References
Lemke M, Park L, Balaa FK et al (2021) Passive versus active intra-abdominal drainage following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective study using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database. World J Surg 45(2):554–561
Xourafas D, Ejaz A, Tsung A et al (2020) Suction or gravity: Impact of closed-system drain type on the postoperative outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy. Am Sug 86(2):e69–e72
Kone LB, Maker VK, Banulescu M et al (2021) Should drains suck? A propensity score analysis of closed-suction versus closed-gravity drainage after pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 25(5):1224–1232
Hall BR, Egr ZH, Krell RW et al (2021) Association of gravity drainage and complications following Whipple: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP targeted database. World J Surg Oncol 19(1):118
Rosner, B (2011). Fundamentals of Biostatistics (7th ed.) Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lemke, M., Martel, G. & Bertens, K.A. Authors’ Reply: Passive Versus Active Intra-Abdominal Drainage Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Retrospective Study Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database. World J Surg 45, 3473–3474 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06257-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06257-3