Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Risk Factors for Out-of-Pocket Expenditure at a South African Public Sector Hospital

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Worldwide, 3.7 billion people risk financial catastrophe if they require surgery, mostly affecting the poorest populations. Surgical care associated with catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) has not been well-described in the South African context. The objectives of this study were to determine: (1) the proportion of surgical patients at a South African hospital who experienced CHE and impoverishing health expenditure (IHE); and (2) the risk factors for out-of-pocket (OOP) payments.

Methods

A cross-sectional prospective questionnaire was administered to participants admitted for a surgical procedure at New Somerset Hospital, Cape Town. CHE was defined in three ways: (1) 40% or more of capacity-to-pay, (2) 25% of annual household expenditure, or (3) 10% of annual household expenditure. IHE was described as the number of participants who experienced new or worsening impoverishment after surgery.

Results

Two hundred and seventy-four participants were interviewed, and 263 were included in the analysis (4% attrition rate). Two (0.8%) participants experienced CHE. 98.5% of participants spent less than 10% of their annual household expenditure and 43 participants (16.7%) experienced IHE. Risk factors for OOP expenditure were cancer diagnosis (p = 0.0386), an elective procedure (p = 0.0001), and having a limited health insurance plan (p = 0.0492).

Discussion

Most participants undergoing a surgical procedure did not experience CHE. Participants were relatively protected from financial catastrophe owing to subsidized user fees and the provision of transport. However, 17% of patients experienced IHE, suggesting even small payments resulted in impoverishment. Ensuring low financial vulnerabilities around surgical care is an important consideration for national surgical planning in South Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson IH, Yamey G, Yip W et al (2015) Global surgery 2030. Lancet (London, England) 386:569–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization (2015) World health assembly resolution 68.15: Strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anaesthesia as a component of universal health coverage. World Health Assem

  3. Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A et al (2015) Disease control priorities (Volume 1): essential surgery. The World Bank, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris B, Goudge J, Ataguba JE et al (2011) Inequities in access to health care in South Africa. J Public Health Pol 32(1):S102–S123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L et al (2015) Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 386(9993):569–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakeera SK, Wamala SP, Galea S et al (2009) Community perceptions and factors influencing utilization of health services in Uganda. J Int equity Health 8(1):25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Doorslaer E, O’Donnell O, Rannan-Eliya RP et al (2006) Effect of payments for health care on poverty estimates in 11 countries in Asia: an analysis of household survey data. Lancet 368(9544):1357–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shrime MG, Verguet S, Johansson KA et al (2015) Task-sharing or public finance for the expansion of surgical access in rural Ethiopia: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Pol Plan 31(6):706–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ataguba JE-O (2012) Reassessing catastrophic health-care payments with a Nigerian case study. J Health Econ Policy Law 7(3):309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu K, Evans DB, Kawabata K et al (2003) Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis. Lancet (London, England) 362(9378):111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu K, Evans DB, Carrin G et al (2007) Protecting households from catastrophic health spending. J Health Aff 26(4):972–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dyer SJ, Sherwood K, McIntyre D et al (2013) Catastrophic payment for assisted reproduction techniques with conventional ovarian stimulation in the public health sector of South Africa: frequency and coping strategies. J Hum Reprod 28(10):2755–2764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O’donnell O, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A et al (2007) Analyzing health equity using household survey data: a guide to techniques and their implementation. The World Bank, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Koch SF, Setshegetso N (2020) Catastrophic health expenditures arising from out-of-pocket payments: evidence from South African income and expenditure surveys. PLoS ONE 15(8):e0237217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. World Bank (2018) Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.UHC.OOPC.10.TO

  16. World Bank (2017) Risk of impoverishing expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.SGR.IRSK.ZS

  17. South African National Department of Health (2019) Uniform patient fee schedule—classification of patients

  18. Yap A, Cheung M, Kakembo N et al (2018) From procedure to poverty: out-of-pocket and catastrophic expenditure for pediatric surgery in Uganda. J Surg Res 232:484–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bijlmakers L, Wientjes M, Mwapasa G et al (2019) Out-of-pocket payments and catastrophic household expenditure to access essential surgery in Malawi—a cross-sectional patient survey. Ann Med Surg 43:85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Walls HL, Vearey J, Modisenyane M et al (2016) Understanding healthcare and population mobility in southern Africa: the case of South Africa. S Afr Med J 106(1):14–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. James CD, Hanson K, McPake B et al (2006) To retain or remove user fees? Appl Health Econ Health Policy 5(3):137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gilson L, McIntyre D (2005) Removing user fees for primary care in Africa: the need for careful action. Br Med J 331(7519):762–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ridde V, Morestin F (2011) A scoping review of the literature on the abolition of user fees in health care services in Africa. Health Policy Plan 26(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Statistics South Africa (2015) Five facts about poverty in South Africa. http://www.statssa.gov.za/?s=poverty&sitem=publications. [cited 2020 22 April]

  25. South Africans are big borrowers and poor savers—expert [press release]. https://www.news24.com/fin24/Money/Home/south-africans-are-big-borrowers-and-poor-savers-expert-20180305-2 [cited 5 March 2018]

  26. Cronjé M, Roux A (2010) Savings culture for the black middle class in South Africa. USB Leaders’ Lab 4:2 https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/37325725.pdf [cited 6 March 2018]

  27. Davies JI, Gelb AW, Gore-Booth J, Martin J, Mellin-Olsen J et al (2021) Global surgery, obstetric, and anaesthesia indicator definitions and reporting: an Utstein consensus report. Plos Med 18(8):e1003749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003749

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Heads and staff of the following of the following departments at New Somerset Hospital: obstetrics, gynecology, general surgery, urology, and orthopedics.

Funding

This study was funded, in part, by a grant from the University of Cape Town. PN was supported by the National Research Foundation in South Africa. JEA is supported by the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation. MS is supported by the Iris O’Brien Foundation. KC and BA have no sources of funding support to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Naidu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Cape Town (UCT) Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 619/2018).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Participants between 12 and 16 years gave informed consent which was co-signed by their parents or guardians.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naidu, P., Ataguba, J.E., Shrime, M. et al. Surgical Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Risk Factors for Out-of-Pocket Expenditure at a South African Public Sector Hospital. World J Surg 46, 769–775 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06472-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06472-6

Navigation