Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High-Risk Breast Lesions Diagnosed by Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Excision

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to analyze the role of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision (US-guided VAE) in the treatment of high-risk breast lesions and to evaluate the clinical and US features of the patients associated with recurrence or development of malignancy.

Materials and methods

Between April 2010 and September 2021, 73 lesions of 73 patients underwent US-guided VAE and were diagnosed with high-risk breast lesions. The incidence of recurrence or development of malignancy for high-risk breast lesions was evaluated at follow-up period. The clinical and US features of the patients were analyzed to identify the factors affecting the recurrence or development of malignancy rate.

Results

Only benign phyllodes tumors on US-guided VAE showed recurrences, while other high-risk breast lesions that were atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), lobular neoplasia (atypical lobular hyperplasia/lobular carcinoma in situ), radial scar, and flat epithelial atypia did not show recurrences or malignant transformation. The recurrence rate of the benign phyllodes tumor was 20.8% (5/24) in a mean follow-up period of 34.3 months. The recurrence rate of benign phyllodes tumor with distance from nipple of less than 1 cm was significantly higher than that of lesions with distance from nipple of more than 1 cm (75% vs. 10%, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Benign phyllodes tumors without concurrent breast cancer could be safely followed up instead of surgical excision after US-guided VAE when the lesions were classified as BI-RADS 3 or 4A by US.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lewin AA, Mercado CL (2020) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and lobular neoplasia: update and easing of guidelines. AJR Am J Roentgenol 214:265–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morrow M, Schnitt SJ, Norton L (2015) Current management of lesions associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12:227–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heller SL, Moy L (2012) Imaging features and management of high-risk lesions on contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:249–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas PS (2018) Diagnosis and management of high-risk breast lesions. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16:1391–1396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Degnim AC, King TA (2013) Surgical management of high-risk breast lesions. Surg Clin North Am 93:329–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cha E, Ambinder EB, Oluyemi ET et al (2022) High-risk lesions in the breast diagnosed by MRI-guided core biopsy: upgrade rates and features associated with malignancy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 196:517–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett I, de Viana D, Law M et al (2020) Surgeon-performed vacuum-assisted biopsy of the breast: results from a multicentre Australian study. World J Surg 44:819–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05266-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett IC, Saboo A (2019) The evolving role of vacuum assisted biopsy of the breast: a progression from fine-needle aspiration biopsy. World J Surg 43:1054–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-04892-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mooney KL, Bassett LW, Apple SK (2016) Upgrade rates of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: a single-institution experience and literature review. Mod Pathol 29:471–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Graham CL (2017) Evaluation of percutaneous vacuum assisted intact specimen breast biopsy device for ultrasound visualized breast lesions: upstage rates and long term follow-up for high risk lesions and DCIS. Breast 33:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gumus H, Mills P, Gumus M et al (2013) Factors that impact the upgrading of atypical ductal hyperplasia. Diagn Interv Radiol 19:91–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Winchester DJ, Bernstein JR, Jeske JM et al (2003) Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy. Arch Surg 138:619–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schiaffino S, Massone E, Gristina L et al (2018) Vacuum assisted breast biopsy (VAB) excision of subcentimeter microcalcifications as an alternative to open biopsy for atypical ductal hyperplasia. Br J Radiol 91:20180003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferre R, Omeroglu A, Mesurolle B (2017) Sonographic appearance of lesions diagnosed as lobular neoplasia at sonographically guided biopsies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:669–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adrales G, Turk P, Wallace T et al (2000) Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by Mammotome? Am J Surg 180:313–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khoury T, Chen X, Wang D et al (2015) Nomogram to predict the likelihood of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on a core needle biopsy in mammographically detected lesions. Histopathology 67:106–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McCroskey Z, Sneige N, Herman CR et al (2018) Flat epithelial atypia in directional vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast microcalcifications: surgical excision may not be necessary. Mod Pathol 31:1097–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Latronico A, Nicosia L, Faggian A et al (2018) A typical ductal hyperplasia: our experience in the management and long term clinical follow-up in 71 patients. Breast 37:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shang QJ, Li N, Zhang MK et al (2020) Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excisional biopsy to treat benign phyllodes tumors. Breast 49:242–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park HL, Pyo YC, Kim KY et al (2018) Recurrence rates and characteristics of phyllodes tumors diagnosed by ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB). Anticancer Res 38:5481–5487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhatt AA, Whaley DH, Lee CU (2021) Ultrasound-guided breast biopsies: basic and new techniques. J Ultrasound Med 40:1427–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Gang Cui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, P., Lei, YT., Zhao, HM. et al. High-Risk Breast Lesions Diagnosed by Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Excision. World J Surg 47, 1247–1252 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-06930-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-06930-9

Navigation