Skip to main content
Log in

Response of Balloon-Expandable Endoprosthetic Metallic Stents Subjected to Over-Expansion In Vitro

  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We attempted to evaluate the in vitro behavior and performance of balloon-expandable endoprosthetic metallic stents subjected to over-expansion (OE). Seventy-two balloon-expandable endoprosthetic stents, representing 22 models from six manufacturers, were over- expanded in vitro. Stents were initially expanded to their maximum manufacturer- recommended diameter and then over-expanded incrementally to their endpoints. Endpoints for OE were either stent disarticulation or an inability to undergo further expansion despite balloon insufflation to maximum burst pressure. Measurements of stent dimensions were recorded at each overexpanded diameter and comparisons were made to manufacturer’s specifications. A total of 288 balloon-driven expansions were performed on 72 stents. Sixteen stents were expanded to large diameters (≥ 16 mm), 20 stents underwent OE of 50% or greater. One model tended to disarticulate after OE greater than 50%. There were five models that had a tendency to disarticulate after minimal OE. Five models were resistant to OE (25% or less OE) but did not disarticulate. Nearly all stents showed some degree of foreshortening with OE, while 36 stents underwent foreshortening of 30% or more. Models that are not recommended for OE include Intrastent, Intrastent DoubleStrut, NIR Royale and Omniflex. Good candidates for OE include Intrastent DoubleStrut LD, Palmaz large, Medtronic Extra Support Biliary Plus and Medtronic Flexible Biliary. Palmaz XL remains the only model available for expansion from 20 to 28 mm in diameter. For the remaining stents, OE is possible, however, caution should be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F Flueckiger H Sternthal GE Klein (1994) ArticleTitleStrength, elasticity and plasticity of expandable metal stents: In vitro studies with three types of stress. J Vasc Interv Radiol 5 745–750 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD1Mzhs1E%3D Occurrence Handle8000124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. SH Duda J Wiskirchen G Tepe (2000) ArticleTitlePhysical properties of endovascular stents: An experimental comparison. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11 645–654 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vosFSiuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10834499

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. JF Dyet WG Watts DF Ettles (2000) ArticleTitleMechanical properties of metallic stents: How do these properties influence the choice of stent for specific lesions? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 23 47–54 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002709910007 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7itlyiug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10656906

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. C Dumoulin B Cochelin (2000) ArticleTitleMechanical behavior modelling of balloon-expandable stents. J Biomech 33 1461–1470 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00098-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FltlWqsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10940405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. JA Ormiston SR Dixon MWI Webster (2000) ArticleTitleStent longitudinal flexibility: A comparison of 13 stent designs before and after balloon expansion. Cathet Cardiol Interv 50 120–124 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200005)50:1<120::AID-CCD26>3.0.CO;2-T Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ns1KjtQ%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. CH Timaran SL Stevens MB Freeman (2001) ArticleTitleExternal iliac and common iliac artery angioplasty and stenting in men and women. J Vasc Surg 34 440–446 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mva.2001.117148 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvptVOgug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11533595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. ZJ Haskal JM LaBerge RL Gordon (1993) ArticleTitleResponse of Wallstents to dilation: Therapeutic implications. J Vasc Interv Radiol 5 635–637

    Google Scholar 

  8. C Hehrlein JJ DeVries A Arab (2002) ArticleTitleRole of the dogbone effect of balloon-expandable stents: Quantitative coronary analysis of DUET and NIR stent implantation introducing a novel indexing system. J Invasive Cardiol 14 59–65 Occurrence Handle11818639

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. WC Culp TC McCowan RP Lieberman (1996) ArticleTitleBiliary stricures in liver transplant recipients: Treatment with metal stents. Radiology 199 IssueID2 339–346 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB3c3ns1I%3D Occurrence Handle8668775

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. V. Hofmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montague, B., Kakimoto, W., Arepally, A. et al. Response of Balloon-Expandable Endoprosthetic Metallic Stents Subjected to Over-Expansion In Vitro . CVIR 27, 158–163 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-003-4600-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-003-4600-y

Keywords

Navigation