Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Snared-Loop Technique When Standard Retrieval of Inferior Vena Cava Filters Fails

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose To identify the success and complications related to a variant technique used to retrieve inferior vena cava filters when simple snare approach has failed. Methods A retrospective review of all Cook Günther Tulip filters and Cook Celect filters retrieved between July 2006 and February 2008 was performed. During this period, 130 filter retrievals were attempted. In 33 cases, the standard retrieval technique failed. Retrieval was subsequently attempted with our modified retrieval technique. Results The retrieval was successful in 23 cases (mean dwell time, 171.84 days; range, 5–505 days) and unsuccessful in 10 cases (mean dwell time, 162.2 days; range, 94–360 days). Our filter retrievability rates increased from 74.6% with the standard retrieval method to 92.3% when the snared-loop technique was used. Unsuccessful retrieval was due to significant endothelialization (n = 9) and caval penetration by the filter (n = 1). A single complication occurred in the group, in a patient developing pulmonary emboli after attempted retrieval. Conclusion The technique we describe increased the retrievability of the two filters studied. Hook endothelialization is the main factor resulting in failed retrieval and continues to be a limitation with these filters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Millward SF, Oliva VL, Bell SD et al (2001) Günther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12(9):1053–1058

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Looby S, Given MF, Geoghegan T et al (2007) Günther Tulip retrievable inferior vena caval filters: indications, efficacy, retrieval, and complications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30(1):59–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Terhaar OA, Lyon SM, Given MF et al (2004) Extended interval for retrieval of Günther Tulip filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15(11):1257–1262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grande WJ, Trerotola SO, Reilly PM et al (2005) Experience with the Recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(9):1189–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubenstein L, Chun AK, Chew M et al (2007) Loop-snare technique for difficult inferior vena cava filter retrievals. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18(10):1315–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Binkert CA, Bansal A, Gates JD (2005) Inferior vena cava filter removal after 317-day implantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(3):395–398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Velmahos GC et al (2007) Practice patterns and outcomes of retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients: an AAST multicenter study. J Trauma 62(1):17–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neuerburg J, Günther RW, Rassmussen E et al (1993) New retrievable percutaneous vena cava filter: experimental in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 16(4):224–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burke CT, Dixon RG, Stavas JM (2007) Use of rigid bronchoscopic forceps in the difficult retrieval of the Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18(10):1319–1323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stavropoulos SW, Solomon JA, Trerotola SO (2006) Wall-embedded Recovery inferior vena cava filters: imaging features and technique for removal. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:379–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamagami T, Kato T, Nishimura T (2005) Successful retrieval of a Günther tulip vena cava filter with the assistance of a curved sheath introducer. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(12):1760–1762

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hagspiel KD, Leung DA, Aladdin M et al (2004) Difficult retrieval of a Recovery IVC filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15(6):645–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ullman JM (2006) Technique for snaring an inaccessible Günther Tulip filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17(6):1067–1068

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller MJ, Smith TP, Stavas JM (2006) Retrieval of the Günther Tulip and OptEase filters using the Recovery cone removal system. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17(5):899–902

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuo WT, Bostaph AS, Loh CT et al (2006) Retrieval of trapped Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filters: snare-over-guide wire loop technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17(11 pt 1):1845–1849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orla Doody.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doody, O., Noë, G., Given, M.F. et al. Assessment of Snared-Loop Technique When Standard Retrieval of Inferior Vena Cava Filters Fails. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32, 145–149 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9446-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9446-x

Keywords

Navigation