References
Salvador M-C, Berrevoet F, Jorgensen LN et al (2022) Establishing a peer consensus about the use of long term biosynthetic absorbable mesh for hernia (grade 2–3) as standard of care. World J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06743-2
Ramana B, Sinha R, Jacob B, Towfigh S, Rosin D (2020) Acronyms use in abdominal wall reconstruction: introduction to a new language. World J Surg. 44(1):78–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05221-6 (PMID: 31602519)
Roth JS, Anthone GJ, Selzer DJ et al (2020) Prospective, multicenter study of P4HB (Phasix™) mesh for hernia repair in cohort at risk for complications: 3-Year follow-up. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 15(61):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.002 (PMID: 33363718; PMCID: PMC7750179)
Charleux-Muller D, Hurel R, Fabacher T et al (2021) Slowly absorbable mesh in contaminated incisional hernia repair: results of a French multicenter study. Hernia 25(4):1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02366-5 (Epub 2021 Jan 25 PMID: 33492554)
Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Petro CC et al (2022) Biologic vs synthetic mesh for single-stage repair of contaminated ventral hernias: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 157(4):293–301. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6902.PMID:35044431;PMCID:PMC877143
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramana, B., Kalikar, V.R. LTBAs in Hernia Surgery: Learning from History. World J Surg 46, 3005–3006 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06792-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06792-7