Skip to main content

Noise in the Operating Room Distracts Members of the Surgical Team. An Observational Study

World Journal of Surgery volume 42, pages 3880–3887 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Noise pollution in operation rooms may distract the surgical team members. In particular during phases of high task complexity, noise can jeopardize concentration. Phases of high complexity are related to task specificities and may thus be different for different members of the surgical team.

Study design

Noise exposure was measured during 110 open abdominal surgeries. Distinguishing three phases (opening, main phase, and closing), noise was related to self-report of distraction levels by main and secondary surgeons, scrub nurses and anesthetists.

Results

Noise pollution was higher than recommended levels for concentrated work. Adjusted for duration, surgical type, and difficulty of the surgery, results showed that second surgeons are more likely distracted when noise pollution was high in the main phase; and anesthetists are more likely distracted when noise pollution was high during the closing phase. Main surgeons’ and scrub nurses’ concentration was not impaired by measured noise levels.

Conclusions

In phases with higher concentration demands, noise pollution was particularly distracting for second surgeons and anesthetist, corresponding to their specific task demands (anesthetists) and experience (second surgeons). Reducing noise levels particularly in the main and closing phase of the surgery may reduce concentration impairments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Katz JD (2014) Noise in the operating room. Surv Anesthesiol 121:894–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shankar N, Malhotra K, Ahuja S et al (2001) Noise pollution: a study of noise levels in the operation theatres of a general hospital during various surgical procedures. J Indian Med Assoc 99:244–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kam P, Kam A, Thompson J (1994) Noise pollution in the anaesthetic and intensive care environment. Anaesthesia 49:982–986

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Healey AN, Primus CP, Koutantji M (2007) Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 16:135–139

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger EH, Royster LH, Royster JD et al (2003) The noise manual. American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax

  6. Engelmann CR, Neis JP, Kirschbaum C et al (2014) A noise-reduction program in a pediatric operation theatre is associated with surgeon’s benefits and a reduced rate of complications: a prospective controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 259:1025–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alshammari D, Sica M, Osailan S et al (2017) Noise in a university operating theatre during the cours of pediatric surgical procedures. Curr Pediatr Res 21:572–576

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hasfeldt D, Laerkner E, Birkelund R (2010) Noise in the operating room–what do we know? A review of the literature. J Perianesth Nurs 25:380–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hodge B, Thompson JF (1990) Noise pollution in the operating theatre. Lancet 335:891–894

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsiou C, Efthymiatos G, Katostaras T (2008) Noise in the operating rooms of Greek hospitals. J Acoust Soc Am 123:757–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Witterseh T, Wyon DP, Clausen G (2004) The effects of moderate heat stress and open-plan office noise distraction on SBS symptoms and on the performance of office work. Indoor Air 14:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A et al (2014) Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet 383:1325–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rylander R (2004) Physiological aspects of noise-induced stress and annoyance. J Sound Vib 277:471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Szalma JL, Hancock PA (2011) Noise effects on human performance: a meta-analytic synthesis. Psychol Bull 137:682–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stansfeld SA, Matheson MP (2003) Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health. Br Med Bull 68:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baker MA, Holding DH (1993) The effects of noise and speech on cognitive task performance. J Gen Psychol 120:339–355

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurmann A, Peter M, Tschan F et al (2011) Adverse effect of noise in the operating theatre on surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 98:1021–1025

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grayson D, Boxerman S, Potter P, et al (2005) Do transient working conditions trigger medical errors?, DTIC Document

  19. Dholakia S, Jeans JP, Khalid U et al (2015) The association of noise and surgical-site infection in day-case hernia repairs. Surgery 157:1153–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A et al (2003) The effect of stress-inducing conditions on the performance of a laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 17:1481–1484

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pluyter JR, Buzink SN, Rutkowski A-F et al (2010) Do absorption and realistic distraction influence performance of component task surgical procedure? Surg Endosc 24:902–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Way TJ, Long A, Weihing J et al (2013) Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 216:933–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Keller S, Tschan F, Beldi G et al (2016) Noise peaks influence communication in the operating room. Observ Study Ergon 59:1541–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Undre S et al (2004) Objective evaluation of the effect of noise on the performance of a complex laparoscopic task. Surgery 136:25–30

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Suh IH, Chien JH, Mukherjee M et al (2010) The negative effect of distraction on performance of robot-assisted surgical skills in medical students and residents. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 6:377–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Murthy VS, Malhotra SK, Bala I et al (1995) Detrimental effects of noise on anaesthesists. Can J Anaesth 42:608–611

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stevenson RA, Schlesinger JJ, Wallace MT (2013) Effects of divided attention and operating room noise on perception of pulse oximeter pitch changes: a laboratory study. Anesthesiology 118:376–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Clark C, Sörqvist P (2012) A 3 year update on the influence of noise on performance and behavior. Noise Health 14:292–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Loewen LJ, Suedfeld P (1992) Cognitive and arousal effects of masking office noise. Environ Behav 24:381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wadhera RK, Parker SH, Burkhart HM et al (2010) Is the “sterile cockpit” concept applicable to cardiovascular surgery critical intervals or critical events? The impact of protocol-driven communication during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Parker SH, Flin R, McKinley A et al (2014) Factors influencing surgeons’ intraoperative leadership: video analysis of unanticipated events in the operating room. World J Surg 38:4–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2241-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Broom MA, Capek AL, Carachi P et al (2011) Critical phase distractions in anaesthesia and the sterile cockpit concept. Anaesthesia 66:175–179

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jenkins A, Wilkinson JV, Akeroyd MA et al (2015) Distractions during critical phases of anaesthesia for caesarean section: an observational study. Anaesthesia 70:543–548

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wadhera RK, Parker SH, Burkhart HM et al (2010) Is the “sterile cockpit” concept applicable to cardiovascular surgery critical intervals or critical events? The impact of protocol-driven communication during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kurmann A, Keller S, Tschan-Semmer F et al (2014) Impact of team familiarity in the operating room on surgical complications. World J Surg 38:3047–3052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2680-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ryherd EE, Okcu S, Ackerman J et al (2012) Noise pollution in hospitals: impacts on staff. JCOM 19:491–500

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ginsberg SH, Pantin E, Kraidin J et al (2013) Noise levels in modern operating rooms during surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 27:528–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tschan F, Seelandt JC, Keller S et al (2015) Impact of case-relevant and case-irrelevant communication within the surgical team on surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 102:1718–1725

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Katz P (1981) Ritual in the operating-room. Ethnology 20:335–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wahr JA, Prager RL, Abernathy JH 3rd et al (2013) Patient safety in the cardiac operating room: human factors and teamwork: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 128:1139–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hsu KE, Man FY, Gizicki RA et al (2008) Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:196–201

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Galvan C, Bacha EA, Mohr J et al (2005) A human factors approach to understanding patient safety during pediatric cardiac surgery. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 20:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Reiling J (2006) Safe design of healthcare facilities. Qual Saf Health Care 15(Suppl 1):i34–i40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. MacLeod M, Dunn J, Busch-Vishniac IJ et al (2007) Quieting Weinberg 5C: a case study in hospital noise control. J Acoust Soc Am 121:3501–3508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. South T (2004) Managing noise and vibration at work: a practical guide to assessment, measurement and control. Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Anita Kurmann, a scientific advisor for this study, deceased August 7, 2015. We thank Julia Seelandt for her help in organization of data collection and data collection; Anna Püschel, Moana Monnier and Nadja Jenni for their contribution to data collection; Uwe Klopsch (technician) and Brigitte Dubach (head nurse) for their technical and organizational support.

Funding

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation [grant # CR13I1_138273 and CR13I3_156882].

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sandra Keller and Franziska Tschan have equally contributed to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland

    Sandra Keller, Franziska Tschan & Eliane Holzer

  2. Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Norbert K. Semmer

  3. Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Daniel Candinas & Guido Beldi

  4. Federal Office for the Environment, Ittigen, Switzerland

    Mark Brink

Authors
  1. Sandra Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franziska Tschan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Norbert K. Semmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eliane Holzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daniel Candinas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mark Brink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Guido Beldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sandra Keller or Franziska Tschan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors declares a conflict of interest

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keller, S., Tschan, F., Semmer, N.K. et al. Noise in the Operating Room Distracts Members of the Surgical Team. An Observational Study. World J Surg 42, 3880–3887 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4730-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4730-7