Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Effective is the Use of Molecular Testing in Preoperative Decision Making for Management of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules?

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

We performed Thyroseq v2 molecular testing on indeterminate thyroid nodules and evaluated whether they underwent a management change from the standard of thyroid lobectomy.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all indeterminate thyroid nodules that underwent Thyroseq v2 molecular testing from 2014 to 2019 at a large academic center. Pathology was reviewed by thyroid cytopathologists. Thyroseq results were reported benign (malignancy probability less than 10%) or suspicious (malignancy probability greater than 30%). The primary endpoint was a management change from a diagnostic lobectomy.

Results

A total of 142 nodules were included: 113 (80%) Bethesda III and 29 (20%) Bethesda IV. Seventy-three nodules underwent surgical management and 69 did not. We noted a change in management in 64% (91/142) of nodules. Patients who underwent a change in management to no surgery had a significantly higher rate of benign Thyroseq result than those without a change (75.8% vs. 49.0%, p = 0.001). On logistic regression analysis, a benign Thyroseq result was a positive independent predictor of a change to no surgery (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.69–8.89). Nodule size, multiple nodules, compressive symptoms, and history of hypothyroidism were not significant. Of the 91 patients who underwent a management change, 71% (65/91) did not undergo surgery. On follow-up (average 985 ± 615 days), 12% (8/65) of those nodules were growing or developed suspicious features requiring surgery.

Conclusions

Molecular testing helped avoid surgery in almost half our population with indeterminate thyroid nodules, and benign results may help avoid surgery in asymptomatic patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL et al (2021) Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 71(1):7–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cibas ES, Ali SZ (2009) The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid 19(11):1159–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bongiovanni M et al (2012) The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Cytol 56(4):333–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haugen BR et al (2016) 2015 American thyroid association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American thyroid association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 26(1):1–133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nikiforova MN et al (2013) Targeted next-generation sequencing panel (ThyroSeq) for detection of mutations in thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98(11):E1852–E1860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho AS et al (2014) Malignancy rate in thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda category III (AUS/FLUS). Thyroid 24(5):832–839

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Yaprak Bayrak B, Eruyar AT (2020) Malignancy rates for Bethesda III and IV thyroid nodules: a retrospective study of the correlation between fine-needle aspiration cytology and histopathology. BMC Endocr Disord 20(1):48

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Aragon Han P et al (2014) The impact of molecular testing on the surgical management of patients with thyroid nodules. Ann Surg Oncol 21(6):1862–1869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noureldine SI et al (2015) Effect of gene expression classifier molecular testing on the surgical decision-making process for patients with thyroid nodules. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(12):1082–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Noureldine SI et al (2016) Evaluation of the effect of diagnostic molecular testing on the surgical decision-making process for patients with thyroid nodules. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142(7):676–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jug R et al (2019) Negative results on thyroid molecular testing decrease rates of surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules. Endocr Pathol 30(2):134–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Samulski TD et al (2016) Usage trends and performance characteristics of a “gene expression classifier” in the management of thyroid nodules: an institutional experience. Diagn Cytopathol 44(11):867–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marcadis AR et al (2019) Interinstitutional variation in predictive value of the ThyroSeq v2 genomic classifier for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Surgery 165(1):17–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Taye A et al (2018) Clinical performance of a next-generation sequencing assay (ThyroSeq v2) in the evaluation of indeterminate thyroid nodules. Surgery 163(1):97–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nikiforov YE et al (2014) Highly accurate diagnosis of cancer in thyroid nodules with follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm cytology by ThyroSeq v2 next-generation sequencing assay. Cancer 120(23):3627–3634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shrestha RT et al (2016) Correlation between histological diagnosis and mutational panel testing of thyroid nodules: a 2-year institutional experience. Thyroid 26(8):1068–1076

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel SG et al (2017) Preoperative detection of RAS mutation may guide extent of thyroidectomy. Surgery 161(1):168–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Su X et al (2016) Diagnostic value of BRAF (V600E)-mutation analysis in fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther 9:2495–2509

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Steinmetz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No authors have any conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Study was approved by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steinmetz, D., Kim, M., Choi, JH. et al. How Effective is the Use of Molecular Testing in Preoperative Decision Making for Management of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules?. World J Surg 46, 3043–3050 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06744-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06744-1

Navigation