Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing Post-operative Pain with Self-reports via the Jerrycan Pain Scale in Rural Kenya

  • Surgery in Low and Middle Income Countries
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Perioperative pain management is an essential component to improving patient outcomes. Measurement and description of pain are challenging and vary in different contexts. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of self-reporting via visual analogue scales using the Jerrycan visual analogue scale in the assessment of post-operative pain and to validate the use of this novel scale compared to standard pain scales.

Materials and methods

Two hundred and forty-one inpatients who underwent surgical procedures were prospectively assessed for post-operative pain over a 12-month period from February 2016 to January 2017. Participants included patients who underwent general surgery, orthopedic and obstetrics/gynecology procedures. On post-operative day one, four scales were assessed: Verbal scale, Hands scale, Faces scale and Jerrycan scale, each ranging from 0–5. Scores for each scale were recorded, and agreements between scales were calculated using kappa values and Spearman's rank coefficients.

Results

The mean age was 34.8 years and more female subjects were evaluated (68%). The majority received spinal anesthesia (61%). The mean pain score was 2.5 for all scales. The Jerrycan (0.50) and Faces scales (0.43) had moderate agreements with the Verbal scale. Participants preferred the Jerrycan Pain Scale.

Conclusion

The Jerrycan pain scale had comparable scores and reasonable agreement with 3 other pain scales among a cohort of post-operative patients. Patient preference and ease of use of the Jerrycan scale may impact assessment and management of pain in a rural African setting. This scale may be adapted for use in similar resource settings for post-operative pain management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brunton S (2004) Approach to assessment and diagnosis of chronic pain. J Fam Pract 53(10 Suppl):S3–S10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aziato L, Dedey F, Marfo K et al (2015) Validation of three pain scales among adult postoperative patients in Ghana. BMC Nurs 14(1):42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Masigati HG, Chilonga K (2014) Postoperative pain management outcomes among adults treated at a tertiary hospital in Moshi. Tanzania Tanzan J Health Res 16(1):47–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kintu A, Abdulla S, Lubikire A et al (2019) Postoperative pain after cesarean section: assessment and management in a tertiary hospital in a low-income country. BMC Health Serv Res 19(1):68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mwaka G, Thikra S, Mung'ayi V (2013) The prevalence of postoperative pain in the first 48 hours following day surgery at a tertiary hospital in Nairobi. Afr Health Sci 13(3):768–776

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S et al (2001) The visual analogue scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology 95(6):1356–1361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bech R, Lauritsen J, Ovesen O et al (2015) The verbal rating scale is reliable for assessment of postoperative pain in hip fracture patients. Pain Res Treat 2015:676212

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hartrick C, Kovan J, Shapiro S (2003) The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure? Pain Pract 3(4):310–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blum D, Selman L, Agupio G et al (2014) Self-report measurement of pain & symptoms in palliative care patients: a comparison of verbal, visual and hand scoring methods in Sub-Saharan Africa. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12(1):118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Altman D (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 277–321

    Google Scholar 

  11. Adwok E, Ocitti J (2000) Post-operative management of pain following major abdominal and thoracic operations. East Afr Med J 77(6):299–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Woldehaimanot T, Eshetie T, Kerie M (2014) Postoperative pain management among surgically treated patients in an Ethiopian hospital. PLoS ONE 9(7):e102835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zborowski M (1952) Cultural components in response to pain. J Soc Issues 8(4):16–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peacock S, Patel S (2008) Cultural influences on pain. Rev Pain 1(2):6–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA et al (2016) Management of postoperative pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain 17(2):131–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kranke P, Weibel S (2018) Pain relief during labour: challenging the use of intramuscular pethidine. Lancet 392(10148):617–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O'Connor A, Schug SA, Cardwell H (2000) A comparison of the efficacy and safety of morphine and pethidine as analgesia for suspected renal colic in the emergency setting. J Accid Emerg Med 17(4):261–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stull DE, Leidy NK, Parasuraman B et al (2009) Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions. Curr Med Res Opin 25(4):929–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by a study grant from Research for Health Inc. Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44223

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Mwachiro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declared no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Tenwek Hospital Institutional Ethics and Research Committee.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mwachiro, M., Mwachiro, E., Wachu, M. et al. Assessing Post-operative Pain with Self-reports via the Jerrycan Pain Scale in Rural Kenya. World J Surg 44, 3636–3642 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05685-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05685-x

Navigation