Skip to main content
Log in

Coronary Angioplasty and Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Sweden

  • CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has become the reperfusion method of choice in patients with coronary artery disease. This sometimes complicated and lengthy procedure is performed using fluoroscopy and cineradiography or digital imaging, which may result in considerable exposure to ionizing radiation. Possible cancer risks in PTCA patients have been discussed, but never before examined in a population-based setting.

Objective

To assess the cancer risks following PTCA.

Methods

A cohort study was carried out based on nationwide registration of all coronary angioplasty procedures in Sweden between 1989 and 1998. The study encompassed a total of 23,097 PTCA patients followed up for cancer outcomes in the Swedish Cancer Register until December 31, 2000. The mean and median follow-up times were 4.8 and 4.5 years, respectively. The main outcome measures were standardized incidence ratios of cancer.

Results

Except for a transient excess of lung cancers, observed number of cancers in patients who had undergone coronary angioplasty did not differ from those expected in the general population. If anything, the overall cancer risk was lower in the PTCA group (SIR 0.94; 95% CI 0.88–0.99). In particular, no increased risks were detected for leukemias or thyroid cancer.

Conclusion

There was no indication of increased risks of leukemia or cancers overall in PTCA patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T Nilsson L Bergfeldt B Aberg J Hultman SE Svensson L Wallentin (2001) ArticleTitle[Policy document. Catheter-based diagnosis and treatment of coronary diseases] Lakartidningen 98 303–305

    Google Scholar 

  2. PL Pattee PC Johns RJ Chambers (1993) ArticleTitleRadiation risk to patients from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty J Am Coll Cardiol 22 1044–1051

    Google Scholar 

  3. A Berrington Gonzalez Particlede S Darby (2004) ArticleTitleRisk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: Estimates for the UK and 14 other countries Lancet 363 345–351

    Google Scholar 

  4. R Padovani G Bernardi MR Malisan E Vano G Morocutti PM Fioretti (2001) ArticleTitlePatient dose related to the complexity of interventional cardiology procedures Radiat Prot Dosimetry 94 189–192

    Google Scholar 

  5. E Kuon JB Dahm M Schmitt C Glaser O Gefeller A Pfahlberg (2003) ArticleTitleShort communication: Time of day influences patient radiation exposure from percutaneous cardiac interventions Br J Radiol 76 189–191

    Google Scholar 

  6. InstitutionalAuthorNameSwedish Cancer Registry (2002) Cancer incidence in Sweden 2000 Socialstyrelsen Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  7. InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Board of Health and Welfare (2000) Dödsorsaker [Causes of death 1997] Centre for Epidemiology, National Board of Health and Welfare Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  8. E Sovik NE Klow J Hellesnes J Lykke (1996) ArticleTitleRadiation-induced skin injury after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Case report Acta Radiol 37 305–306

    Google Scholar 

  9. TB Shope (1996) ArticleTitleRadiation-induced skin injuries from fluoroscopy Radiographics 16 1195–1199

    Google Scholar 

  10. JL Poletti (1997) ArticleTitleRadiation injury to skin following a cardiac interventional procedure Australas Radiol 41 82–83

    Google Scholar 

  11. DA Clark (2000) ArticleTitleHow much is too much? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 51 265

    Google Scholar 

  12. SG Fransson J Persliden (2000) ArticleTitlePatient radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention Acta Radiol 41 142–144

    Google Scholar 

  13. S Betsou EP Efstathopoulos D Katritsis K Faulkner G Panayiotakis (1998) ArticleTitlePatient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures Br J Radiol 71 634–639

    Google Scholar 

  14. UNSCEAR, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2000. Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. United Nations, New York

  15. P Vineis M Alavanja P Buffler E Fontham S Franceschi YT Gao et al. (2004) ArticleTitleTobacco and cancer: Recent epidemiological evidence J Natl Cancer Inst 96 99–106

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation (grant no. 2001-0386), Karolinska Research Funds and the Swedish Council for Social Research. We thank Max Köster, Centre for Epidemiology, National Board of Health and Welfare for providing data for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Lambe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambe, M., Hall, P., Granath, F. et al. Coronary Angioplasty and Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Sweden. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28, 36–38 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-004-0059-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-004-0059-8

Key words

Navigation