Skip to main content

Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy in the Management of Postoperative Leakage After Esophagectomy

Abstract

Background

Postoperative leakage after esophagectomy is associated with significant life-threatening complications. Recently, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) was introduced and has been successfully used as a new treatment option. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EVT for the management of postoperative leakage after esophagectomy.

Methods

A total of 22 patients were treated with either intraluminal or intracavitary EVT for the management of postoperative leakage from May 2012 to April 2018. The location of leakage was intrathoracic in 17 patients and cervical in five patients. The outcomes of EVT were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Complete postoperative leakage closure was achieved in 19 of 22 patients. The median duration of EVT application was 14 days (range 2–103), and a median number of three EVT systems (range 1–14) were used. In 19 patients who were successfully managed with EVT, oral feeding was possible a median of 15 days after the first day of treatment. There were no cases of mortality related to postoperative leakage.

Conclusions

EVT is a well-tolerated and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of various types of postoperative leakage after esophagectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Ryan CE, Paniccia A, Meguid RA et al (2017) Transthoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: current trends. Ann Surg Oncol 24:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu YJ, Fan J, He HH et al (2018) Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 8:e021025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–640

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rutegard M, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I et al (2012) Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 19:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michel L, Grillo HC, Malt RA (1981) Operative and nonoperative management of esophageal perforations. Ann Surg 194:57–63

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schaheen L, Blackmon SH, Nason KS (2014) Optimal approach to the management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy: a systematic review. Am J Surg 208:536–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weidenhagen R, Hartl WH, Gruetzner KU et al (2010) Anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection: new treatment options by endoluminal vacuum therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 90:1674–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Loske G, Schorsch T, Muller C (2011) Intraluminal and intracavitary vacuum therapy for esophageal leakage: a new endoscopic minimally invasive approach. Endoscopy 43:540–544

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuehn F, Schiffmann L, Rau BM et al (2012) Surgical endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leakage and perforation of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Gastrointest Surg 16:2145–2150

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brangewitz M, Voigtlander T, Helfritz FA et al (2013) Endoscopic closure of esophageal intrathoracic leaks: stent versus endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure, a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy 45:433–438

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schniewind B, Schafmayer C, Voehrs G et al (2013) Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy is superior to other regimens in managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a comparative retrospective study. Surg Endosc 27:3883–3890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuehn F, Schiffmann L, Janisch F et al (2016) Surgical endoscopic vacuum therapy for defects of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Gastrointest Surg 20:237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuehn F, Loske G, Schiffmann L et al (2017) Endoscopic vacuum therapy for various defects of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Surg Endosc 31:3449–3458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dhayat SA, Schacht R, Mennigen R, et al (2018) Long-term quality of life assessment after successful endoscopic vacuum therapy of defects in the upper gastrointestinal tract quality of life after EVT. J Gastrointest Surg 23:280–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Noh SM, Ahn JY, Lee JH et al (2018) Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy in patients with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a single-center experience. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018:1697968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang JJ, Jeong YS, Park YS et al (2016) Comparison of endoscopic vacuum therapy and endoscopic stent implantation with self-expandable metal stent in treating postsurgical gastroesophageal leakage. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3416

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ (1997) Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg 38:563–576; discussion 577

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Loske G (2019) Endoscopic negative pressure therapy of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Chirurg 90:1–6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ooi G, Burton P, Packiyanathan A et al (2018) Indications and efficacy of endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy for upper gastrointestinal perforations. ANZ J Surg 88:E257–e263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Laukoetter MG, Mennigen R, Neumann PA et al (2017) Successful closure of defects in the upper gastrointestinal tract by endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT): a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 31:2687–2696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pournaras DJ, Hardwick RH, Safranek PM et al (2018) Endoluminal vacuum therapy (E-Vac): a treatment option in oesophagogastric surgery. World J Surg 42:2507–2511

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Loske G, Muller CT (2019) Tips and tricks for endoscopic negative pressure therapy. Chirurg 90:7–14

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, et al (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198:536–541; discussion 541–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanaka K, Makino T, Yamasaki M et al (2018) An analysis of the risk factors of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. Surg Today 48:449–454

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Neumann PA, Mennigen R, Palmes D et al (2017) Pre-emptive endoscopic vacuum therapy for treatment of anastomotic ischemia after esophageal resections. Endoscopy 49:498–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gubler C, Vetter D, Schmidt HM et al (2019) Preemptive endoluminal vacuum therapy to reduce anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a game-changing approach? Dis Esophagus 32:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  27. Loske G, Schorsch T, Muller CT (2017) Prevention of reflux after esophagectomy with endoscopic negative pressure therapy using a new double-lumen open-pore film drainage with an intestinal feeding tube. Endoscopy 49:e294–e295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Page RD, Asmat A, McShane J et al (2013) Routine endoscopy to detect anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 95:292–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schaible A, Sauer P, Hartwig W et al (2014) Radiologic versus endoscopic evaluation of the conduit after esophageal resection: a prospective, blinded, intraindividually controlled diagnostic study. Surg Endosc 28:2078–2085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lenzen H, Negm AA, Erichsen TJ et al (2013) Successful treatment of cervical esophageal leakage by endoscopic-vacuum assisted closure therapy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 5:340–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwhanmien Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeon, J.H., Jang, H.J., Han, J.E. et al. Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy in the Management of Postoperative Leakage After Esophagectomy. World J Surg 44, 179–185 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05228-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05228-z