Skip to main content
Log in

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Pyloromyotomy in Children: An Opportunity for Better Stewardship

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Surgical site infection is very uncommon after pyloromyotomy in children, and it is considered a “clean” procedure under the traditional wound classification system. This study aims to investigate prophylactic antibiotic administration for pyloromyotomy among children’s hospitals in the USA.

Methods

The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database was retrospectively reviewed from 2014 to 2015 including all patients less than 1 year old who had a principal diagnosis of pyloric stenosis and underwent pyloromyotomy. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay, and perioperative antibiotic administration were extracted.

Results

A total of 4206 patients met study criteria. Most patients were male (84%) and Caucasian (70%). The median age at admission was 32 days (IQR 24–44 days), and median length of stay was 2 days (IQR 1–2 days). Antibiotics were administered perioperatively in 2153 (51%) patients with marked variation among children’s hospitals. Antibiotics were given to more than 10% of patients in more than 90% of hospitals, and only two of 49 hospitals gave no antibiotic prophylaxis.

Conclusions

This study has shown that at several tertiary-level children’s hospitals in the USA, antibiotic prophylaxis is administered for pyloromyotomy, a “clean” procedure. This highlights the need for standardization of care and more effective antibiotic stewardship in pediatric surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cosgrove SE (2006) The relationship between antimicrobial resistance and patient outcomes: mortality, length of hospital stay, and health care costs. Clin Infect Dis 42(Suppl 2):S82–S89. https://doi.org/10.1086/499406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerber JS, Kronman MP, Ross RK, Hersh AL, Newland JG, Metjian TA, Zaoutis TE (2013) Identifying targets for antimicrobial stewardship in children’s hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34(12):1252–1258. https://doi.org/10.1086/673982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerber JS, Newland JG, Coffin SE, Hall M, Thurm C, Prasad PA, Feudtner C, Zaoutis TE (2010) Variability in antibiotic use at children’s hospitals. Pediatrics 126(6):1067–1073. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1275

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sandora TJ, Fung M, Melvin P, Graham DA, Rangel SJ (2016) National variability and appropriateness of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in US children’s hospitals. JAMA Pediatr 170(6):570–576. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan KH, Bell T, Cain M, Carroll A, Benneyworth BD (2017) Variation in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for outpatient pediatric urological procedures at United States children’s hospitals. J Urol 197(3 Pt 2):944–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz MS, Schwartz MZ, Moront ML, Arthur LG 3rd, Timmapuri SJ, Prasad R (2011) Prophylactic antibiotics do not decrease the incidence of wound infections after laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 46(6):1086–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzalez KW, Dalton BG, Kurtz B, Keirsey MC, Oyetunji TA, St Peter SD (2016) Operative wound classification: an inaccurate measure of pediatric surgical morbidity. J Pediatr Surg 51(11):1900–1903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.07.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Somme S, Bronsert M, Morrato E, Ziegler M (2013) Frequency and variety of inpatient pediatric surgical procedures in the United States. Pediatrics 132(6):e1466–e1472. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leinwand MJ, Shaul DB, Anderson KD (1999) The umbilical fold approach to pyloromyotomy: Is it a safe alternative to the right upper-quadrant approach? J Am Coll Surg 189(4):362–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mullassery D, Perry D, Goyal A, Jesudason EC, Losty PD (2008) Surgical practice for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in the United Kingdom and Ireland–a survey of members of the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons. J Pediatr Surg 43(6):1227–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ladd AP, Nemeth SA, Kirincich AN, Scherer LR 3rd, Engum SA, Rescorla FJ, West KW, Rouse TM, Billmire DF, Grosfeld JL (2005) Supraumbilical pyloromyotomy: a unique indication for antimicrobial prophylaxis. Journal of pediatric surgery 40(6):974–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.03.012 (discussion 977)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nour S, MacKinnon AE, Dickson JA, Walker J (1996) Antibiotic prophylaxis for infantile pyloromyotomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 41(3):178–180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahida JB, Asti L, Deans KJ, Minneci PC, Groner JI (2016) Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy decreases postoperative length of stay in children with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 51(9):1436–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.05.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oomen MW, Hoekstra LT, Bakx R, Ubbink DT, Heij HA (2012) Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on major complications. Surg Endosc 26(8):2104–2110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2174-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sola JE, Neville HL (2009) Laparoscopic vs open pyloromyotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 44(8):1631–1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prevention CfDCa (2013) Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the US. https://www.cdc.gov/features/antibioticresistancethreats/index.html. Accessed 21 Apr 2017

  17. Lessa FC, Mu Y, Bamberg WM, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati GK, Dunn JR, Farley MM, Holzbauer SM, Meek JI, Phipps EC, Wilson LE, Winston LG, Cohen JA, Limbago BM, Fridkin SK, Gerding DN, McDonald LC (2015) Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. New Engl J Med 372(9):825–834. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1408913

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rangel SJ, Fung M, Graham DA, Ma L, Nelson CP, Sandora TJ (2011) Recent trends in the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg 46(2):366–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.11.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan KH, Whittam BM, Moser EA, Cain MP, Bennett WE Jr (2016) Adverse events associated with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for outpatient circumcisions at US children’s hospitals. J Pediatr Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.10.017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Macy E (2014) Penicillin and beta-lactam allergy: epidemiology and diagnosis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 14(11):476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-014-0476-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vu LT, Nobuhara KK, Lee H, Farmer DL (2009) Conflicts in wound classification of neonatal operations. J Pediatr Surg 44(6):1206–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oyetunji TA, Gonzalez DO, Gonzalez KW, Nwomeh BC, St Peter SD (2016) Wound classification in pediatric surgical procedures: measured and found wanting. J Pediatr Surg 51(6):1014–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express sincere gratitude to the members of the Pediatric Health Research Outcomes Group for Surgery at Ann & Robert H Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago for assistance in data analysis.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KW assisted with data analysis and was the primary author of the manuscript. TL assisted with data analysis and carried out editing of the manuscript. RJH provided final editing of the manuscript. TAO conceptualized the project, performed data analysis, and supervised the preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tolulope A. Oyetunji.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The abstract of this manuscript was presented at the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group’s 26th Annual Congress for Endosurgery in Children in London, England, in July 2017. The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, K., Lautz, T., Hendrickson, R.J. et al. Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Pyloromyotomy in Children: An Opportunity for Better Stewardship. World J Surg 42, 4107–4111 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4729-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4729-0

Navigation