Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arterial Distribution of Calibrated Tris-Acryl Gelatin and Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolization Microspheres in Sheep Uterus

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare, after embolization, the distribution in the uterine arterial vasculature of tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TGMS) and polyvinyl alcohol microspheres (PVAMS). A limited bilateral uterine artery embolization was performed in six adult sheep under fluoroscopic control by injecting in each uterine artery 0.25 ml of 500- to 700-μm TGMS of PVAMS suspended in 50/50 saline/contrast medium. Sacrifices were performed 1 week after embolization and uteri were analyzed histologically. The number and size of microspheres and vessels were measured, as well as the histological location according to a classification in four zones of the uterus. One hundred sixty-five vessels (69 vessels occluded with TGMS and 96 vessels occluded with PVAMS) were measured. The size of the occluded vessels decreased significantly from proximal to distal zones of the uterine vasculature (P < 0.0001). The location of TGMS and PVAMS within the vasculature was significantly different (P < 0.0001) since PVAMS blocked significantly more distally than TGMS. Deformation of the microspheres within the tissue was greater for PVAMS (18.0% ± 12.3%) than for TGMS (8.7% ± 9.2%) (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, PVAMS have a more distal distribution in the sheep uterine vasculature, compared to TGMS. Such differences in partition, already described in the kidney embolization model, can ultimately explain the different clinical outcome reported with these two types of microspheres in uterine fibroid embolization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laurent A (2007) Microspheres and nonspherical particles for embolization. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 10(4):248–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis AL, Adams C, Busby W, Jones SA, Wolfenden LC, Leppard SW, Palmer RR, Small S (2006) Comparative in vitro evaluation of microspherical embolisation agents. J Mater Sci Mater Med 17(12):1193–1204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Laurent A, Wassef M, Saint Maurice JP, Namur J, Pelage JP, Seron A, Chapot R, Merland JJ (2006) Arterial distribution of calibrated tris-acryl gelatin and polyvinyl alcohol microspheres in a sheep kidney model. Invest Radiol 41(1):8–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiesa AG, Hart WR (2004) Uterine artery embolization of leiomyomas with trisacryl gelatin microspheres (TGM): pathologic features and comparison with polyvinyl alcohol emboli. Int J Gynecol Pathol 23(4):386–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pelage JP (2004) Polyvinyl alcohol particles versus tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15(8):789–791

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spies JB, Benenati JF, Worthington-Kirsch RL, Pelage JP (2001) Initial experience with use of tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12(9):1059–1063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spies JB, Allison S, Flick P, McCullough M, Sterbis K, Cramp M, Bruno J, Jha R (2004) Polyvinyl alcohol particles and tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: results of a randomized comparative study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15(8):793–800

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spies JB, Allison S, Flick P, Cramp M, Bruno J, Jha RC, Ascher SA (2005) Spherical polyvinyl alcohol versus tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: results of a limited randomized comparative study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(11):1431–1437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spies JB, Cornell C, Worthington-Kirsch R, Lipman JC, Benenati JF (2007) Long-term outcome from uterine fibroid embolization with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres: results of a multicenter study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18(2):203–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pelage JP, Laurent A, Wassef M, Bonneau M, Germain D, Rymer R, Flaud P, Martal J, Merland JJ (2002) Uterine artery embolization in sheep: comparison of acute effects with polyvinyl alcohol particles and calibrated microspheres. Radiology 224(2):436–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Laurent A, Wassef M, Chapot R, Houdart E, Merland JJ (2004) Location of vessel occlusion of calibrated tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for tumor and arteriovenous malformation embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15(5):491–496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Belenky A, Bartal G, Gat Y, Bachar GN (2005) Uterine artery embolization: a pilot study in a rabbit model. Fertil Steril 83(2):487–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Golzarian J, Lang E, Hovsepian D, Kroncke T, Lampmann L, Lohle P, Pelage JP, Shlansky-Goldberg R, Valenti D, Vorwerk D, Spies J (2006) Higher rate of partial devascularization and clinical failure after uterine artery embolization for fibroids with spherical polyvinyl alcohol. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 29(1):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Siskin GP, Beck A, Schuster M, Mandato K, Englander M, Herr A (2008) Leiomyoma infarction after uterine artery embolization: a prospective randomized study comparing tris-acryl gelatin microspheres versus polyvinyl alcohol microspheres. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19(1):58–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abramowitz SD, Israel GM, McCarthy SM, Pollak JS, White RI Jr, Tal MG (2009) Comparison of four embolic materials at uterine artery embolization by using postprocedural MR imaging enhancement. Radiology 250(2):482–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of interest are as follows. Alexandre Laurent: eight patents received; inventor of a patent on trisacryl-gelatin microspheres whose ownership belongs to his employer, AP-HP. Michel Wassef: eight patents received; inventor of a patent on trisacryl-gelatin microspheres whose ownership belongs to his employer, AP-HP. Jean-Pierre Pelage: three consultancies in the last 3 years (Biosphere Medical, Biocompatibles UK, Terumo).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Laurent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laurent, A., Wassef, M., Namur, J. et al. Arterial Distribution of Calibrated Tris-Acryl Gelatin and Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolization Microspheres in Sheep Uterus. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33, 995–1000 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9822-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9822-1

Keywords

Navigation