Abstract
Background
The adoption of robotic surgery for esophageal cancer has been expanding rapidly over the recent years. In the setting of two-field esophagectomy, different techniques exist for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis, although the superiority of one over another has not been clearly demonstrated. Potential benefits in terms of anastomotic leakage and stenosis have been reported in association with a linear-stapled anastomosis as compared to the more widespread techniques of circular mechanical and hand-sewn reconstructions, however, there is still limited reported evidence on its application to robotic surgery. We here report our fully robotic technique of side-to-side, semi-mechanical anastomosis.
Methods
All consecutive patients undergoing fully robotic esophagectomy featuring intrathoracic side-to-side stapled anastomosis by a single surgical team were included in this analysis. Operative technique is detailed, and perioperative data are assessed.
Results
A total of 49 patients were included. There were no intraoperative complications and no conversion occurred. The rate of overall postoperative morbidity was 25, 14% being the relative rate of major complications. With anastomotic-related morbidity in particular, one patient developed minor anastomotic leakage.
Conclusions
Our experience demonstrates that a linear, side-to-side fully robotic stapled anastomosis can be created with a high technical success and minimal incidence of anastomosis-related morbidity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Byiringiro I, Aurit SJ, Nandipati KC (2022) Long-term survival outcomes associated with robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09588-x
Pointer DT Jr, Saeed S, Naffouje SA, Mehta R, Hoffe SE, Dineen SP, Fleming JB, Fontaine JP, Pimiento JM (2022) Outcomes of 350 robotic-assisted esophagectomies at a high-volume cancer center: a contemporary propensity-score matched analysis. Ann Surg 276(1):111–118
Guerra F, Vegni A, Gia E, Amore Bonapasta S, Di Marino M, Annecchiarico M, Coratti A (2018) Early experience with totally robotic esophagectomy for malignancy. Surgical and oncological outcomes. Int J Med Robot 14(3):e1902. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1902. Epub 2018 Mar 6. PMID: 29508541
Kingma BF, Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, van Det MJ, Kouwenhoven EA, Chao YK, Tsai CY, Fuchs HF, Bruns CJ, Sarkaria IS, Luketich JD, Haveman JW, Etten BV, Chiu PW, Chan SM, Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Hölzen JP, Sallum RA, Cecconello I, Egberts JH, Benedix F, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Perez D, Jansen K, Hubka M, Low DE, Biebl M, Pratschke J, Turner P, Pursnani K, Chaudry A, Smith M, Mazza E, Strignano P, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, UGIRA Study Group (2022) Worldwide techniques and outcomes in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from the multicenter international registry. Ann Surg 276(5):e386–e392
Babic B, Müller DT, Jung JO, Schiffmann LM, Grisar P, Schmidt T, Chon SH, Schröder W, Bruns CJ, Fuchs HF (2022) Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center. Surg Endosc 36(10):7747–7755
Angeramo CA, Bras Harriott C, Casas MA, Schlottmann F (2021) Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Syst Rev Meta Anal Surg 170(6):1692–1701
Plat VD, Stam WT, Schoonmade LJ, Heineman DJ, van der Peet DL, Daams F (2020) Implementation of robot-assisted Ivor Lewis procedure: Robotic hand-sewn, linear or circular technique? Am J Surg 220(1):62–68
de Groot EM, Möller T, Kingma BF, Grimminger PP, Becker T, van Hillegersberg R, Egberts JH, Ruurda JP (2020) Technical details of the hand-sewn and circular-stapled anastomosis in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 33(Supplement_2):doaa055
Carr RA, Molena D (2021) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: anastomotic techniques. Ann Esophagus 4:1
Schröder W, Raptis DA, Schmidt HM, Gisbertz SS, Moons J, Asti E, Luyer MDP, Hölscher AH, Schneider PM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Nafteux P, Nilsson M, Räsanen J, Palazzo F, Mercer S, Bonavina L, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Wijjnhoven BPL, Pattyn P, Grimminger PP, Bruns CJ, Gutschow CA (2019) Anastomotic techniques and associated morbidity in total minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy: results from the esobenchmark database. Ann Surg 270(5):820–826. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003538. (PMID: 31634181)
Kamarajah SK, Bundred JR, Singh P, Pasquali S, Griffiths EA (2020) Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJS Open. (4):563–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50298. Epub 2020 May 23. PMID: 32445431; PMCID: PMC7397345
Zhang H, Wang Z, Zheng Y, Geng Y, Wang F, Chen LQ, Wang Y (2019) Robotic side-to-side and end-to-side stapled esophagogastric anastomosis of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer. World J Surg 43(12):3074–3082
Finze A, Betzler J, Hetjens S, Reissfelder C, Otto M, Blank S (2022) Circular vs. linear stapling after minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy: a pooled analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407(5):1831–1838
Funding
No grant or other sources of funding have been received for the drawing up of this manuscript, which is not submitted or under consideration elsewhere.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FG done investigating, writing, video editing, review, and supervision. AT, GG, and MM did investigating, review, supervision. AC performed conceptualization, review, and supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was not required for this type of report. All patients signed a procedure-specific informed consent.
Disclosures
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 159980 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Guerra, F., Tribuzi, A., Giuliani, G. et al. Fully Robotic Side-to-Side Linear-Stapled Anastomosis During Robotic Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy. World J Surg 47, 2207–2212 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07050-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07050-0