Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Incidence of Central Vein Stenosis and Occlusion Following Upper Extremity PICC and Port Placement

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of central vein stenosis and occlusion following upper extremity placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) and venous ports. One hundred fifty-four patients who underwent venography of the ipsilateral central veins prior to initial and subsequent venous access device insertion were retrospectively identified. All follow-up venograms were interpreted at the time of catheter placement by one interventional radiologist over a 5-year period and compared to the findings on initial venography. For patients with central vein abnormalities, hospital and home infusion service records and radiology reports were reviewed to determine catheter dwell time and potential alternative etiologies of central vein stenosis or occlusion. The effect of catheter caliber and dwell time on development of central vein abnormalities was evaluated. Venography performed prior to initial catheter placement showed that 150 patients had normal central veins. Three patients had central vein stenosis, and one had central vein occlusion. Subsequent venograms (n = 154) at the time of additional venous access device placement demonstrated 8 patients with occlusions and 10 with stenoses. Three of the 18 patients with abnormal follow-up venograms were found to have potential alternative causes of central vein abnormalities. Excluding these 3 patients and the 4 patients with abnormal initial venograms, a 7% incidence of central vein stenosis or occlusion was found in patients with prior indwelling catheters and normal initial venograms. Catheter caliber showed no effect on the subsequent development of central vein abnormalities. Patients who developed new or worsened central vein stenosis or occlusion had significantly (p = 0.03) longer catheter dwell times than patients without central vein abnormalities. New central vein stenosis or occlusion occurred in 7% of patients following upper arm placement of venous access devices. Patients with longer catheter dwell time were more likely to develop central vein abnormalities. In order to preserve vascular access for dialysis fistulae and grafts and adhere to Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines, alternative venous access sites should be considered for patients with chronic renal insufficiency and end-stage renal disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JF Cardella PS Fox JB Lawler (1993) ArticleTitleInterventional radiologic placement of peripherally inserted catheters. JVIR 4 653–660 Occurrence Handle8219560

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MJ Foley (1995) ArticleTitleRadiologic placement of long-term central venous peripheral access system ports (PAS Port): Results in 150 patients. JVIR 6 255–262 Occurrence Handle7787360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DM Hovsepian J Bonn DJ Eschelman (1993) ArticleTitleTechniques for peripherally inserted central venous catheters. JVIR 4 795–803 Occurrence Handle8281003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. KL Sullivan J Bonn MJ Shapiro GA Gardiner (1995) ArticleTitleVenography with carbon dioxide as a contrast agent. CVIR 18 141–145

    Google Scholar 

  5. J Bonn DJ Eschelman KL Sullivan GA Jr. Gardiner (1994) ArticleTitlePeripheral insertion of central venous catheters guided by means of carbon dioxide contrast agents. JVIR 5 32

    Google Scholar 

  6. ST Hahn T Pfammatter KJ Cho (1995) ArticleTitleCarbon dioxide gas as a venous contrast agent to guide upper-arm insertion of central venous catheters. CVIR 18 146–149

    Google Scholar 

  7. PC Shetty MK Mody DJ Kastan RP Sharma MW Burke C Venugopal TH Burke (1997) ArticleTitleOutcome of 350 implanted chest ports placed by interventional radiologists. JVIR 8 IssueID6 991–995

    Google Scholar 

  8. KR Simpson DM Hovsepian D Picus (1997) ArticleTitleInterventional radiologic placement of chest wall ports: Results and complications in 161 consecutive placements. JVIR 8 189–195 Occurrence Handle9083981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. JF Cardella K Cardella N Bacci PS Fox JH Post (1996) ArticleTitleCumulative experience with 1,273 peripherally inserted central catheters at a single institution. JVIR 7 5–13 Occurrence Handle8773968

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JR Grove WC Pevec (2000) ArticleTitleVenous thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters. JVIR 11 IssueID7 837–840 Occurrence Handle10928518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. AW Allen JL Megargell DB Brown FC Lynch H Singh Y Singh PN Waybill (2000) ArticleTitleVenous thrombosis associated with the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters. JVIR 11 IssueID10 1309–1314 Occurrence Handle11099241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MA Ryder (1993) ArticleTitlePeripherally inserted central venous catheters. Nurs Clin North Am 28 IssueID4 937–971

    Google Scholar 

  13. L Balestreri M DeCicco M Matovic F Coran S Morassut (1995) ArticleTitleCentral venous catheter-related thrombosis in clinically significant symptomatic oncologic patients. Eur J Radiol 20 108–111 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0720-048X(95)00633-2 Occurrence Handle7588863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MD Karim Valji (1999) Vascular and Interventional Radiology WB Saunders Philadelphia 320

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative Guidelines for Vascular Access (2001) American Journal of Kidney Disease, Vol. 37, No. 1 (Suppl 1) S141–S149

  16. LU Mailloux B Napolitano AG Bellucci M Vernace BM Wilkes RT Mossey (1994) ArticleTitleRenal vascular disease causing end-stage renal disease, incidence, clinical correlates, and outcomes: A 20-year clinical experience. Am J Kidney Dis 24 IssueID4 622–629 Occurrence Handle7942820

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. AH Mokdad ES Ford BA Bowman DE Nelson MM Engelgau JS. Vinic Marks (2001) ArticleTitleThe continuing increase of diabetes in the US. Diabetes Care 24 IssueID2 412

    Google Scholar 

  18. InstitutionalAuthorNameHealth Care Food Nutr Focus (2001) ArticleTitleDiabetes in the United States. It is still on the rise, according to the CDC’s latest report . 17 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  19. KM Sasadeusz SO Trerotola H Shah J Namyslowski MS Johnson KP Moresco NH Patel (1999) ArticleTitleTunneled jugular small-bore central catheters as an alternative to peripherally inserted central catheters for intermediate-term venous access in patients with hemodialysis and chronic renal insufficiency. Radiology 213 303–306 Occurrence Handle10540677

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. JK Brown-Smith MH Stoner (1990) ArticleTitleTunnelled catheter thrombosis: Factors related to incidence. Oncol Nurs Forum 17 543 Occurrence Handle2399167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. ML Goodwin I Carlson (1993) ArticleTitleThe peripherally inserted central catheter. J Int Nurs 16 IssueID2 92–99

    Google Scholar 

  22. JJ Crowley JK Pereira LH Harris CJ Becker (1997) ArticleTitlePeripherally inserted central catheters: Experience in 523 children. Radiology 204 617–621 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH38vjtFY%3D Occurrence Handle9280234

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. EH Kincaid PW Davis MC Chang JM Fenstermaker TC Pennell (1999) ArticleTitle“Blind” placement of long-term central venous access devices: Evaluation of 589 consecutive procedures. Am Surg 65 IssueID6 520–523 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3pt1ehtQ%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. MC Horattas J Trupiano S Hopkins D Pasini C Martino A Murty (2001) ArticleTitleChanging concepts in long-term central venous access: Catheter selection and cost savings. Am J Inf Contr 29 32–40 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mic.2001.111536

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Jefferson Medical College/Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Suite 4200 Gibbon Building, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

    Carin F. Gonsalves, David J. Eschelman, Kevin L. Sullivan, Nancy DuBois & Joseph Bonn

Authors
  1. Carin F. Gonsalves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David J. Eschelman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kevin L. Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nancy DuBois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joseph Bonn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carin F. Gonsalves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonsalves, C., Eschelman, D., Sullivan, K. et al. Incidence of Central Vein Stenosis and Occlusion Following Upper Extremity PICC and Port Placement . CVIR 26, 123–127 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-002-2628-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-002-2628-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation