Skip to main content
Log in

Tumor Response and Apoptosis of N1-S1 Rodent Hepatomas in Response to Intra-arterial and Intravenous Benzamide Riboside

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Benzamide riboside (BR) induces tumor apoptosis in multiple cell lines and animals. This pilot study compares apoptosis and tumor response in rat hepatomas treated with hepatic arterial BR (IA) or intravenous (IV) BR.

Methods

A total of 106 N1-S1 cells were placed in the left hepatic lobes of 15 Sprague-Dawley rats. After 2 weeks, BR (20 mg/kg) was infused IA (n = 5) or IV (n = 5). One animal in each group was excluded for technical factors, which prevented a full dose administration (1 IA and 1 IV). Five rats received saline (3 IA and 2 IV). Animals were killed after 3 weeks. Tumor volumes after IA and IV treatments were analyzed by Wilcoxon rank sum test. The percentage of tumor and normal liver apoptosis was counted by using 10 fields of TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling)-stained slides at 40× magnification. The percentage of apoptosis was compared between IV and IA administrations and with saline sham-treated rats by the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results

Tumors were smaller after IA treatment, but this did not reach statistical significance (0.14 IA vs. 0.57 IV; P = 0.138). There was much variability in percentage of apoptosis and no significant difference between IA and IV BR (44.49 vs. 1.52%; P = 0.18); IA BR and saline (44.49 vs. 33.83%; P = 0.66); or IV BR and saline (1.52 vs. 193%; P = 0.18).

Conclusions

Although differences in tumor volumes did not reach statistical significance, there was a trend toward smaller tumors after IA BR than IV BR in this small pilot study. Comparisons of these treatment methods will require a larger sample size and repeat experimentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Reichman ME (2009) Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005. J Clin Oncol 27:1485–1491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lopez PM, Villanueva A, Llovet JM (2006) Systematic review: evidence–based management of hepatocellular carcinoma-an updated analysis of randomized controlled trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23:1535–1547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lencioni RA, Allgaier HP, Cioni D et al (2003) Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology 228:235–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Llovet JM (2005) Updated treatment approach to hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 40:225–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Llovet JM, Schwartz M, Mazzaferro V (2005) Resection and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 25:181–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Llovet J, Real MI, Montana X et al (2002) Arterial embolization or chemoembolization versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 359:1734–1739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK et al (2002) Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 35:1164–1171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lammer J, Malagari K, Vogl T et al (2010) Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:41–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Damaraju VL, Visser F, Zhang J et al (2005) Role of human nucleoside transporters in the cellular uptake of two inhibitors of IMP dehydrogenase, tiazofurin and benzamide riboside. Mol Pharmacol 67:273–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jayaram HN, Grusch M, Cooney DA et al (1999) Consequences of IMP dehydrogenase inhibition, and its relationship to cancer and apoptosis. Curr Med Chem 6:554–561

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jayaram HN, Gharehbaghi K, Jayaram N et al (1992) Cytotoxicity of a new IMP dehydrogenase inhibitor, benzamide riboside, to human myelogenous leukemia K562 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 186:1600–1606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grusch M, Rosenberger G, Fuhrmann G et al (1999) Benzamide riboside induces apoptosis independent of Cdc25A expression in human ovarian carcinoma N.1 cells. Cell Death Differ 6:736–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Saunders PP, Arimill S, Krohn K et al (1996) Metabolism and action of benzamide riboside in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Anticancer Drugs 7:93–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McLennan G, Cressman EK, Jagtap M et al (2005) The effect of benzamide riboside on a VX2 model of liver cancer in rabbits. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1499–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jayaram HN, Yalowitz JA, Arguello F et al (2002) Toxicity and efficacy of benzamide riboside in cancer chemotherapy models. Curr Med Chem 9:787–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ju S, McLennan G, Bennett SL et al (2009) Technical aspects of imaging and transfemoral arterial treatment of n1-s1 tumors in rats: an appropriate model to test the biology and therapeutic response to transarterial treatments of liver cancers. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:410–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Babsky AM, Ju S, Topper S et al (2008) Noninvasive monitoring of the hepatocellular carcinoma growth by the method of 1H and 23Na magnetic resonance. Ukr Biochem J 80:130–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Babsky AM, Ju S, Topper S et al (2009) Water diffusion and sodium magnetic resonance imaging in growing subcutaneous hepatocellular carcinoma. Visnyk Lviv Univ Biol Ser 49:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bonnac LF, Gao GY, Chen L et al (2007) Efficient synthesis of benzamide riboside, a potential anticancer agent. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 26:1249–1253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Holm S (1979) A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yalowitz J, Jayaram HN (2000) Molecular targets of guanine nucleotides in differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. Anticancer Res 20:2329–2338

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson RC, Weber G, Morris H (1975) IMP dehydrogenase, an enzyme linked with proliferation and malignancy. Nature 256(5515):331–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gharehbaghi K, Sreenath A, Hao Z et al (1994) Comparison of biochemical parameters of benzamide riboside, a new inhibitor of IMP dehydrogenase, with tiazofurin and selenazofurin. Biochem Pharm 48:1413–1419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grifantini M, Tiazofurine ICN (2000) Pharmaceuticals. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 1:257–262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jayaram HN, Lapis E, Tricot G et al (1992) Clinical pharmacokinetic study of tiazofurin administered as a 1-hour infusion. Int J Cancer 51:182–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tricot GJ, Jayaram HN, Lapis E et al (1989) Biochemically directed therapy of leukemia with tiazofurin, a selective blocker of inosine 5′-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. Cancer Res 49:3696–3701

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wright DG, Boosalis MS, Waraska K et al (1996) Tiazofurin effects on IMP-dehydrogenase activity and expression in the leukemia cells of patients with CML blast crisis. Anticancer Res 16:3349–3351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Natsumeda Y, Carr SF (1993) Human type I and II IMP dehydrogenase as drug targets. Ann NY Acad Sci 696:88–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lesiak K, Watanabe KA, Majumdar A et al (1997) Synthesis of nonhydrolyzable analogues of thiazole-4-carboxamide and benzamide adenine dinucleotide containing fluorine atom at the C2′ of adenine nucleoside: induction of K562 differentiation and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitory activity. J Med Chem 40:2533–2538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Salamon A, Hagenauer B, Thalhammer T et al (2001) Metabolism and disposition of the novel antileukaemic drug, benzamide riboside, in the isolated perfused rat liver. Life Sci 69:2489–2502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pathak S, Sharma C, Jayaram HN et al (2009) Apoptotic signaling induced by benzamide riboside: an in vitro study. Mol Cell Biochem 328:67–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was partially funded by a pilot grant and a clinical fellowship research grant from the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Jayaram holds U.S. patent 5902792 (International Class A61K 31/70 [20060101]) for a “Method of inducing apoptosis in cancer cells,” which covers the use of BR and its salts to cause cancer cell death. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon McLennan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLennan, G., Bennett, S.L., Ju, S. et al. Tumor Response and Apoptosis of N1-S1 Rodent Hepatomas in Response to Intra-arterial and Intravenous Benzamide Riboside. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35, 645–652 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-011-0140-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-011-0140-z

Keywords

Navigation