Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CT-guided needle biopsy of brain lesions without a stereotactic device, and to determine the best possible indications for this technique.
Methods
From February 2001 to February 2004, 20 patients (12 men, 8 women; age 61–82 years) underwent CT-guided brain lesion biopsy. The procedure started with a brain CT scan for lesion localization and for selection of the inlet for needle insertion. The patient was then transported to the operating room where cranioanatrisis was performed. Subsequently, the biopsy was performed under CT guidance using a 14G brain biopsy needle with a blind smooth end and lateral holes. At the end of the biopsy, the field was checked for possible complications with a CT scan.
Results
Histopathologic results were: brain tumor in 16 patients (80%), inflammatory process in 3 (15%), and no conclusive diagnosis in 1 (5%). A repeat of the process was required in 2 patients. A minor complication of local hematoma was found in 1 patient (5%). There were no deaths or other serious complications.
Conclusion
CT-guided biopsy is a reliable method for histopathologic diagnosis of brain lesions in selected cases. It is a simple, fast, effective, low-cost procedure with minimal complications, indicated especially for superficial and large tumors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Maroon JC, Bank WO, Drayer BP (1977) Intracranial biopsy assisted by computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 46:740–744
Savitz MH (1992) Free-hand CT-guided needle for biopsy and drainage of intracerebral lesions: Ten years experience. Int Surg 77:211–215
Savitz MH (2000) CT-guided needle procedures for brain lesions: 20 years experience. Mt Sinai J Med 67:318–321
Goldstein S, Gumerlock MK, Neuwelt EA (1987) Comparison of CT-guided and stereotaxic cranial diagnostic needle biopsies. J Neurosurg 67:341–348
Giunta F, Marini G, Grasso G, et al (1988) Stereotactic biopsy for a better therapeutic approach. Acta Neurochir [Suppl] 42:182–186
DelGaudio JM, Dillard DG, Albritton FD, et al (2000) Computed tomography-guided needle biopsy of head and neck lesions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:366–370
Arbit E, Galicich JH (1994) Importance of image-guided stereotactic biopsy to confirm diagnosis in an oncological setting. Ann Surg Oncol 1:368–372
Benediktsson H, Andersson T, Sjolander U, et al (1992) Ultrasound guided needle biopsy of brain tumors using an automatic sampling instrument. Acta Radiol 33:512–517
Di Lorenzo N, Esposito V, Lunardi P, et al (1991) A comparison of computerized tomography-guided stereotactic and ultrasound-guided techniques for brain biopsy. J Neurosurg 75:763–765
Vindlacheruvu RR, Casey ATH, Thomas DGT (1999) MRI-guided stereotactic brain biopsy: A review of 33 cases. Br J Neurosurg 13:143–147
Voges J, Schroder R, Treuer H, et al (1993) CT-guided and computer assisted stereotactic biopsy: Technique, results, indications. Acta Neurochir 125:142–149
Blaauw G, Braakman R (1988) Pitfalls in diagnostic brain surgery. Acta Neurochir [Suppl] 42:161–165
Wen DY, Hall WA, Miller DA, et al (1993) Targeted brain biopsy: A comparison of freehand computed tomography-guided and stereotactic techniques. Neurosurgery 32:407–412
Lee T, Kenny BG, Hitchcock ER, et al (1991) Supratentorial masses: Stereotactic or freehand biopsy. Br J Neurosurg 5:331–338
Niizuma H, Otsuki T, Yonemitsu T, et al (1988) Experiences with CT-guided stereotaxic biopsies in 121 cases. Acta Neurochir [Suppl] 42:157–160
Seliem RM, Assaad MW, Gorombey SJ, et al (2003) Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the central nervous system performed freehand under computed tomography guidance without stereotactic instrumentation. Cancer 99:277–284
Bernstein M, Parrent AG (1994) Complications of CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions. J Neurosurg 81:165–168
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thanos, L., Mylona, S., Galani, P. et al. Freehand Two-Step CT-Guided Brain Tumor Biopsy: A Fast and Effective Interventional Procedure in Selected Patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29, 264–269 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-005-0015-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-005-0015-2