocham D, Bock PR (2003) Intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guerin versus mitomycin C for superficial bladder: a formal metaanalysis of comparative studies on recurrence and toxicity. Urology 169:90–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Patard J, Moudouni JS, Saint F et al (2001) Tumor progression and survival in patients with T1G3 bladder tumors: multicentric retrospective study comparing 94 patients treated during 17 years. Urology 58:551–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lebret T, Gaudez F, Herve JM et al (1998) Low-dose BCG instillations in the treatment of stage T1 grade 3 bladder tumors: recurrence, progression and success. Eur Urol 34:67–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hurle R, Losa A, Manzetti A et al (1999) Intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guerin in stage T1 grade 3 bladder cancer therapy: a 7-year follow-up. Urology 54:258–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Margel D, Tal R, Golan S et al (2007) Long-term follow-up of patients with stage T1 high-grade transitional cell carcinoma managed by Bacillus Calmette–Guerin immunotherapy. Urology 69:78–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ficarra V, Dalpiaz O, Alrabi N et al (2005) Correlation between clinical and pathological staging in a series of radical cystectomies for bladder carcinoma. BJU Int 95:786–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiaping Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, J., Yao, Z., Qiu, S. et al. Comparing Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy Combined With Intravesical Chemotherapy Versus Intravesical Chemotherapy Alone: A Randomised Prospective Pilot Study for T1G3 Bladder Transitional Cell Carcinoma After Bladder-Preserving Surgery. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36, 1521–1526 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0594-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0594-2

Keywords

Navigation