Abstract
Background
This study aimed to compare patient outcomes after splenic angioembolization (SAE) or splenectomy for isolated severe blunt splenic injury (BSI) with hemodynamic instability, and to identify potential candidates for SAE.
Methods
Adult patients with isolated severe BSI (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] 3–5) and hemodynamic instability between 2013 and 2019 were identified from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement (ACS TQIP) database. Hemodynamic instability was defined as an initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg, heart rate (HR) >120 bpm, or lowest SBP <90 mmHg within 1 h after admission, with ≥1 unit of blood transfused within 4 h after admission. In-hospital mortality was compared between splenectomy and SAE groups using 2:1 propensity-score matching. The characteristics of unmatched and matched splenectomy patients were also compared.
Results
A total of 478 patients met our inclusion criteria (332 splenectomy, 146 SAE). After propensity-score matching, 166 splenectomy and 83 SAE patients were compared. Approximately 85% of propensity-score matched patients sustained AIS 3/4 injuries, and 50% presented with normal SBP and HR before becoming hemodynamically unstable. The median time to intervention (splenectomy or SAE) was 137 min (interquartile range 94–183). In-hospital mortality between splenectomy and SAE groups was not significantly different (5.4% vs. 4.8%, p = 1.000). More than half of unmatched patients in the splenectomy group sustained AIS 5 injuries and presented with initially unstable hemodynamics. The median time to splenectomy in such patients was significantly shorter than in matched splenectomy patients (67 vs. 132 min, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Splenectomy remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with AIS 5 BSI who present to hospital with hemodynamic instability. However, SAE might be a feasible alternative for patients with AIS 3/4 injuries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Peitzman AB, Heil B, Rivera L et al (2000) Blunt splenic injury in adults: multi-institutional study of the eastern association for the surgery of trauma. J Trauma 49(2):177–187
Rowell SE, Biffl WL, Brasel K et al (2017) Western trauma association critical decisions in trauma: management of adult blunt splenic trauma-2016 updates. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 82(4):787–793
Stassen NA, Bhullar I, Cheng JD, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma et al (2012) Selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: an eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73(5 Suppl 4):S294-300
Coccolini F, Montori G, Catena F et al (2017) Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients. World J Emerg Surg 12:40
Sclafani SJ, Shaftan GW, Scalea TM et al (1995) Nonoperative salvage of computed tomography-diagnosed splenic injuries: utilization of angiography for triage and embolization for hemostasis. J Trauma 39:818–825
Gaarder C, Dormagen JB, Eken T et al (2006) Nonoperative management of splenic injuries: improved results with angioembolization. J Trauma 61(1):192–198
Sabe AA, Claridge JA, Rosenblum DI et al (2009) The effects of splenic artery embolization on nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: a 16-year experience. J Trauma 67(3):565–572 (Discussion 571–2)
Harbrecht BG, Ko SH, Watson GA et al (2007) Angiography for blunt splenic trauma does not improve the success rate of nonoperative management. J Trauma 63(1):44–49
Zarzaur BL, Kozar R, Myers JG et al (2015) The splenic injury outcomes trial: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79(3):335–342
Arvieux C, Frandon J, Tidadini F, Splenic Arterial Embolization to Avoid Splenectomy (SPLASH) Study Group et al (2020) Effect of prophylactic embolization on patients with blunt trauma at high risk of splenectomy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 155(12):1102–1111
Aoki M, Onogawa A, Matsumoto S et al (2023) Recent trends in the management of isolated high-grade splenic injuries: a nationwide analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 94(2):220–225
Dolejs SC, Savage SA, Hartwell JL et al (2018) Overall splenectomy rates stable despite increasing usage of angiography in the management of high-grade blunt splenic injury. Ann Surg 268(1):179–185
Austin PC (2009) Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 28(25):3083–3107
Zhang Z, Kim HJ, Lonjon G, et al., written on behalf of AME Big-Data Clinical Trial Collaborative Group (2019) Balance diagnostics after propensity score matching. Ann Transl Med 7(1):16
Aoki M, Abe T, Hagiwara S et al (2021) Embolization versus surgery for stabilized patients with solid organ injury. J Vasc Interv Radiol 32(8):1150-1155.e5
Tan T, Luo Y, Hu J et al (2022) Nonoperative management with angioembolization for blunt abdominal solid organ trauma in hemodynamically unstable patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02054-2
American College of Surgeons. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient 2022 standards (2022). American College of Surgeons , Chicago, IL
Lee JT, Slade E, Uyeda J et al (2021) American society of emergency radiology multicenter blunt splenic trauma study: CT and clinical findings. Radiology 299(1):122–130
Liao CA, Kuo LW, Wu YT et al (2020) Unstable hemodynamics is not always predictive of failed nonoperative management in blunt splenic injury. World J Surg 44(9):2985–2992
Tinkoff G, Esposito TJ, Reed J, Kilgo P, Fildes J, Pasquale M, Meredith JW (2008) American Association for the surgery of trauma organ injury scale i: spleen, liver, and kidney, validation based on the National Trauma Data Bank. J Am Coll Surg 207(5):646–655
Funding
No funding for research or publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital. Because of the anonymous and retrospective nature of the study, the need for informed consent was waived.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Aoki, M., Matsumoto, S., Abe, T. et al. Angioembolization for Isolated Severe Blunt Splenic Injuries with Hemodynamic Instability: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. World J Surg 47, 2644–2650 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07156-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07156-5