Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Authors’ Reply: Are LMICs Achieving the Lancet Commission Global Benchmark for Surgical Volumes? A Systematic Review

  • Reply, Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Zadey S (2023) Letter to Editor: are LMICs achieving the Lancet commission global benchmark for surgical volumes? A systematic review. World J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07029-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Patil P, Nathani P, Bakker JM et al (2023) Are LMICs achieving the Lancet commission global benchmark for surgical volumes? A systematic review. World J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07029-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Briscoe S et al. (2022) Chapter 4: searching for and selecting studies [Internet]. . Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04

  4. Bjerring AW, Lier ME, Rød SM et al (2015) Assessing cesarean section and inguinal hernia repair as proxy indicators of the total number of surgeries performed in Sierra Leone in 2012. Surg (United States) 157(5):836–842

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kushner AL, Groen RS, Kingham TP (2010) Percentage of cesarean sections among total surgical procedures in sub-Saharan Africa: possible indicator of the overall adequacy of surgical care. World J Surg 34(9):2007–2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0653-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L et al (2015) Global Surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 386(9993):569–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Löfgren J, Kadobera D, Forsberg BC et al (2015) District-level surgery in Uganda: Indications, interventions and perioperative mortality. Surg (United States) 158(1):7–16

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ajiko MM, Davé D, Feldhaus I et al (2017) Patterns of surgical presentation at an African regional referral hospital: surveillance as a step towards improving access to care. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43(2):265–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reshamwalla S, Gobeze AA, Ghosh S et al (2012) Snapshot of surgical activity in rural Ethiopia: is enough being done? World J Surg 36(5):1049–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1511-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. The World Bank Low & Middle income Counries [Internet]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/country/XO.

  11. Godin K, Stapleton J, Kirkpatrick SI et al (2015) Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Syst Rev 4(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0125-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Higgins Julian TJ. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [Internet]. . Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current.

  13. Zadey S, Nickenig Vissoci JR (2021) Analyzing surgical volumes, rates, and need in rural India. medRxiv. 1(165): 1–13

  14. Gyedu A, Lester L, Stewart B et al (2020) Estimating obstetric and gynecologic surgical rate: a benchmark of surgical capacity building in Ghana. Int J Gynecol Obstet 148(2):205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hughes CD, McClain CD, Hagander L et al (2013) Ratio of cesarean deliveries to total operations and surgeon nationality are potential proxies for surgical capacity in central Haiti. World J Surg 37(7):1526–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1794-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobhojit Roy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patil, P., Nathani, P., Bakker, J. et al. Authors’ Reply: Are LMICs Achieving the Lancet Commission Global Benchmark for Surgical Volumes? A Systematic Review. World J Surg 47, 3439–3440 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07171-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07171-6

Navigation