The stability of anhydrous phase B, Mg14Si5O24, at mantle transition zone conditions
- 497 Downloads
The stability of anhydrous phase B, Mg14Si5O24, has been determined in the pressure range of 14–21 GPa and the temperature range of 1100–1700 °C with both normal and reversal experiments using multi-anvil apparatus. Our results demonstrate that anhydrous phase B is stable at pressure–temperature conditions corresponding to the shallow depth region of the mantle’s transition zone and it decomposes into periclase and wadsleyite at greater depths. The decomposition boundary of anhydrous phase B into wadsleyite and periclase has a positive phase transition slope and can be expressed by the following equation: P(GPa) = 7.5 + 6.6 × 10−3 T (°C). This result is consistent with a recent result on the decomposition boundary of anhydrous phase B (Kojitani et al., Am Miner 102:2032–2044, 2017). However, our phase boundary deviates significantly from this previous study at temperatures < 1400 °C. Subducting carbonates may be reduced at depths > 250 km, which could contribute ferropericlase (Mg, Fe)O or magnesiowustite (Fe, Mg)O into the deep mantle. Incongruent melting of hydrous peridotite may also produce MgO-rich compounds. Anh-B could form in these conditions due to reactions between Mg-rich oxides and silicates. Anh-B might provide a new interpretation for the origin of diamonds containing ferropericlase–olivine inclusions and chromitites which have been found to have ultrahigh-pressure characteristics. We propose that directly touching ferropericlase–olivine inclusions found in natural diamonds might be the retrogressive products of anhydrous phase B decomposing via the reaction (Mg,Fe)14Si5O24 (Anh-B) = (Mg,Fe)2SiO4 (olivine) + (Mg,Fe)O (periclase). This decomposition may occur during the transportation of the host diamonds from their formation depths of < 500 km in the upper part of the mantle transition zone to the surface.
KeywordsAnhydrous phase B Phase transition Raman spectroscopy High-P chromite Diamond inclusions
E.O. acknowledges the financial support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 15H05748). A.S. acknowledges the financial support from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (15H05826, 15H05828, and 15K21712). Z.J. thanks the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41174076). L.Y. is supported by the International Joint Graduate Program in Earth and Environmental Science (GP-EES), Tohoku University. D.F. acknowledges DFG funding of the International Research and Training Group “Deep Volatile Cycles”.
- Fei Y, Orman JV, Li J, Westrenen WV, Sanloup C, Minarik W, Hirose K, Komabayashi T, Walter M, Funakoshi K (2004) Experimentally determined postspinel transformation boundary in Mg2SiO4 using MgO as an internal pressure standard and its geophysical implications. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002562 Google Scholar
- Ganguly J, Frost DJ (2006) Stability of anhydrous phase B: experimental studies and implications for phase relations in subducting slab and the X discontinuity in the mantle. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 111:B06203Google Scholar
- Hazen RM et al (1992) Crystal chemistry of Fe-bearing anhydrous phase B: implications for transition zone mineralogy. Am Miner 77:217–220Google Scholar
- Herzberg C, Gasparik T (1989) Melting experiments on chondrite at high pressures: stability of anhydrous Phase B. Eos 70:484Google Scholar
- Inoue T, Sawamoto H (1992) High pressure melting of pyrolite under hydrous condition and its geophysical implications. In: Syono Y, Manghnani MH (eds) High-pressure research: application to earth and planetary sciences. Terra, Tokyo and AGU, Washington, DC, pp 323–331Google Scholar
- Ohtani E, Suzuki A, Kato T (1998) Flotation of olivine and diamond in mantle melt at high pressure: implications for fractionation in the deep mantle and ultradeep origin of diamond. In: Manghnani MH, Yagi T (eds) Properties of Earth and planetary materials at high pressure and temperature. Geophysical monograph, vol 101. American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, 227–239Google Scholar