Skip to main content
Log in

Transluminally Placed Endovascular Grafts for Venous Lesions in Patients on Hemodialysis

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This report summarizes a feasibility study of transluminally placed endovascular grafts (TPEG) using pre-expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) to treat venous abnormalities in patients on hemodialysis. Seventeen patients with peripheral (n = 11) or central (n = 6) venous lesions were treated with TPEG devices. Covered Gianturco stents were used for the peripheral lesions and covered Palmaz stents were used for central lesions. Venous abnormalities included vascular rupture after balloon angioplasty or surgical thrombectomy (n = 4), stenosis associated with an aneurysm (n = 2) and occlusive disease and central stenoses not responsive to balloon angioplasty (n = 11). The mean primary patency period was 37 days. The mean secondary patency period was 215 days. At 60, 180, and 360 days the primary and secondary patency rates were 40%, 32%, and 32%, and 70%, 55%, and 39%, respectively. Follow-up studies have shown various outcomes of the implanted TPEG devices, which have included stenoses within the TPEG (n = 2), stenoses central to the TPEG (n = 1), stenoses peripheral to the TPEG (n = 3), acute thrombosis extending to the TPEG without a stenosis (n = 1), graft abandoned with patent TPEG (n = 6), and TPEG patent within primary patency period at last follow-up (n = 4). The TPEG devices, made with pre-expanded PTFE, appear safe in the short term, do not prevent progressive dialysis access site failure, and need to be compared to PTA and endovascular stenting in a randomized prospective trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SF Quinn ES Schuman TA Demlow BA Standage JW Ragsdale JW Green RC Sheley (1995) ArticleTitlePercutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus endovascular stent placement in the treatment of venous stenoses in patients undergoing hemodialysis: Intermediate results. JVIR 6 851–855 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD3czjt1w%3D Occurrence Handle8850659

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. GA Beathard (1992) ArticleTitleGianturco self-expanding stent in the treatment of stenosis in dialysis access grafts. Kidney Int 43 872–877

    Google Scholar 

  3. EK Hoffer S Sultan MM Herskowitz ID Daniels SJ Sclafani (1997) ArticleTitleProspective randomized trial of a metallic intravascular stent in hemodialysis graft maintenance. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8 965–973 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FmtVertA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9399465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. MR Sapoval LA Turmel-Rodrigues AC Raynaud P Bourquelot H Rodrigue JC Gaux (1996) ArticleTitleCragg covered stents in hemodialysis access: Initial and midterm results. JVIR 7 335–342 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA2MvisFU%3D Occurrence Handle8761808

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. RE England A Jackson (1993) ArticleTitleImaging of dialysis access: A review of 67 failing fistulas investigated by intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Br J Radiol 66 32–36 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC2MzlsVI%3D Occurrence Handle8428248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. SF Quinn L Hall ES Schuman GF Gross BT Uchida BA Standage J Rosch K Ivancev (1992) ArticleTitleEndovascular stents in hemodialysis patients. Radiology 183 499–504 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B38%2FpvVE%3D Occurrence Handle1561357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. GA Beathard (1992) ArticleTitlePercutaneous transvenous angioplasty in the treatment of vascular access stenosis. Kidney Int 42 1390–1397 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC3MnjsVQ%3D Occurrence Handle1474770

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. R Shoenfeld H Hermans A Novick B Brener P Cordero D Eisenbud S Mody R Goldenkranz V Parsonnet (1994) ArticleTitleStenting of proximal venous obstructions to maintain hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 19 532–539 Occurrence Handle8126868

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. L Turmel-Rodrigues J Pengloan D Blanchier (1993) ArticleTitleInsufficient dialysis shunts: Improved long-term patency rates with close hemodynamic monitoring, repeated percutaneous balloon angioplasty, and stent placement. Radiology 187 273–278 Occurrence Handle8451428

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. AC Raynaud CY Angel MR Sapoval B Beyssen JY Pagny M Auguste (1998) ArticleTitleTreatment of hemodialysis access rupture during PTA with Wallstent implantation. JVIR 9 437–442 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3nvVKltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9618102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. B Funaki GX Szymski JA Leef JD Rosenblum R Burke CA Hackworth (1997) ArticleTitleWallstent deployment to salvage dialysis graft thrombolysis complicated by venous rupture: Early and intermediate results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169 1435–1437

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.F. Quinn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quinn, S., Kim, J. & Sheley, R. Transluminally Placed Endovascular Grafts for Venous Lesions in Patients on Hemodialysis . CVIR 26, 365–369 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-003-2705-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-003-2705-y

Keywords

Navigation