Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single-Institution Results of Image-Guided Nonplugged Percutaneous Versus Transjugular Liver Biopsy

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To retrospectively review patients who underwent transjugular and image-guided percutaneous biopsy and compare the relative risk of ascites, thrombocytopenia, and coagulopathy.

Materials and Methods

From August 2001 through February 2006, a total of 238 liver biopsies were performed. The radiologist reviewed all patient referrals for transjugular biopsy. These patients either underwent transjugular biopsy or were reassigned to percutaneous biopsy (crossover group). Patients referred to percutaneous image-guided liver biopsy underwent this same procedure. Biopsies were considered successful if a tissue diagnosis could be made from the samples obtained.

Results

A total of 36 transjugular biopsies were performed with 3 total (8.3%) and 1 major (2.8%) complications. A total of 171 percutaneous biopsies were performed with 10 (5.8%) total and 3 (1.8%) major complications. The crossover group showed a total of 4 (12.9%) complications with 1 (3.2%) major complication. Sample adequacy was 91.9% for transjugular and 99.5% for percutaneous biopsy.

Conclusion

Both transjugular and percutaneous liver biopsy techniques are efficacious and safe. Contraindications such as thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, and ascites are indicators of greater complications but are not necessarily prevented by transjugular biopsy. Percutaneous biopsy more frequently yields a diagnostic specimen than transjugular biopsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McAfee JH, Keeffe EB, Lee RG et al (1992) Transjugular liver biopsy. Hepatology 15:726–732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kalambokis G, Manousou P, Vibhakorn S et al (2007) Transjugular liver biopsy—indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications. A systematic review. J Hepatol 47:284–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thanos L, Zormpala A, Papaioannou G et al (2005) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous CT-guided liver biopsy using an 18-gauge automated needle. Eur J Intern Med 16:571–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S (2001) Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med 344:495–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rockey D, Caldwell S, Goodman Z et al (2009) American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver biopsy. Hepatology 49:1017–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF et al (2003) Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(9P2):199–202

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meng HC, Lin H, Huang CC et al (1994) Transjugular liver biopsy: comparison with percutaneous liver biopsy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:457–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sawyerr AM, McCormick PA, Tennyson GS et al (1993) A comparison of transjugular and plugged-percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with impaired coagulation. J Hepatol 17:81–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Atar E, Ben Ari Z, Bachar G et al (2009) A comparison of transjugular and plugged-percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with contraindications to ordinary percutaneous liver biopsy and an “in-house” protocol for selecting the procedure of choice. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:560–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dawson MA, McCarthy PH, Walsh ME et al (2005) Transjugular liver biopsy is a safe and effective intervention to guide management for patients with a congenital bleeding disorder infected with hepatitis C. Intern Med J 35:556–559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mammen T, Keshava SN, Eapen CE et al (2008) Transjugular liver biopsy: a retrospective analysis of 601 cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:351–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vibhakorn S, Cholongitas E, Kalambokis G et al (2009) A comparison of four-versus three-pass transjugular biopsy using a 19-G Tru-Cut needle and a randomized study using a cassette to prevent biopsy fragmentation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32:508–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamphuisen PW, Wiersma TG, Mulder CJJ et al (2002) Plugged-percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with impaired coagulation and ascites. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 32:190–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith TP, McDermott VG, Ayoub DM (1996) Percutaneous transhepatic liver biopsy with tract embolization. Radiology 198:769–774

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith TP, Presson TL, Heneghan MA et al (2003) Transjugular biopsy of the liver in pediatric and adult patients using an 18-gauge automated core biopsy needle: a retrospective review of 410 consecutive procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:167–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kardache M, Soyer MP, Boudiaf M et al (1997) Transjugular liver biopsy with an automated device. Radiology 204:369–372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yavuz K, Geyik S, Barton RE et al (2007) Transjugular liver biopsy via the left internal jugular vein. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:237–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cholongitas E, Senzolo M, Standish R et al (2006) A systematic review of the quality of liver biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 125:710–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Thanks to Dan Deneen for editorial assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rulon L. Hardman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hardman, R.L., Perrich, K.D. & Silas, A.M. Single-Institution Results of Image-Guided Nonplugged Percutaneous Versus Transjugular Liver Biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34, 369–375 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9924-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9924-9

Keywords

Navigation