Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome Predictors in Civilian and Iatrogenic Arterial Trauma

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Our aim was to identify predictors of mortality and limb loss in iatrogenic and civilian arterial trauma.

Methods

Cases were identified by searching prospectively maintained registries. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent outcome predictors.

Results

During the study period, 285 patients with arterial trauma were managed with endovascular (n = 20) or open (n = 265) repair. Iatrogenic injuries increased in frequency during the course of the study, from 23.9% during the first decade to 35.9 and 55.7% during the second and third decade, respectively (p < 0.001). Endovascular management increased in frequency during the course of the study, from 0% during the first decade to 5.1 and 11.1% during the second and third decade, respectively (p = 0.005). Mortality was 9.8%, and limb loss (in cases with injury of the aorta or limb arteries, n = 259) was 6.2%. Independent predictors of mortality included increased age (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval [OR, 95% CI] 1.05 (1.02–1.07), p < 0.001), blunt trauma (OR [95% CI] 4.8 (1.9–12.2), p = 0.001) and the number of RBC units transfused intraoperatively (OR [95% CI] 1.25 (1.1–1.4), p = 0.001). Independent predictors of limb loss included the first half of the study period (OR [95% CI] 3.9 (1.1–14.1), p = 0.04), lower extremity arterial trauma (vs upper extremity, aortic, common or external iliac artery trauma, OR [95% CI] 8.3 (1.9–35.7), p = 0.004), bone fracture (OR [95% CI] 16.9 (4.7–62.5), p < 0.001) and the number of RBC units transfused intraoperatively (OR [95% CI] 1.16 (1.02–1.33), p = 0.024).

Conclusion

Increasingly iatrogenic in cause and managed by endovascular methods, arterial trauma remains a problem associated with significant mortality and limb loss. Identification of unfavourable outcome predictors may help clinicians involved with arterial trauma to escalate the level of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tan TW, Joglar FL, Hamburg NM et al (2011) Limb outcome and mortality in lower and upper extremity arterial injury: a comparison using the national trauma data bank. Vasc Endovascular Surg 45:592–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alarhayem AQ, Cohn SM, Cantu-Nunez O et al (2019) Impact of time to repair on outcomes in patients with lower extremity arterial injuries. J Vasc Surg 69:1519–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asensio JA, Britt LD, Borzotta A et al (2001) Multiinstitutional experience with the management of superior mesenteric artery injuries. J Am Coll Surg 193:354–365 discussion 365–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Faulconer ER, Branco BC, Loja MN et al (2018) Use of open and endovascular surgical techniques to manage vascular injuries in the trauma setting: a review of the American association for the surgery of trauma prospective observational vascular injury trial registry. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 84:411–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang NL, Alarcon LH, Jeyabalan G et al (2016) Contemporary outcomes of civilian lower extremity arterial trauma. J Vasc Surg 64:731–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davidovic LB, Cinara IS, Ille T et al (2005) Civil and war peripheral arterial trauma: review of risk factors associated with limb loss. Vascular 13:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mullenix PS, Steele SR, Andersen CA et al (2006) Limb salvage and outcomes among patients with traumatic popliteal vascular injury: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Vasc Surg 44:94–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hafez HM, Woolgar J, Robbs JV (2001) Lower extremity arterial injury: results of 550 cases and review of risk factors associated with limb loss. J Vasc Surg 33:1212–1219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sciarretta JD, Macedo FI, Otero CA et al (2015) Management of traumatic popliteal vascular injuries in a level I trauma center: a 6-year experience. Int J Surg 18:136–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kauvar DS, Sarfati MR, Kraiss LW (2011) National trauma databank analysis of mortality and limb loss in isolated lower extremity vascular trauma. J Vasc Surg 53:1598–1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dauer E, Yamaguchi S, Yu D et al (2020) Major venous injury and large volume crystalloid resuscitation: a limb threatening combination. Am J Surg 219:38–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Branco BC, DuBose JJ, Zhan LX et al (2014) Trends and outcomes of endovascular therapy in the management of civilian vascular injuries. J Vasc Surg 60:1297–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rudstrom H, Bergqvist D, Ogren M et al (2008) Iatrogenic vascular injuries in Sweden. a nationwide study 1987–2005. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 35:131–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Giswold ME, Landry GJ, Taylor LM et al (2004) Iatrogenic arterial injury is an increasingly important cause of arterial trauma. Am J Surg 187:590–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anagnostou E, Larentzakis A, Vassiliu P (2018) Trauma system in Greece: Quo Vadis? Injury 49:1243–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Galyfos G, Kerasidis S, Stefanidis G et al (2016) Iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic arterial injuries in an urban level I trauma center in Greece. Int Angiol 35:526–530

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ganapathy A, Khouqeer AF, Todd SR et al (2017) Endovascular management for peripheral arterial trauma: the new norm? Injury 48:1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kruger A, Florido C, Braunisch A et al (2013) Penetrating arterial trauma to the limbs: outcome of a modified protocol. World J Emerg Surg 8:51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ramdass MJ, Harnarayan P (2017) A decade of major vascular trauma: lessons learned from gang and civilian warfare. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99:70–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goes Junior AMO, Simoes Neto JFA, Abib SCV et al (2018) Vascular trauma in the Amazon: updating the challenge. Rev Col Bras Cir 45:e1844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Mestral C, Dueck A, Sharma SS et al (2013) Evolution of the incidence, management, and mortality of blunt thoracic aortic injury: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Surg 216:1110–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Karmy-Jones R, Ferrigno L, Teso D et al (2011) Endovascular repair compared with operative repair of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta: a nonsystematic review and a plea for trauma-specific reporting guidelines. J Trauma 71:1059–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris DG, Drucker CB, Brenner ML et al (2014) Management and outcomes of blunt common and external iliac arterial injuries. J Vasc Surg 59:180–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin PH, Koffron AJ, Guske PJ et al (2003) Penetrating injuries of the subclavian artery. Am J Surg 185:580–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sobnach S, Nicol AJ, Nathire H et al (2010) An analysis of 50 surgically managed penetrating subclavian artery injuries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39:155–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Usman R, Jamil M, Anwer MF (2018) Evaluation, surgical management and outcome of traumatic extremity vascular injuries: a 5-year level-1 trauma centres experience. Ann Vasc Dis 11:312–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kakkos SK, Tsolakis IA, Markopoulos G et al (2019) Presentation patterns and prognosis of 109 isolated venous injuries in 99 patients. Phlebology 34:698–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was approved by the institutional review board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stavros K. Kakkos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kakkos, S.K., Tyllianakis, M., Panagopoulos, A. et al. Outcome Predictors in Civilian and Iatrogenic Arterial Trauma. World J Surg 45, 160–167 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05792-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05792-9

Navigation