Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical Revascularization for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endovascular mechanical revascularization (thrombectomy) is an increasingly used method for intracranial large vessel recanalization in acute stroke. The purpose of the study was to analyze the recanalization rate, clinical outcome, and complication rate in our stroke patients treated with mechanical revascularization.

Methods

A total of 57 patients with large vessel stroke (within 3 h for anterior and 12 h for posterior circulation) were treated with mechanical revascularization at a single center during 24 months. The primary goal of endovascular treatment using different mechanical devices was recanalization of the occluded vessel. Recanalization rate (reported as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [TICI] score), clinical outcome (reported as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score and modified Rankin scale [mRS] score), as well as periprocedural complications were analyzed.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 63.1 ± 12.9 years, with baseline median NIHSS score of 14 (interquartile range, 9.5–19). Successful recanalization (TICI 2b or 3) was achieved in 41 (72 %) patients. Twenty patients (35 %) presented with favorable outcome (mRS ≤2) 30 days after stroke. Overall, significant neurological improvement (≥4 NIHSS point reduction) occurred in 36 (63 %) patients. A clinically significant procedure-related adverse events (vessel disruption, peri/postprocedural intracranial bleeding) defined with decline in NIHSS of ≥4 or death occurred in three (5 %) patients.

Conclusions

The study showed a high recanalization rate with improved clinical outcome and a low rate of periprocedural complications in our stroke patients treated with mechanical revascularization. Therefore, we could conclude that endovascular revascularization (primary or in combination with a bridging thrombolysis) was an effective and safe procedure for intracranial large vessel recanalization in acute stroke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Graph 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith WS, Tsao JW, Billings ME et al (2006) Prognostic significance of angiographically confirmed large vessel intracranial occlusion in patients presenting with acute brain ischemia. Neurocrit Care 4:14–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group (1995) Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 333:1581–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E et al (2008) Thrombolysis with Alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 359(13):1317–1329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saqqur M, Uchino K, Demchuk AM et al (2007) Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial Doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke 38:948–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. IMS Trial Investigators (2004) Combined intravenous and intra-arterial recanalization for acute ischemic stroke: the Interventional Management of Stroke Study. Stroke 35:904–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grunwald IQ, Wakhloo AK, Walter S et al (2011) Endovascular stroke treatment today. Am J Neuroradiol 32:238–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith WS, Sung G, Saver J et al (2008) Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the Multi-MERCI Trial. Stroke 39:1205–1212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazighi M, Serfaty JM, Labreuche J et al (2009) Comparison of intravenous Alteplase with a combined intravenous endovascular approach in patients with stroke and confirmed arterial occlusion (RECANALISE study): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 8:802–809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bose A, Henkes H, Alfke K et al (2008) The penumbra system: a mechanical device for the treatment of acute stroke due to thromboembolism. Am J Neuroradiol 29:1409–1413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rha JH, Saver JL (2007) The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 38(3):967–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin K, Rapalino O, Law M et al (2008) Accuracy of the alberta stroke program early CT score during the first 3 hours of middle cerebral artery stroke: comparison of noncontrast CT, CT angiography source images, and CT perfusion. Am J Neuroradiol 29(5):931–936

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators (2009) The Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke 40:2761–2768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Castano C, Dorado L, Guerrero C et al (2010) Mechanical thrombectomy with the solitaire AB device in large artery occlusions of the anterior circulation: a pilot study. Stroke 41(8):1836–1840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H et al (2003) Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 34:109–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kulcsár Z, Bonvin C, Pereira VM et al (2010) Penumbra system: a novel mechanical thrombectomy device for large vessel occlusions in acute stroke. Am J Neuroradiol 31(4):628–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Dávalos A et al (2008) Thrombolysis with alteplase 3–4.5 h after acute ischaemic stroke (SITS-ISTR): an observational study. Lancet 372(9646):1303–1309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brekenfeld C, Schroth G, Mordasini P et al (2011) Impact of retrievable stents on acute ischemic stroke treatment. Am J Neuroradiol 32(7):1269–1273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Machi P, Costalat V, Lobotesis K et al (2012) Solitaire FR thrombectomy system: immediate results in 56 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients. J Neurointerv Surg 4(1):62–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eesa M, Schumacher HC, Higashida RT et al (2011) Advances in revascularization for acute ischemic stroke treatment: an update. Expert Rev Neurother 11(8):1125–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miran Jeromel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeromel, M., Milosevic, Z.V., Kocijancic, I.J. et al. Mechanical Revascularization for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36, 338–345 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0441-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0441-x

Keywords

Navigation