Advertisement

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 221–227 | Cite as

Percutaneous Venous Thrombectomy Using the Arrow-Trerotola Percutaneous Thrombolytic Device (PTD) with Temporary Caval Filtration: In Vitro Investigations

  • Joachim Ernst WildbergerEmail author
  • Patrick Haage
  • Jan Bovelander
  • Joachim Pfeffer
  • Claudia Weiss
  • Dierk Vorwerk
  • Thomas Schmitz-Rode
  • Rolf W. Günther
Laboratory Investigation

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the size and quantity of downstream emboli after thrombectomy using the Arrow-Trerotola Percutaneous Thrombolytic Device (PTD) with or without temporary filtration for extensive iliofemoral and iliocaval thrombi in an in vitro flow model.

Methods

Iliocaval thrombi were simulated by clotted bovine blood in a flow model (semilucent silicone tubings, diameter 12–16 mm). Five experimental set-ups were performed 10 times each; thrombus particles and distribution were measured in the effluent. First, after retrograde insertion, mechanical thrombectomy was performed using the PTD alone. Then a modified self-expanding tulip-shaped temporary vena cava stent filter was inserted additionally at the beginning of each declotting procedure and removed immediately after the intervention without any manipulation within or at the filter itself. In a third step, the filter was filled with thrombus only. Here, two experiments were performed: Careful closure within the flow circuit without any additional fragmentation procedure and running the PTD within the filter lumen, respectively. In the final set-up, mechanical thrombectomy was performed within the thrombus-filled tubing as well as in the filter lumen. The latter was closed at the end of the procedure and both devices were removed from the flow circuit.

Results

Running the PTD in the flow circuit without filter protection led to a fragmentation of 67.9% (±7.14%) of the clot into particles ≤500 μm; restoration of flow was established in all cases. Additional placement of the filter safely allowed maceration of 82.9% (±5.59%) of the thrombus. Controlled closure of the thrombus-filled filter within the flow circuit without additional mechanical treatment broke up 75.2% (±10.49%), while additional mechanical thrombectomy by running the PTD within the occluded filter led to dissolution of 90.4% (±3.99%) of the initial clot. In the final set-up, an overall fragmentation rate of 99.6% (±0.44%) was achieved.

Conclusions

The combined use of the Arrow-Trerotola PTD and a temporary vena cava stent filter proved to be effective for even large clot removal in this experimental set-up.

Keywords

Catheters and catheterization Fragmentation, mechanical Interventional procedures, experimental Vena cava, thrombosis Veins, iliac Veins, thrombosis 

References

  1. 1.
    Meissner, AJ, Huszcza, S 1996Surgical strategy for management of deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremitiesWorld J Surg2011491155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Donnell, TF, Browse, NL, Burnand, KG,  et al. 1977The socioeconomic effects of an iliofemoral venous thrombosisJ Surg Res22483488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gu, X, Sharafuddin, MJ, Titus, JL,  et al. 1997Acute and delayed outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy with use of the steerable Amplatz thrombectomy device in a model of subacute inferior vena cava thrombosisJ Vasc Interv Radiol8947956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hirsh, J, Hoak, J 1996Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A statement for healthcare professionals. Council on Thrombosis (in consultation with the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology), American Heart AssociationCirculation9322122245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Neglen, P, Nazzal, MM, al-Hassan, HK,  et al. 1992Surgical removal of an inferior vena cava thrombusEur J Vasc Surg67882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindner, DJ, Edwards, JM, Phinney, ES,  et al. 1986Long-term hemodynamic and clinical sequelae of lower extremity deep vein thrombosisJ Vasc Surg4436442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Semba, CP, Dake, MD 1994Iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: Aggressive therapy with catheter-directed thrombolysisRadiology191487494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bjarnason, H, Kruse, JR, Asinger, DA,  et al. 1998Iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: Safety and efficacy outcome during 5 years of catheter-directed thrombolytic therapyJ Vasc Interv Radiol8405418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharafuddin, MJA, Hicks, ME 1998Current status of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy II. Devices and mechanisms of actionJ Vasc Interv Radiol91531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmitz-Rode, T, Vorwerk, D, Schürmann, K,  et al. 1996Experimental impeller fragmentation of iliocaval thrombosis under tulip filter protection: Preliminary resultsCardiovasc Intervent Radiol19260264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vorwerk, D, Günther, RW, Schürmann, K,  et al. 1995Percutaneous balloon embolectomy with a self-expanding tulip sheath: In vivo experimentsRadiology197153156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brossmann, J, Bookstein, JJ 1998Percutaneous balloon-assisted thrombectomy: Preliminary in vivo results with an expandable vascular sheath systemRadiology206439445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ponomar, E, Carlson, JE, Kindlund, A,  et al. 1991Clot-trapper device for transjugular thrombectomy from the inferior vena cavaRadiology179279282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wildberger, JE, Schmitz-Rode, T, Schubert, H,  et al. 2000Percutaneous venous thrombectomy with the use of a balloon sheath: First in-vitro investigations of a new low-tech conceptInvest Radiol35352358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wildberger, JE, Schmitz-Rode, T, Reffelmann, T,  et al. 2000Percutaneous transjugular thrombectomy in iliocaval thrombosis: Initial experience with a newly developed 12-F balloon sheathFortschr Roentgenstr172651655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vorwerk, D, Schmitz-Rode, T, Schürmann, K,  et al. 1995Use of a temporary caval filter to assist percutaneous iliocaval thrombectomy: Experimental resultsJ Vasc Interv Radiol6737740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gandini, R, Maspes, F, Sodani, G,  et al. 1999Percutaneous ilio-caval thrombectomy with the Amplatz device: Preliminary resultsEur Radiol9951958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kasirajan, K, Gray, B, Ouriel, K 2001Percutaneous AngioJet thrombectomy in the management of extensive deep venous thrombosisJ Vasc Interv Radiol12179185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uflacker, R 1997Mechanical thrombectomy in acute and subacute thrombosis with use of the Amplatz device: Arterial and venous applicationsJ Vasc Interv Radiol8923932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reekers, JA, Blank, LEC 2000Iliocaval thrombosis: Percutaneous treatment with hydrodynamic thrombectomyEur Radiol10326328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lazzaro, CR, Trerotola, SO, Shah, H,  et al. 1999Modified use of the Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous thrombolytic device for the treatment of thrombosed hemodialysis access graftsJ Vasc Interv Radiol1010251031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trerotola, SO, Vesely, TM, Lund, GB,  et al. 1998Treatment of thrombosed hemodialysis access grafts: Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous thrombolytic device versus pulse-spray thrombolysisRadiology206403414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roček, M, Peregrin, JH, Lastovickova, J,  et al. 2000Mechanical thrombectomy of thrombosed hemodialysis native fistulas with use of the Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous thrombolytic device: Our preliminary experienceJ Vasc Interv Radiol1111531158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roček, M, Peregrin, JH, Velimsky, T 1998Mechanical thrombectomy of massive pulmonary embolism using an Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous thrombolytic deviceEur Radiol816831685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haage, P, Tacke, J, Bovelander, J,  et al. 2001Prototype percutaneous thrombolytic device: Preclinical testing in subacute inferior vena caval thrombosis in a pig modelRadiology220135141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McLennan, G, Trerotola, SO, Davidson, D,  et al. 2001The effects of a mechanical thrombolytic device on normal canine vein valvesJ Vasc Interv Radiol128994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trerotola, SO, McLennan, G, Eclavea, AC,  et al. 2001Mechanical thrombolysis of venous thrombosis in an animal model with use of temporary caval filtrationJ Vasc Interv Radiol1210751085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Trerotola, SO, McLennan, G, Davidson, D,  et al. 2001Preclinical in vivo testing of the Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous thrombolytic device for venous thrombosisJ Vasc Interv Radiol1295103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wildberger, JE, Schmitz-Rode, T, Haage, P,  et al. 2001Ultrasound thrombolysis in hemodialysis access: In vitro investigationCardiovasc Intervent Radiol245356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Holm, S 1979A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedureScand J Stat66570Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sharafuddin, MJA, Hicks, ME 1998Current status of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomyIII. Present and future applications. J Vasc Interv Radiol9209224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Usui, Y, Sauvage, LR, Wu, HD,  et al. 1987A comparative experimental study of the organization of arterial and venous thrombiAnn Surg205312317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sharafuddin, MJA, Hicks, ME 1997Current status of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomyI. General principles. J Vasc Interv Radiol8911921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Delomez, M, Beregi, JP, Willoteaux, S,  et al. 2001Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with deep venous thrombosisCardiovasc Intervent Radiol244248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hosaka, J, Roy, S, Kuroki, K,  et al. 1999Placement of a spring filter during interventional treatment of deep venous thrombosis to reduce the risk of pulmonary embolismActa Radiol40545551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Angle, JF, Matsumoto, AH, Al Shammari, M,  et al. 1998Transcatheter regional urokinase therapy in the management of inferior vena cava thrombosisJ Vasc Interv Radiol9917925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Buecker, A, Neuerburg, A, Schmitz-Rode, T,  et al. 1997In vitro evaluation of a rheolytic thrombectomy system for clot removal from five different temporary vena cava filtersCardiovasc Intervent Radiol20448451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Eier, H, Krause, FJ 1999Obstructed cava filter: Use of a mechanic thrombolysis deviceFortschr Roentgenstr171409411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vorwerk, D, Günther, RW, Clerc, C,  et al. 1992Percutaneous embolectomy: In vitro investigations of the self-expanding tulip sheathRadiology182415418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Weigele, JB, Sheline, ME, Cope, C 1992Expandable intravascular catheter: Percutaneous use for endoluminal retrievalsRadiology185604606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Trerotola, SO, Davidson, DD, Filo, RS,  et al. 1996Preclinical in vivo testing of a rotational mechanical thrombolytic deviceJ Vasc Interv Radiol7717723CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim Ernst Wildberger
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  • Patrick Haage
    • 1
  • Jan Bovelander
    • 2
  • Joachim Pfeffer
    • 1
  • Claudia Weiss
    • 3
  • Dierk Vorwerk
    • 4
  • Thomas Schmitz-Rode
    • 1
  • Rolf W. Günther
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyUniversity of TechnologyAachenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Clinical ResearchArrow InternationalDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Medical StatisticsUniversity of TechnologyAachenGermany
  4. 4.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyKlinikum IngolstadtIngolstadtGermany
  5. 5.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyUniversity Hospital, RWTH AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations