Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of the Glissonean Pedicle Transection Approach in Spiegel Lobe-Preserving Left Hepatectomy on Spiegel Lobe Volume and Remnant Liver Functions

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The extrahepatic surgical technique in liver resection can be divided into glissonean pedicle transection and glissonean separated transection approaches. In this study, we compared remnant liver function and liver regeneration involving the Spiegel lobe between these two approaches regarding Spiegel lobe-preserving left hepatectomy.

Methods

We enrolled 31 patients who underwent Spiegel lobe-preserving left hepatectomy for malignant hepatobiliary diseases between April 2008 and January 2020. The postoperative Spiegel lobe volume was measured using a volume analyzer at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results

Of the 31 patients, 22 and 9 were included in the glissonean separated transection and glissonean pedicle transection groups, respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the preoperative Spiegel lobe volume. However, the volumes at 3 and 6 months postoperatively were significantly larger in the glissonean pedicle transection group than in the glissonean transection group (29.92 mL vs. 13.00 mL; P < 0.001 and 28.43 mL vs. 15.01 mL; P < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant between-group difference in postoperative remnant liver function.

Conclusions

The postoperative Spiegel lobe volume was larger, and liver regeneration was better with the glissonean pedicle transection approach because of transection for Spiegel branch of the portal vein. It is desirable to preserve Spiegel branch in possible cases when surgeons select the glissonean separated transection approach based on the location and size of the tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig.2
Fig.3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Livraghi T, Mäksalo H, Line PD (2011) Treatment options in hepatocellular carcinoma today. Scand J Surg 100:22–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rotellar F, Prado F, Benito A, Martí-Cruchaga P, Zozaya G, Pedano N (2012) A novel extra-glissonian approach for totally laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 26:2617–2622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Couinaud CM (1985) A simplified method for controlled left hepatectomy. Surgery 97:358–361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Takasaki K (1998) Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic resection: a new concept of liver segmentation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 5:286–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ji B, Wang Y, Wang G, Liu Y (2012) Curative resection of hepatocelluar carcinoma using modified glissonean pedicle transection versus the pringle maneuver: a case control study. Int J Med Sci 9:843–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho A, Asano T, Yamamoto H, Nagata M, Takiguchi N, Kainuma O et al (2007) Laparoscopy-assisted hepatic lobectomy using hilar Glissonean pedicle transection. Surg Endosc 21:1466–1468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lortat-Jacob JL, Robert HG (1952) Well defined technic for right hepatectomy. Presse Med 60:549–551

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Honjo I, Araki C (1955) Total resection of the right lobe of the liver; report of a successful case. J Int Coll Surg 23:23–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumon M (2017) Anatomical study of the caudate lobe with special reference to portal venous and biliary branches using corrosion liver casts and clinical application. Liver Cancer 6:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Makuuchi M, Kosuge T, Takayama T, Yamazaki S, Kakazu T, Miyagawa S et al (1993) Surgery for small liver cancers. Semin Surg Oncol 9:298–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshikawa T, Nomi T, Hokuto D, Yasuda S, Kawaguchi C, Yamada T et al (2017) Risk factors for postoperative ascites in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 41:2095–2100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4003-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nomi T, Hokuto D, Yoshikawa T, Matsuo Y, Sho M (2018) A novel navigation for laparoscopic anatomical liver resection using indocyanine green fluorescence. Ann Surg Oncol 25:3982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Brooke-Smith M, Crawford M, Adam R et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149:713–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely avaiable easy-to-use software ' EZR ' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamamoto M, Katagiri S, Ariizumi S, Kotera Y, Takahashi Y (2012) Glissonean pedicle transection method for liver surgery (with video). J Hepatobilliary Pancreat Sci 19:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang T, Zhang J, Lu JH, Yang GS, Wu MC, Yu WF (2011) Risk factors influencing postoperative outcomes of major hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma for patients with underlying liver diseases. World J Surg 35:2073–2082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1161-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujii M, Shimada M, Satoru I, Morine Y, Ikemoto T, Soejima Y (2007) A standardized safe hepatectomy; selective Glissonean transection using endolinear stapling devices. Hepatogastroenterology 54:906–909

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aoki T, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Kishi Y, Kobayashi T, Sugawara Y et al (2011) Convergence process of volumetric liver regeneration after living-donor hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1594–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamanaka N, Okamoto E, Kawamura E, Kato T, Oriyama T, Fujimoto J et al (1993) Dynamics of normal and injured human liver regeneration after hepatectomy as assessed on the basis of computed tomography and liver function. Hepatology 18:79–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Truant S, Bouras AF, Petrovai G, Buob D, Ernst O, Boleslawski E et al (2013) Volumetric gain of the liver after major hepatectomy in obese patients: a case-matched study in 84 patients. Ann Surg 258:696–702 discussion 702–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamaguchi T, Kokubo T, Akamatsu N, Kaneko J, Arita J, Sakamoto Y et al (2018) Liver regeneration is preserved after at least four repeated liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 42:4070–4080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4714-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ibis C, Asenov Y, Akin M, Azamat IF, Sivrikoz N, Gurtekin B (2017) Factors affecting liver regeneration in living donors after hepatectomy. Med Sci Monit 18:5986–5993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Matot I, Nachmansson N, Duev O, Schulz S, Schroeder-Stein K, Frede S et al (2017) Impaired liver regeneration after hepatectomy and bleeding is associated with a shift from hepatocyte proliferation to hypertrophy. FASEB J 31:5283–5295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the work of the past and present members of our division.

Funding

This study did not receive funding from any organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NK conducted the literature search and review, collected data, and drafted the manuscript. TN and DH proofread the manuscript. TY and YM discussed the significance of this manuscript. MS reviewed the manuscript and provided advice regarding the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeo Nomi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamitani, N., Nomi, T., Hokuto, D. et al. Influence of the Glissonean Pedicle Transection Approach in Spiegel Lobe-Preserving Left Hepatectomy on Spiegel Lobe Volume and Remnant Liver Functions. World J Surg 44, 3079–3085 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05548-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05548-5

Navigation