Skip to main content
Log in

Large Nipple Volume as a Risk Factor of Nipple–areola Complex Necrosis Following Nipple-sparing Mastectomy

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 28 June 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Nipple–areola complex (NAC) necrosis, which is caused by local ischemia, remains one of the complications associated with nipple-sparing mastectomy. Obesity, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and immediate breast reconstruction have been identified as risk factors of NAC necrosis. The current study examined the correlation between NAC necrosis and nipple volume.

Materials and methods

A total of 83 patients who underwent NSM for primary breast cancer from January 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Nipple volume was determined using the formula: volume (mm3) = length × width × height (mm), with measurements determined using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Total and partial NAC necrosis was defined as full-thickness necrosis requiring surgical procedures and epidermal necrosis managing local wound care, respectively.

Results

NAC necrosis was observed in 30 patients (36%), with 3 and 27 patients having total and partial necrosis, respectively. Large nipple volume (56% vs. 24%, p = 0.006), as well as smoking and immediate breast reconstruction (57 vs. 28%, p = 0.017; 48% vs. 20%, p = 0.009, respectively), were significantly correlated with NAC necrosis. Multivariate analysis identified nipple volume as an independent risk factor for NAC necrosis (OR, 3.75; 95% CI, 1.23–11.44; p = 0.02). Smoking (OR, 4.68; 95% CI, 1.37–15.94; p = 0.014) and immediate breast reconstruction (OR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.05–11.23; p = 0.042) were also independently associated with NAC necrosis.

Conclusions

This study suggested that a large nipple volume could be one of the risk factors for NAC necrosis following NSM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Tosh BA, Lappert P (1991) Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:1048–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS et al (2009) Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol 27:4948–4954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D et al (1999) The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 6:609–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hinton CP, Doyle PJ, Blamey RW et al (1984) Subcutaneous mastectomy for primary operable breast cancer. Br J Surg 71:469–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fortunato L, Loreti A, Andrich R et al (2013) When mastectomy is needed: is the nipple-sparing procedure a new standard with very few contraindications? J Surg Oncol 108:207–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM et al (2011) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the memorial sloan-kettering cancer center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 18:3117–3122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M et al (2009) The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg 249:461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Seki T, Jinno H, Okabayashi K et al (2015) Comparison of oncological safety between nipple sparing mastectomy and total mastectomy using propensity score matching. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97:291–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Agha RA, Omran YA, Wellstead G et al (2018) Systematic review of therapeutic nipple-sparing versus skin-sparing mastectomy. BJS Open 3:135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Spear SL, Hannan CM, Willey SC et al (2009) Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1665–1673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Daniel JR et al (2012) Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technical aspects and aesthetic outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 68:446–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. De Vita R, Zoccali G, Buccheri EM et al (2017) Outcome evaluation after 2023 nipple-sparing mastectomies: our experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:335e–347e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Endara M, Chen D, Verma K et al (2013) Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1043–1054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Colwell AS, Tessler O, Lin AM et al (2014) Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:496–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carlson GW, Chu CK, Moyer HR et al (2014) Predictors of nipple ischemia after nipple sparing mastectomy. Breast J 20:69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahn SJ, Woo TY, Lee DW et al (2018) Nipple-areolar complex ischemia and necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:1170–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Salibian AA, Frey JD, Bekisz JM et al (2019) Ischemic complications after nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of reconstructive failure in implant-based reconstruction and implications for decision-making. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7:2280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pek WS, Tan BK, Ng YYR et al (2018) Immediate breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy in an Asian population: aesthetic outcomes and mitigating nipple-areolar complex necrosis. Arch Plast Surg 45:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cho JW, Yoon ES, You HJ et al (2015) Nipple-areola complex necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 42:601–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dent BL, Small K, Swistel A et al (2014) Nipple-areolar complex ischemia after nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction: risk factors and the success of conservative treatment. Aesthet Surg J 34:560–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Venturi ML, Mesbahi AN, Copeland-Halperin LR et al (2017) SPY Elite’s ability to predict nipple necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate tissue expander reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5:1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Komorowski AL, Zanini V, Regolo L et al (2006) Necrotic complications after nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy. Would J Surg 30:1410–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gould DJ, Hunt KK, Liu J et al (2013) Impact of surgical techniques, biomaterials, and patient variables on rate of nipple necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:330e–338e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Frey JD, Salibian AA, Karp NS et al (2018) The impact of mastectomy weight on reconstructive trends and outcomes in nipple-sparing mastectomy: progressively greater complications with larger breast size. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:795e–804e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nakajima H, Imanishi N, Aiso S (1995) Arterial anatomy of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:843–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. le Roux CM, Pan WR, Matousek SA et al (2011) Preventing venous congestion of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomical guide to preserving essential venous drainage networks. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:1073–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Radovanovic Z, Ranisavljevic M, Radovanovic D et al (2018) Nipple-sparing mastectomy with primary implant reconstruction: surgical and oncological outcome of 435 breast cancer patients. Breast Care (Basel) 13:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rahman MM, Laher I (2007) Structural and functional alteration of blood vessels caused by cigarette smoking: an overview of molecular mechanisms. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 5:276–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Khavanin N, Jordan S, Lovecchio F et al (2013) Synergistic interactions with a high intraoperative expander fill volume increase the risk for mastectomy flap necrosis. J Breast Cancer 16:426–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Robertson SA, Jeevaratnam JA, Agrawal A et al (2017) Mastectomy skin flap necrosis: challenges and solutions. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 9:141–152

    Google Scholar 

  31. Donker M, Hage JJ, Woerdeman LA et al (2012) Surgical complications of skin sparing mastectomy and immediate prosthetic reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:25–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. WHO. Mean BMI (kg/m2) (crude estimate). Available at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/mean-bmi-(kg-m-)-(crude-estimate)

  33. Crowe JP, Kim JA, Yetman R et al (2004) Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg 139:148–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Akiko Yuzuriha for her excellent technical assistance. This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science, Japan.

Funding

None of the authors have a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript. No funding was received for this article. Statement of IRB Approval: Teikyo University (IRB no. 20–159).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiromitsu Jinno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript. No funding was received for this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: All instances of cc were changed to mm3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamada, M., Jinno, H., Naruse, S. et al. Large Nipple Volume as a Risk Factor of Nipple–areola Complex Necrosis Following Nipple-sparing Mastectomy. World J Surg 46, 1116–1121 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06458-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06458-4

Navigation