Abstract
Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are increasingly used for prevention of life-threatening pulmonary emboli in patients who have contraindications to anticoagulation therapy. We report a case of the removal of a permanent IVC filter, which was inadvertently inserted due to an incorrect ultrasound report.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nutting C, Coldwell D (2001) Use of TrapEase device as a temporary caval filter. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 12:991–993
Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Selby JB (1992) Inferior vena cava filters. Indications, safety, effectiveness. Arch Intern Med 152:1985–1994
Ray CE, Kaufman JA (1996) Complications of IVC filters. Abdom Imag 21:368–374
Streiff MB (2000) Vena caval filters: a comprehensive review. Blood 95:3669–3677
Given MF, Lyon SM, Foster A, et al. (2002) Retrievable Gunter-tulip filter: experience in 41 patients. Radiology 225(suppl):642
Millward MSF, Oliva VL, Bell SD, et al. (2001) Gunther tulip retrievable vena cava filter: results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. Vasc Intervent Radiol 12(9):1053–1058
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, B.C.A., Chakraverty, S. & Zealley, I. Removal of a Permanent IVC Filter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29, 124–125 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-005-0125-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-005-0125-x