Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing Differences in Lymph Node Metastasis Based Upon Sex in Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Backgrounds

Whether sex has any impact on the risk of lymph node (LN) metastasis (LNM) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to objectively compared the risk of LNM between female and male patients with early-stage NSCLC so as to figure out whether sex-different extent of surgery may be justified for treating these patients.

Methods

We retrospectively collected clinical data of patients undergoing lobectomy or segmentectomy with systematic hilar and mediastinal LN dissection for clinical stage IA peripheral NSCLC from June 2014 to April 2019. Both multivariate logistic regression analysis and propensity score-matched(PSM) analysis were applied to compare the risk of LNM between female and male patients.

Results

We finally included a total of 660 patients for analysis. In the analysis of unmatched cohorts, there was no significant different rate of LNM (12.4% Vs 13.9%, P=0.556), hilar/intrapulmonary LNM (8.4% Vs 10.7%, P=0.318) and mediastinal LNM(7.9% Vs 7.5%, P=0.851) between female and male patients. In the multivariate analysis, sex was not found to be an independent predictor of LN in these patients. Moreover, in the analysis of well-matched cohorts generated by PSM analysis, there was still no significant different rate of LNM (13.8% Vs 13.4%, P=0.892), hilar/intrapulmonary LNM (9.1% Vs 11.2%, P=0.442) and mediastinal LNM (9.1% Vs 6.5%, P=0.289) between female and male patients.

Conclusions

Sex was not an independent predictor of LNM in early-stage NSCLC and there is no sufficient evidence justifying for sex-different extent of surgical resection for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F et al (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018 GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA a cancer j clin 68(6):394–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gadgeel SM et al (2012) Treatment of lung cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 50:961–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deng HY et al (2017) Radiotherapy, lobectomy or sublobar resection? A meta-analysis of the choices for treating stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur j cardio-thorac surg: off j Eur Assoc Cardio-thorac Surg 51:203–210

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aberle DR et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ettinger DS et al (2017) Non-small cell lung cancer version 5 2017 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Nat Comp Cancer Netw JNCCN 15(4):504–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Howington JA et al (2013) Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd Ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143:e278S-e313S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cerfolio RJ et al (2006) Women with pathologic stage I, II, and III non-small cell lung cancer have better survival than men. Chest 130:1796–1802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tong BC et al (2014) Sex differences in early outcomes after lung cancer resection: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelsey CR et al (2013) Metastasis dynamics for non-small-cell lung cancer: effect of patient and tumor-related factors. Clin Lung Cancer 14:425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Taioli E et al (2016) Survival after sublobar resection for early-stage lung cancer: methodological obstacles in comparing the efficacy to lobectomy. J thorac oncol: off publ Int Assoc Stud Lung Cancer 11:400–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deng HY et al (2018) Can lobe-specific lymph node dissection be an alternative to systematic lymph node dissection in treating early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis? J Thorac Dis 10:2857–2865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mostertz W et al (2010) Age- and sex-specific genomic profiles in non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA 303:535–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang L et al (2015) Nomogram to predict occult N2 Lymph nodes metastases in patients with squamous nonsmall cell lung Cancer. Med 94:e2054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayashi T et al (2013) Galectin-4, a novel predictor for lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS ONE 8:e81883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao F et al (2017) A prediction model for lymph node metastases using pathologic features in patients intraoperatively diagnosed as stage I non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 17:267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lardinois D et al (2006) ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur j card-thorac surg: off j Eur Assoc Card-thorac Surg 30:787–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Casal RF et al (2017) What exactly is a centrally located lung tumor? results of an online survey. Ann Am Thorac Soc 14:118–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldstraw P et al (2016) The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J thorac oncol: offic publ Inter Assoc Stud Lung Cancer 11:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Travis WD et al (2015) The 2015 world health organization classification of lung tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J thorac oncol: offic publ Int Assoc Stud Lung Cancer 10:1243–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deng HY et al (2017) Oesophageal adenocarcinoma has a higher risk of lymph node metastasis than squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study. Eur j card-thorac surg: off j Eur Assoc Cardio-thorac Surg 52:958–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang L et al (2015) Lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA peripheral lung cancer. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 90:41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ding N et al (2018) Predictors of lymph node metastasis and possible selective lymph node dissection in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 10:4061–4068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gomez-Caro A et al (2010) Incidence of occult mediastinal node involvement in cN0 non-small-cell lung cancer patients after negative uptake of positron emission tomography/computer tomography scan. Eur j card-thorac surg: off Eur Assoc Card-thorac Surg 37:1168–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hung JJ et al (2016) Factors predicting occult lymph node metastasis in completely resected lung adenocarcinoma of 3 cm or smaller. Eur j card-thorac surg: off j Eur Assoc Card-thorac Surg 50:329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Veeramachaneni NK et al (2008) Risk factors for occult nodal metastasis in clinical T1N0 lung cancer: a negative impact on survival. Eur j card-thorac surg: off j Eur Assoc Card-thorac Surg 33:466–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Park HK et al (2010) Occult nodal metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer at clinical stage IA by PET/CT. Respirol 15:1179–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Matsumura M et al (2017) Predictors for hilar/intrapulmonary lymph node metastasis in discrete type of clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer. Histopathol 65:640–645

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen B et al (2019) Lymph node metastasis in Chinese patients with clinical T1 non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter real-world observational study. Thorac cancer 10:533–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Deng HY et al (2019) Lung adenocarcinoma has a higher risk of lymph node metastasis than squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. World J Surg 43:955–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang YK et al (2017) Association of lymph node involvement with the prognosis of pathological T1 invasive non-small cell lung cancer. World j surg oncol 15:64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Honguero Martinez AF et al (2016) Ratio between maximum standardized uptake value of N1 lymph nodes and tumor predicts N2 disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in 18F-FDG PET-CT scan. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 35:159–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Deng HY et al (2020) Lobe-specific lymph node dissection for clinical early-stage (cIA) peripheral non-small cell lung cancer patients: what and how? Ann Surg Oncol 27:472–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Han-Yu Deng and Chang Liu collected data and drafted the manuscript. Han-Yu Deng and Xiao-Ming Qiu analyzed the data. Han-Yu Deng and Qinghua Zhou designed the study. Xiao-Ming Qiu, Da-Xing Zhu, and Xiao-Jun Tang, and Qinghua Zhou revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Han-Yu Deng and Chang Liu contributed equally to the study and were co-first authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinghua Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, HY., Liu, C., Qiu, XM. et al. Assessing Differences in Lymph Node Metastasis Based Upon Sex in Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. World J Surg 45, 2610–2618 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06136-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06136-x

Navigation