Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Traveling to Receive Treatment for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Is it worth the drive?

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Regionalization of sarcoma care may improve outcomes. Concerns exist regarding the burdens of travel and its effects on care. We evaluate the presence of a “distance bias”.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (stage I-III) within the NCDB. Travel distance (TD) and hospital volume (VOL) were categorized into quartiles. Alternating statistical models were used for analysis.

Results

1,035 hospitals contributed 11,979 cases. Median and maximum VOL were 5 and 45 cases/year. VOL quartiles were “low-volume” (LV) (892 hospitals, < 3 cases/yr.), “intermediate low-volume” (ILV) (89, 3–5 cases/yr.), “intermediate high-volume” (IHV) (39, 6–12 cases/yr.), and “high-volume” (HV) (15, > 12 cases/yr.). TD quartiles: “short-travel” (ST) (< 8 mi), “intermediate-short travel” (IST) (8–17), “intermediate long-travel” (ILT) (18–49), and “long-travel” (LT) (> 50). VOL but not TD is associated with improved survival [HR 0.65 (CI 0.52–0.83)] and rate of R0 resection [1.87 (CI 1.4–2.5)] but has no effect on amputation rates. Matched analyses demonstrate similar results.

Conclusions

Hospital volume but not distance traveled to treatment facility is associated with improved survival and R0 resections for extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Despite the inconveniences of travel, patients may benefit from treatment at high volume centers.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Cancer Institute (2019) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: soft tissue including heart cancer. National Cancer Institute

  2. Brennan MF, Antonescu CR, Moraco N et al (2014) Lessons learned from the study of 10,000 patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg 260:416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Trovik C, Bauer HCF, Styring E et al (2017) The scandinavian sarcoma group central register: 6,000 patients after 25 years of monitoring of referral and treatment of extremity and trunk wall soft-tissue sarcoma. Acta Orthop 88:341–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalaiselvan R, Malik AK, Rao R et al (2019) Impact of centralization of services on outcomes in a rare tumour: retroperitoneal sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 45:249–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. NICE (2006) Improving outcomes for people with sarcoma. UK, National Collaborating Centre for Cancer

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dangoor A, Seddon B, Gerrand C et al (2016) UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas. Clin Sarcoma Res 6:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kasper B, Lecointe-Artzner E, Wait S et al (2018) Working to improve the management of sarcoma patients across Europe: a policy checklist. BMC Cancer 18:424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Macedo FIB, Jayanthi P, Mowzoon M et al (2017) The impact of surgeon volume on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 21:1723–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D et al (2005) Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 242:540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bagaria SP, Chang YH, Gray RJ et al (2018) Improving long-term outcomes for patients with extra-abdominal soft tissue sarcoma regionalization to high-volume centers, improved compliance with guidelines or both? Sarcoma 2018:8141056

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. White MG, Applewhite MK, Kaplan EL et al (2017) A tale of two cancers: traveling to treat pancreatic and thyroid cancer. J Am Coll Surg 225(125–136):e126

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wasif N, Chang YH, Pockaj BA et al (2016) Association of distance traveled for surgery with short- and long-term cancer outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 23:3444–3452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamont EB, Hayreh D, Pickett KE et al (2003) Is patient travel distance associated with survival on phase ii clinical trials in oncology? JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 95:1370–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moten AS, von Mehren M, Reddy S et al (2020) Treatment patterns and distance to treatment facility for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity. J Surg Res 256:492–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lidsky ME, Sun Z, Nussbaum DP et al (2017) Going the extra mile: improved survival for pancreatic cancer patients traveling to high-volume centers. Ann Surg 266:333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beal EW, Mehta R, Hyer JM et al (2019) Association between travel distance, hospital volume, and outcomes following resection of cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 23(5):944–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xia L, Taylor BL, Mamtani R et al (2018) Associations between travel distance, hospital volume, and outcomes following radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urology 114:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cancer Co National Cancer Database—Tools, Reports, and Resources, 2018.

  20. STATA pctile—Create variable containing percentiles.

  21. Jindal M, Zheng C, Quadri HS et al (2017) Why do long-distance travelers have improved pancreatectomy outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 225:216–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G et al (2009) cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stand Genomic Sci 9:524–546

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abarca T, Gao Y, Monga V et al (2018) Improved survival for extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated in high-volume facilities. J Surg Oncol 117:1479–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stitzenberg KB, Sigurdson ER, Egleston BL et al (2009) Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care. J Clin Oncol 27:4671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alamanda VK, Delisca GO, Archer KR et al (2013) Incomplete excisions of extremity soft tissue sarcomas are unaffected by insurance status or distance from a sarcoma center. J Surg Oncol 108:477–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyu HG, Haider AH, Landman AB et al (2019) The opportunities and shortcomings of using big data and national databases for sarcoma research. Cancer 125(17):2926–2934

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto J. Vidri.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vidri, R.J., Raut, C.P. & Fitzgerald, T.L. Traveling to Receive Treatment for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Is it worth the drive?. World J Surg 45, 2415–2425 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06109-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06109-0

Navigation