Physics and Chemistry of Minerals

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 114–125 | Cite as

Experimental and theoretical bond critical point properties for model electron density distributions for earth materials

  • G. V. Gibbs
  • D. F. Cox
  • K. M. Rosso
  • A. Kirfel
  • T. Lippmann
  • P. Blaha
  • K. Schwarz
Original papers


Generalized X-ray scattering factor model experimental electron density distributions and bond critical point, bcp, properties generated in recent studies for the earth materials stishovite, forsterite, fayalite and cuprite with high energy single crystal synchrotron X-ray diffraction data and those generated with high resolution diffraction data for coesite and senarmonite were found to be adequate and in relatively good agreement, ~5% on average, with those calculated with quantum chemical methods with relatively robust basis sets. High resolution low energy single crystal diffraction data, recorded for the molecular sieve AlPO4-15, were also found to yield model electron density distribution values at the bcp points for the AlO and PO bonded interactions that are in relatively good to moderately good agreement with the theoretical values, but the Laplacian values of the distribution at the points for the two bonded interactions were found to be in relatively poor agreement. In several cases, experimental bcp properties, generated with conventional low energy X-ray diffraction data for several rock forming minerals, were found overall to be in poorer agreement with the theoretical properties. The overall agreement between theoretical bcp properties generated with computational quantum methods and experimental properties generated with synchrotron high energy radiation not only provides a basis for using computational strategies for studying and modeling structures and their electron density distributions, but it also provides a basis for improving our understanding of the crystal chemistry and bonded interactions for earth materials. Theoretical bond critical point properties generated with computational quantum methods are believed to rival the accuracy of those determined experimentally. As such the calculations provide a powerful and efficient method for evaluating electron density distributions and the bonded interactions for a wide range of earth materials.


Synchrotron diffraction data Silica polymorphs Forsterite AlPO4-15 Fibrous zeolites Cuprite Danburite Bromellite Senarmonite 


  1. Abramov Y, Volkov A, Coppens P (1999) On the evaluation of molecular dipole moments from multipole refinements of X-ray diffraction data. Chem Phys Lett 31:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubert A, Porcher F, Souhassou M, Lecomte C (2003) Characterization of intra-framework and guest/host interactions in the AlPO4-15 molecular sieve by charge-density analysis. Acta Cryst B59:687–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bader RFW (1990) Atoms in molecules. Oxford Science Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Bader RFW, MacDougall PJ (1985) Toward a theory of chemical reactivity based on charge density. JACS 107:6788–6795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boisen MB, Gibbs GV, Bukowinski MST (1994) Framework silica structures generated using simulated annealing with a potential-energy function-based on an H6Si2O7 molecule. Phys Chem Miner 21:269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boisen MB, Gibbs GV, O’Keeffe M, Bartelmehs KL (1999) A generation of framework structures for the tectosilicates using a molecular-based potential function and simulated annealing strategies. Micro Meso Mater 29:219–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown ID and Shannon RD (1973) Empirical bond-strength bond-length curves for oxides. Acta Cryst A 29:266–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Downs JW (1991) Electrostatic properties of minerals from X-ray diffraction data: a guide for accurate atomistic models In: Ganguly J (ed) Diffusion, atomic ordering, and mass transport, advances in physical geochemistry, vol 8. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Downs JW (1995) The electron density distribution of coesite. J Phys Chem 99:6849–6856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Downs JW, Swope RJ (1992) The Laplacian of the electron density and the electrostatic potential of danburite, CaB2Si2O8. J Phys Chem 96:4834–4840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flensburg C, Larsen S, Stewart RF (1995) Experimental charge density study of methylammonium hydrogen succinate monohydrate: a salt with a very short O–H–O hydrogen bond. J Phys Chem 99:10130–10141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gatti C (1997) TOPOND96 User’s Manual, CNR–CSRSRC, Milano, Italy, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  13. Gibbs GV (1982) Molecules as models for bonding in silicates. Am Mineral 67:421–450Google Scholar
  14. Gibbs GV, Boisen MB, Hill FC, Tamada O, Downs RT (1998) SiO and GeO bonded interactions as inferred from the bond critical point properties of electron density distributions. Phys Chem Miner 25:574–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibbs GV, Boisen MB, Beverly LL, Rosso KM (2001) A computational quantum study of the bonded interactions in earth materials and structurally and chemically related molecules, Molecular modeling theory. In: Cygan RT, Kubicki JD (eds) Applications in the geosciences. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, vol 42. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington DC, 345–382Google Scholar
  16. Gibbs GV, Whitten EW, Spackman MA, Stimpfl M, Downs RT, Carducci MD (2003) An exploration of theoretical and experimental electron density distributions and SiO bonded interactions for the silica polymorph coesite. J Phys Chem B 2003:12996–13006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibbs GV, Rosso KM, Cox DF, Ross DF, Boisen MB (2003) A physical basis for Pauling’s definition of bond strength. Phys Chem Miner 30:317–320Google Scholar
  18. Gibbs GV, Cox DF, Rosso KM, (2004) A connection between empirical bond strength and the localization of electron density at the bond critical points of the SiO bonds in silicates. J Phys Chem A 108:7643–7645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ivanov YU, Belokoneva EL, Protas J, Hansen NK, Tsirelson VG (1998) Multipole analysis of the electron density in topaz using X-ray diffraction data. Acta Cryst B 54:774–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirfel A, Gibbs GV (2000) Experimental electron density distributions and bonded interactions for fibrous zeolites natrolite, mesolite and scolecite and related materials. Phys Chem Miner 27:270–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirfel A, Lippmann T (2002) Electron density distribution in fayalite, Fe2SiO4: a high energy synchrotron radiation study.
  22. Kirfel A, Krane HG, Blaha P, Schwarz K, Lippmann T (2001) Electron-density in stishovite, SiO2: a new high-energy synchrotron-radiation study. Acta Cryst A 57:663–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koritsanszky TS, Coppens P (2001) Chemical applications of X-ray charge-density analysis. Chem Rev 101:1583–1627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kraka E, Cremer D (1990) Chemical implications of local features on the electron density distribution, Theoretical models of chemical bonding. In: Maksic ZB (ed) Part 2: the concept of the chemical bond. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 453–538Google Scholar
  25. Kuntzinger S, Ghermani NE, Dusausoy Y, Lecomte C (1998) Distribution and topology of the electron density in a aluminosilicate compound from high resolution X-ray diffraction data: the case of scolecite. Acta Cryst B 54:819–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lasaga AC, Gibbs GV (1990) Ab-initio quantum mechanical calculations of water-rock interactions: adsorption and hydrolysis reactions. Am J Sci 290:263–295Google Scholar
  27. Leach AR (2001) Molecular modeling, principles and applications. Prentice Hall, New York, pp 1–744Google Scholar
  28. Lippmann T, Schneider JR (2000) Topological analysis of cuprite, Cu2O, using high energy synchrotron radiation data. Acta Cryst A 56:575–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lippmann T, Blaha P, Anderson NH, Poulsen HF, Wolf T, Schneider JR, Schwarz KH (2003) Charge density analysis of YBa2Cu3O6.98: comparison of theoretical and experimental results. Acta Cryst A 59:437–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luaña V, Costales A, More–Sánchez P, Martin Pendás A (2003) Ions in crystals: the topology of the electron density in ionic materials. 4. The danburite (CaB2Si2O8) case and the occurrence of oxide–oxide bond paths in crystals. J Phys Chem B 107:4912–4921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pauling L (1929) The principles determining the structure of complex ionic crystals. JACS 51:1010–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pelmenschikov A, Strandh H, Petterson LGN, Leszcynski J (2000) Lattice resistance to hydrolysis of SiOSi bonds of silicate minerals: Ab initio calculations of a single water attack onto the (001) and (111) β–cristobalite surfaces. J Phys Chem B 104:5779–5783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Puig–Molina A, Alvarez–Larena A, Piniella JF, Howard ST, Baert F (1998) The electron distribution in the nonlinear optical material 2–amino–5–nitropyridium dihydrogen phosphate. Struct Chem 9:395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saunders VR, Dovesi R, Roetti C, Causá M, Harrison NM Orlando R, Aprá E (1998) CRYSTAL98 User’s Manual, University of Torino, Torino, Italy, pp 1–170Google Scholar
  35. Slouf M, Holy A, Petricek V, Cisarova I (2002) Charge density study of hydrogen ([2,4-diaminopyrimidin-1-io)methyl]phosphonate monohydrate. Acta Cryst B 58:519–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stewart RF (1969) Generalized X-ray scattering factors. J Chem Phys 51:4569–4577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stewart RF (1976) Electron population analysis with rigid pseudoatoms. Acta Cryst A 32:565–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. R Volkov A, Coppens P (2001) Critical examination of the radial functions in the Hansen–Coppens multipole model through topological analysis of primary and refined theoretical densities. Acta Cryst A 57:395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Volkov A, Abramov Y, Coppens P, Gatti C (2000) On the origin of topological differences between experimental and theoretical crystal charge densities. Acta Cryst A 56:332–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Whitten AE, Dittrich B, Spackman MA, Turner P, Brown TC (2004) Charge density analysis of two polymorphs of antimony(III) oxide. R Soc Chem Dalton Trans 102:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. V. Gibbs
    • 1
  • D. F. Cox
    • 2
  • K. M. Rosso
    • 3
  • A. Kirfel
    • 4
  • T. Lippmann
    • 5
  • P. Blaha
    • 6
  • K. Schwarz
    • 6
  1. 1.Departments of Geosciences, Materials Science and Engineering and MathematicsVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  3. 3.W.R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences LaboratoryPacific Northwest National LaboratoryUSA
  4. 4.Mineralogisch-Petrologisches InstitutUniversität BonnBonnGermany
  5. 5.GKSSGeesthachtGermany
  6. 6.Institut für MaterialchemieTechnische Universität WienWienAustria

Personalised recommendations