Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Holmium laser Lithotripsy and Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration for Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Scientific Review
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (LHLL) has been used to treat bile duct stones with unclear outcomes. A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the LHLL and laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) efficacy and safety in treating bile duct stones.

Methods

The correlational studies were searched databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP, to identify eligible studies from inception to July 2022. The dichotomous and continuous outcomes were evaluated using odds ratio (OR), risk difference (RD) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Stata 15.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software helped in data analyses.

Results

A total of 23 studies with 1,890 patients, primarily from China, were included. The results indicated that operation time (WMD = − 26.94; 95% CI:(− 34.30, − 19.58); P < 0.00001), estimated blood loss (WMD = − 17.97; 95% CI: (− 22.94, − 13.00); P = 0.002), rate of residual stone (OR = 0.15, 95%CI: (0.10, 0.23); P < 0.00001), length of hospital stay (WMD = − 2.88; 95% CI:(− 3.80, − 1.96); P < 0.00001) and time to bowel function recovery (WMD = − 0.59; 95% CI: (− 0.76, − 0.41); P < 0.00001) had statistically significant differences between the two groups. In postoperative complications, biliary leakage (RD = -0.03; 95% CI: (− 0.05, -0.00); P = 0.02), infection (RD = − 0.06; 95% CI: (− 0.09,− 0.03); P < 0.00001) and Hepatic injury (RD = − 0.06; 95% CI: (− 0.11, − 0.01); P = 0.02) revealed statistically significant differences. However, no significant differences were observed in biliary damage (RD = − 0.03; 95% CI: (− 0.06, 0.00); P = 0.06) and hemobilia (RD = − 0.03; 95% CI: (− 0.06, 0.00); P = 0.08).

Conclusion

The current meta-analysis indicated that LHLL could be more effective and safer than LBDC. However, these results should be confirmed with a larger sample size and rigorously designed randomized controlled trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are included in this manuscript.

References

  1. Lammert F, Gurusamy K, Ko CW et al (2016) Gallstones. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2:16024. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Navaratne L, Martinez Isla A (2021) Transductal versus transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: an institutional review of over four hundred cases. Surg Endosc 35:437–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07522-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Portincasa P, Di Ciaula A, de Bari O et al (2016) Management of gallstones and its related complications. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:93–112. https://doi.org/10.1586/17474124.2016.1109445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stinton LM, Shaffer EA (2012) Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver 6:172–187. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2012.6.2.172

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Portincasa P, Moschetta A, Palasciano G (2006) Cholesterol gallstone disease. Lancet 368:230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69044-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bass RB, Teitelbaum EN (2022) Novel advances in surgery for gallstone disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 24:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-022-00844-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan D, Zhang Y (2022) Differences in outcome and comparison of stress and immune status in patients with recurrent common bile duct stones after biliary tract surgery choosing three procedures (ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE) for treatment. Comput Math Methods Med 2022:9197990. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9197990

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lokeshwar SD, Harper BT, Webb E et al (2019) Epidemiology and treatment modalities for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Transl Androl Urol 8:529–539. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.10.01

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Aldoukhi AH, Roberts WW, Hall TL et al (2017) Holmium laser lithotripsy in the new stone age: dust or bust? Front Surg 4:57. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2017.00057

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kronenberg P, Somani B (2018) Advances in lasers for the treatment of stones-a systematic review. Curr Urol Rep 19:45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0807-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Shamamian P, Grasso M (2004) Management of complex biliary tract calculi with a holmium laser. J Gastrointest Surg 8:191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2003.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Varban O, Assimos D, Passman C et al (2010) Video. laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and holmium laser lithotripsy: a novel approach to the management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:1759–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0837-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin P, Jing W, Zhan W et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of complicated biliary calculus: a PRISMA-compliant systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Med (Baltimore) 98:14286. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000014286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the newcastle-ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gu H (2010) Clinical study of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in the treatment of impacted stones in the lower segment of the common bile duct with holmium laser lithotripsy. Med Inova China 7:33–34. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2010.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Feng JC (2015) Clinical study of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in the treatment of refractory bile duct stones with holmium laser. Med Healthc 198–199

  18. Zhu SC, Wang ZB, Yao XY et al (2015) The study of holmium laser combined with choledochoscopy in laparoscopic choledocho-lithotomy. Mod Med Health Res 15(15):28–30. https://doi.org/10.13638/j.issn.1671-4040.2015.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li LF (2022) Clinical efficacy and safety of double mirror combined with holmium laser in the treatment of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones. Prim Med Forum 109–109

  20. Zheng ZM, Yuan YC, Luo YQ et al (2016) Laparoscopy holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones. Chin J Prim Med Phram 23:2182–2185

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xu JT, Zhou JC, Peng JC et al (2017) Laparoscopy, choledochoscopy combined with holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of extrahepatic bile duct stones through the cystic duct approach. Health Res 37:439–440

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang C, Lv S, Wang A et al (2019) A clinical study of choledochoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for multiple intrahepatic calculi within ERAS programs. Lasers Surg Med 51:161–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ding ZL, Xu GY, Jiang HY et al (2018) The application in the treatment of extra·-and intrahepatic cholangiolithiasis by laparoscopy with choledochoscope combined with holmium laser lithotripsy. J Xuzhou Med Univ 38:459–461. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2065.2018.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun DH (2018) Clinical observation of laparoscopic choledochoscopy combined with holmium laser in the treatment of common bile duct stones. Prim Med Forum 22:2246–2247. https://doi.org/10.19435/j.1672-1721.2018.16.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tong LL, Zhang JJ (2018) Comparison of effect of holmium laser lithotrity and cholangiotomy for stone removal under laparoscopy and choledochoscope on older cholangiolithiasis patients. J Med Forum 39

  26. Xiao DA (2019) Feasibility of choledochoscopy in laparoscopic surgery combined with holmium laser lithotripsy in treatment of intrahepatic bile duct stone. China Med Pharm 9:226–228

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sheng SJ (2019) Clinical efficacy analysis of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of extrahepatic bile duct stones. Mod Diagn Treat

  28. Zhang KJ (2020) Clinical value of laparoscopy-choledochoscopy combined with holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of refractory bile duct stones. Health Manag 114

  29. Wang QL, Feng W, Lin B (2020) Clinical effect of laparoscopic choledochoscopy combined with holmium laser in the treatment of refractory bile duct stones. Heilongjiang Med J 44:1367–1369

    Google Scholar 

  30. Guo YQ, Wei KY, Liao JZ et al (2020) Clinical observation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with holmium laser in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis complicated with common bile duct stones. Modern Dig Interv 25:1490–1492. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2159.2020.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pan LW, Wang WL (2020) Clinical experience of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscope holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones. J Hepatobiliary Surg 28:458–459

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yu HP, Zhou T (2021) Application of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy in bile duct stones. Modern Med Health Res

  33. Peng GJ, Zhang W, Chen BY et al (2021) Clinical study of holmium laser lithotripsy through rigid choledochoscope under laparoscope on cholelithiasis. Linchuangyushijian 19:21–23. https://doi.org/10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2021.15.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hu ZW, Liu JS, Shai Q et al (2021) Effect analysis of dual mirror combined holmium laser in the treatment of intractable intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct calculi. China Clin Pract Med 12:67–70

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lei LY, Li WQ, Zhang JJ (2021) Clinical effect of laparoscopic combined with choledochoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of extrahepatic bile duct stones. Clini Med Res Pract 6:75–77. https://doi.org/10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202108024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ma XF, Jiao YR, Wang M et al (2021) Effect of laparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy on stress response and postoperative complications in patients with intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones. J Chengde Med Univ. 38:212–215. https://doi.org/10.15921/j.cnki.cyxb.2021.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang HP (2022) To compare the effects of three different surgical methods in the treatment of refractory intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones. Prim Med Forum 26:5–7. https://doi.org/10.19435/j.1672-1721.2022.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Li LF (2022) Clinical efficacy and safety of double mirror combined with holmium laser in the treatment of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones. Prim Med Forum. 26:16–18. https://doi.org/10.19435/j.1672-1721.2022.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ozcan N, Riaz A, Kahriman G (2021) Percutaneous management of biliary stones. Semin Intervent Radiol 38:348–355. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731373

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cianci P, Restini E (2021) Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and surgical approaches. World J Gastroenterol 27:4536–4554. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i28.4536

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Troncone E, Mossa M, De Vico P et al (2022) Difficult biliary stones: a comprehensive review of new and old lithotripsy techniques. Medicina Kaunas. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Binh NT, Ly NL, Hien PN et al (2022) Percutaneous transhepatic cholecystolithotomy by holmium laser for non-high-risk patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones. Med Arch 76:29–33. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2022.76.29-33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Fujita A, Nakahara K, Michikawa Y et al (2020) Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal. BMC Gastroenterol 20:285. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01428-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. García-Cano J, Arana LT, Ayllón CJ et al (2009) Biliary sphincterotomy dilation for the extraction of difficult common bile duct stones. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 101:541–545. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1130-01082009000800004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Katanuma A, Hayashi T, Kin T et al (2020) Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: techniques and literature review. Dig Endosc 32:263–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jones T, Al Musawi J, Navaratne L et al (2019) Holmium laser lithotripsy improves the rate of successful transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Langenbecks Arch Surg 404:985–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01845-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ahmad DS, Faulx A (2020) Management of postcholecystectomy biliary complications: a narrative review. Am J Gastroenterol 115:1191–1198. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ma Z, Zhou J, Yao L et al (2022) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review. Surg Endosc 36:718–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08340-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hazey JW, McCreary M, Guy G et al (2007) Efficacy of percutaneous treatment of biliary tract calculi using the holmium:YAG laser. Journal 21:1180–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9168-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, NHC Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Therapy of Gastrointestinal Tumor and the DaVinci Surgery System Database (DSSD, www.davincisurgerydatabase.com) and for their help and support in the methodology and meta-analysis process.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from The 2021 Central- Guided Local Science and Technology Development Fund (ZYYDDFFZZJ-1), Key talent project of Gansu Province of the Organization Department of Gansu Provincial Party Committee (2020RCXM076), Gansu Provincial Youth Science and Technology Fund Program (22JR5RA706), Gansu Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis and Precision Treatment of Surgical Tumors (18JR2RA033), Gansu Provincial Hospital project (NHCDP2022017) Gansu Province Excellent Doctor Fund Project (22JR5RA649).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LB, FLY, and CH designed the research; LB, LTT, and YM conducted the literature search; LB and ZGM collected and retrieved the data; LB, DXH, and ZQQ analyzed the data; LB wrote and revised the manuscript; All authors approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Cai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors proclaim that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1264 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, B., Fu, L., Lu, T. et al. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Holmium laser Lithotripsy and Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration for Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World J Surg 47, 1809–1820 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-06995-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-06995-6

Navigation