Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Conservative Treatment and Surgery Treatment for Acute Scaphoid Fracture: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Chen S, Zhang C, Jiang B et al (2023) Comparison of conservative treatment and surgery treatment for acute scaphoid fracture: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 47:611–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06833-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, Foley NC et al (2005) The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad scale in stroke rehabilitation literature. J Clin Epidemiol 58:668–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saeden B, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S et al (2001) Fracture of the carpal scaphoid: a prospective, randomised 12-year follow-up comparing operative and conservative treatment. J Bone Jt Surg 83:230–234. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.83B2.0830230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clementson M, Jørgsholm P, Besjakov J et al (2015) Conservative treatment versus arthroscopic-assisted screw fixation of scaphoid waist fractures: a randomized trial with minimum 4-year follow-up. J Hand Surg 40:1341–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adolfsson L, Lindau T, Arner M (2001) Acutrak screw fixation versus cast immobilisation for undisplaced scaphoid waist fractures. J Hand Surg 26(3):192–195. https://doi.org/10.1054/jhsb.2001.0558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatih Özden.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author reports no conflicts of interest and certifies that no funding has been received for this study and/or preparation of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özden, F. Comparison of Conservative Treatment and Surgery Treatment for Acute Scaphoid Fracture: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. World J Surg 47, 3449–3450 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07168-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07168-1

Navigation