CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 36–38 | Cite as

Coronary Angioplasty and Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Sweden

  • M. LambeEmail author
  • P. Hall
  • F. Granath
  • O. Sadr Azodi
  • T. Nilsson



Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has become the reperfusion method of choice in patients with coronary artery disease. This sometimes complicated and lengthy procedure is performed using fluoroscopy and cineradiography or digital imaging, which may result in considerable exposure to ionizing radiation. Possible cancer risks in PTCA patients have been discussed, but never before examined in a population-based setting.


To assess the cancer risks following PTCA.


A cohort study was carried out based on nationwide registration of all coronary angioplasty procedures in Sweden between 1989 and 1998. The study encompassed a total of 23,097 PTCA patients followed up for cancer outcomes in the Swedish Cancer Register until December 31, 2000. The mean and median follow-up times were 4.8 and 4.5 years, respectively. The main outcome measures were standardized incidence ratios of cancer.


Except for a transient excess of lung cancers, observed number of cancers in patients who had undergone coronary angioplasty did not differ from those expected in the general population. If anything, the overall cancer risk was lower in the PTCA group (SIR 0.94; 95% CI 0.88–0.99). In particular, no increased risks were detected for leukemias or thyroid cancer.


There was no indication of increased risks of leukemia or cancers overall in PTCA patients.

Key words

Cancer Cohort study Coronary angioplasty  Leukemia Radiation Sweden 



This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation (grant no. 2001-0386), Karolinska Research Funds and the Swedish Council for Social Research. We thank Max Köster, Centre for Epidemiology, National Board of Health and Welfare for providing data for the study.


  1. 1.
    Nilsson, T, Bergfeldt, L, Aberg, B, Hultman, J, Svensson, SE, Wallentin, L 2001[Policy document. Catheter-based diagnosis and treatment of coronary diseases]Lakartidningen98303305Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pattee, PL, Johns, PC, Chambers, RJ 1993Radiation risk to patients from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyJ Am Coll Cardiol2210441051Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berrington Gonzalez, A, Darby, S 2004Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: Estimates for the UK and 14 other countriesLancet363345351Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Padovani, R, Bernardi, G, Malisan, MR, Vano, E, Morocutti, G, Fioretti, PM 2001Patient dose related to the complexity of interventional cardiology proceduresRadiat Prot Dosimetry94189192Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuon, E, Dahm, JB, Schmitt, M, Glaser, C, Gefeller, O, Pfahlberg, A 2003Short communication: Time of day influences patient radiation exposure from percutaneous cardiac interventionsBr J Radiol76189191Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Swedish Cancer Registry2002Cancer incidence in Sweden 2000SocialstyrelsenStockholmGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Board of Health and Welfare2000Dödsorsaker [Causes of death 1997]Centre for Epidemiology, National Board of Health and WelfareStockholmGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sovik, E, Klow, NE, Hellesnes, J, Lykke, J 1996Radiation-induced skin injury after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Case reportActa Radiol37305306Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shope, TB 1996Radiation-induced skin injuries from fluoroscopyRadiographics1611951199Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poletti, JL 1997Radiation injury to skin following a cardiac interventional procedureAustralas Radiol418283Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clark, DA 2000How much is too much? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv51265Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fransson, SG, Persliden, J 2000Patient radiation exposure during coronary angiography and interventionActa Radiol41142144Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Betsou, S, Efstathopoulos, EP, Katritsis, D, Faulkner, K, Panayiotakis, G 1998Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization proceduresBr J Radiol71634639Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    UNSCEAR, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2000. Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vineis, P, Alavanja, M, Buffler, P, Fontham, E, Franceschi, S, Gao, YT,  et al. 2004Tobacco and cancer: Recent epidemiological evidenceJ Natl Cancer Inst9699106Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Lambe
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Hall
    • 1
  • F. Granath
    • 2
  • O. Sadr Azodi
    • 3
  • T. Nilsson
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Unit of Clinical EpidemiologyKarolinska Hospital StockholmSweden
  3. 3.MEB Summer Research SchoolSweden
  4. 4.Department of CardiologySahlgrenska HospitalGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations