Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Low Cost Gastroschisis Silo for Sub-Saharan Africa: Testing in a Porcine Model

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gastroschisis mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) remains high at 59–100%. Silo inaccessibility contributes to this disparity. Standard of care (SOC) silos cost $240, while median monthly incomes in SSA are < $200. Our multidisciplinary American and Ugandan team designed and bench-tested a low-cost (LC) silo that costs < $2 and is constructed from locally available materials. Here we describe in vivo LC silo testing.

Methods

A piglet gastroschisis model was achieved by eviscerating intestines through a midline incision. Eight piglets were randomized to LC or SOC silos. Bowel was placed into the LC or SOC silo, maintained for 1-h, and reduced. Procedure times for placement, intestinal reduction, and silo removal were recorded. Tissue injury of the abdominal wall and intestine was assessed. Bacterial and fungal growth on silos was also compared.

Results

There were no gross injuries to abdominal wall or intestine in either group or difference in minor bleeding. Times for silo application, bowel reduction, and silo removal between groups were not statistically or clinically different, indicating similar ease of use. Microbiologic analysis revealed growth on all samples, but density was below the standard peritoneal inoculum of 105 CFU/g for both silos. There was no significant difference in bacterial or fungal growth between LC and SOC silos.

Conclusion

LC silos designed for manufacturing and clinical use in SSA demonstrated similar ease of use, absence of tissue injury, and acceptable microbiology profile, similar to SOC silos. The findings will allow our team to proceed with a pilot study in Uganda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LC:

Low cost

SOC:

Standard of care

LMICs:

Low- and middle-income countries

SSA:

Sub-Saharan Africa

References

  1. Ullrich SJ, Kakembo N, Grabski DF et al (2020) Burden and outcomes of neonatal surgery in Uganda: results of a five-year prospective study. J Surg Res 246:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gamba P, Midrio P (2014) Abdominal wall defects: prenatal diagnosis, newborn management, and long-term outcomes. Semin Pediatr Surg 23(5):283–290. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2014.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ford K, Poenaru D, Moulot O et al (2016) Gastroschisis: Bellwether for neonatal surgery capacity in low resource settings? J Pediatr Surg 51(8):1262–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wesonga AS, Fitzgerald TN, Kabuye R et al (2016) Gastroschisis in Uganda: opportunities for improved survival. J Pediatr Surg 51(11):1772–1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wesonga A, Situma M, Lakhoo K (2020) Reducing gastroschisis mortality: a quality improvement initiative at a Ugandan pediatric surgery unit. World J Surg 44(5):1395–1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05373-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Arivoli M, Biswas A, Burroughs N et al (2020) Multidisciplinary development of a low-cost gastroschisis silo for use in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Surg Res 255:565–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Swift RISM, Ziderman DA, Silverman M, Elder MA, Elder MG (1992) A new regime in the management of gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 27(1):61–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Novotny DA, Klein RL, Boeckman CR (1993) Gastroschisis: an 18-year review. J Pediatr Surg 28(5):650–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(93)90022-d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Poola AS, Aguayo P, Fraser JD et al (2019) Primary closure versus bedside silo and delayed closure for gastroschisis: a truncated prospective randomized trial. Eur J Pediatr Surg 29(2):203–208. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1627459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hawkins RB, Raymond SL, St Peter SD et al (2020) Immediate versus silo closure for gastroschisis: results of a large multicenter study. J Pediatr Surg 55(7):1280–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Organization WH. Kenya Statistics (2019).

  12. Organization WH. United Republic of Tanzania Statistics.

  13. Organization WH. Malawi Statistics (2019)

  14. Organization WH (2019). Uganda Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000004363

  15. Gajewski J, Pittalis C, Lavy C et al (2020) Anesthesia capacity of district-level hospitals in Malawi, Tanzania, and Zambia: a mixed-methods study. Anesth Analg 130(4):845–853. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bustorff-Silva JM, Schmidt AF, Goncalves A, Marba S, Sbragia L (2008) The female condom as a temporary silo: a simple and inexpensive tool in the initial management of the newborn with gastroschisis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 21(9):648–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050802178003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kusafuka J, Yamataka A, Okazaki T et al (2005) Gastroschisis reduction using “Applied Alexis”, a wound protector and retractor. Pediatr Surg Int 21(11):925–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-005-1518-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Konig C, Simmen HP, Blaser J (1998) Bacterial concentrations in pus and infected peritoneal fluid–implications for bactericidal activity of antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 42(2):227–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/42.2.227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nichols CRDJ, Pemberton PJ (1997) Rising incidence of gastroschisis in teenage pregnancies. J Maternal Fetal Med 6(4):225–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6661(199707/08)6:4%3C225::aid-mfm8%3E3.0.co;2-l

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Davies MW, Kimble RM, Woodgate PG (2002) Ward reduction without general anaesthesia versus reduction and repair under general anaesthesia for gastroschisis in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003671. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003671

  21. Elhosny A, Banieghbal B (2021) Simplified preformed silo bag crafted from standard equipment in African Hospitals. Afr J Paediatr Surg 18(2):123–126. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_62_20

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Dr. Leraas’ work is supported by a T32 training grant in Surgical Oncology. BME-IDEA International Students Grants Program, VentureWell Grants; “Saving Intestines at Birth: Gastroschisis Silos for Sub-Saharan Africa (#20538-20).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harold J. Leraas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leraas, H.J., Biswas, A., Eze, A. et al. Low Cost Gastroschisis Silo for Sub-Saharan Africa: Testing in a Porcine Model. World J Surg 47, 545–551 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06797-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06797-2

Navigation