Abstract
Background
Calcified lymph nodes (LNs) on computed tomography (CT) in patients with lung cancer are generally considered to be a benign feature. However, few studies have evaluated the pathological status of such calcified LNs. We investigated the clinicopathological findings of patients with calcified LNs on preoperative CT who underwent operation for lung cancer and assessed the frequency of metastasis to calcified LNs as well as the risk factors associated with such metastases.
Methods
This was a retrospective study of 72 consecutive patients with calcified LNs detected on preoperative CT who underwent pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer between 2011 and 2013. A total of 354 LN stations including 101 LN stations with calcified LNs were evaluated.
Results
The frequency of metastasis to calcified LNs was 19.4% (14 of 72 patients) on a per-person basis and 18.8% (19 of 101 stations) on a per-nodal station basis. When the size of calcification was major (>5 mm), the frequency of metastasis to such calcified LNs was significantly lower than when it was minor (≦5 mm) on a per-nodal station basis (11.1% vs 27.7%, P = 0.043). Furthermore, when the size of calcification was major and the status of LN stations with calcified LNs was single, there was no metastasis to such LN stations (0 of 26 stations).
Conclusions
The frequency of metastasis to calcified LNs was about 20% on both a per-person and a per-nodal station basis. Although calcified LNs as well as non-calcified LNs should be dissected during operation, dissection of a single LN station with calcification, particularly major calcification, can be omitted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ohtsuka T, Nomori H, Watanabe K et al (2005) False-positive findings on [18F]FDG-PET caused by non-neoplastic cellular elements after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35:271–273
Fischer BM, Mortensen J (2006) The future in diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: positron emission tomography. Respiration 73:267–276
Konishi J, Yamazaki K, Tsukamoto E et al (2003) Mediastinal lymph node staging by FDG-PET in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of false-positive FDG-PET findings. Respiration 70:500–506
Kim BT, Lee KS, Shim SS et al (2006) Stage T1 non-small cell lung cancer: preoperative mediastinal nodal staging with integrated FDG PET/CT—a prospective study. Radiology 241:501–509
Shim SS, Lee KS, Kim BT et al (2005) Non-small cell lung cancer: prospective comparison of integrated FDG PET/CT and CT alone for preoperative staging. Radiology 236:1011–1019
Yoon YC, Lee KS, Shim YM et al (2007) Metastasis to regional lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: CT versus FDG PET for presurgical detection—prospective study. Radiology 227:764–770
Park JS, Kim HK, Choi YS et al (2011) Unplanned conversion to thoracotomy during video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy does not compromise the surgical outcome. World J Surg 35:590–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0913-6
Kim YK, Lee KS, Kim BT et al (2007) Mediastinal nodal staging of nonsmall cell lung cancer using integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT in a tuberculosis-endemic country: diagnostic efficacy in 674 patients. Cancer 109:1068–1077
Suwatanapongched T, Gierada DS (2006) CT of thoracic lymph nodes. Part II: diseases and pitfalls. Br J Radiol 79:999–1000
Brown K, Mund DF, Aberle DR et al (1994) Intrathoracic calcifications: radiographic features and differential diagnoses. Radiographics 14:1247–1261
Austin JH, Grimes MM, Carberry D (1988) CT detection of calcified nodal metastases of lung adenocarcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12:314–316
Mallens WM, Nijhuis-Heddes JM, Bakker W (1986) Calcified lymph node metastases in bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. Radiology 161:103–104
Jin KN, Moon HJ, Sung YW et al (2013) Preoperative computed tomography of the chest in lung cancer patients: the predictive value of calcified lymph nodes for the perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Eur Radiol 23:3278–3286
Samson P, Guitron J, Reed MF et al (2013) Predictors of conversion to thoracotomy for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a retrospective analysis and the influence of computed tomography-based calcification assessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145:1512–1518
Lim CG, Shin KM, Lim JS et al (2017) Predictors of conversion to thoracotomy during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy in lung cancer: additional predictive value of FDG-PET/CT in a tuberculosis endemic region. J Thorac Dis 9:2427–2436
Byun CS, Lee S, Kim DJ et al (2015) Analysis of unexpected conversion to thoracotomy during thoracoscopic lobectomy in lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 100:968–973
McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB (2006) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 81:421–425
Rami-Porta R, Crowley JJ, Goldstraw P (2009) The revised TNM staging system for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 15:4–9
Rusch VW, Asamura H, Watanabe H et al (2009) The IASLC lung cancer staging project: a proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4:568–577
Takamochi K, Yokose T, Yoshida J et al (2003) Calcification in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung. Jpn J Clin Oncol 33:10–13
Webb WR (1990) Radiologic evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:701–708
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There were no disclosures of interest of all the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakanishi, K., Nakagawa, K., Asakura, K. et al. Is Calcification in the Regional Lymph Nodes a Benign Feature in Patients with Lung Cancer?. World J Surg 43, 1850–1856 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04937-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04937-9