Skip to main content
Log in

Trends in the Use of Laparoscopic Versus Open Paediatric Appendicectomy: A Regional 12-Year Study and a National Survey

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In adult patients, it is generally accepted that laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) is the predominant operative pathway in treating acute appendicitis. The case for a similar pathway utilising LA in children is less clear. We investigate usage, trends and complications after LA in children in a single co-located adult/paediatric centre with contemporaneous adults as controls.

Methods

A retrospective case–control study was conducted over 12 years including patients who underwent appendicectomy, and the paediatric series (<16 years) was divided into age-groups-based quartiles. An anonymous questionnaire-based national survey was circulated among general and paediatric surgeons.

Results

Of the 5784 appendicectomy patients, 2960 were children. LA rate in paediatric appendicitis was 65%. Yearly trends in LA reached a steady state in both groups after 2010 (Δ 0–1%/year). Rates of LA and LA IAA (respectively) differed significantly between age groups: 60, 3% (0–9 years); 65, 1% (10–13 years); 71, 2% (14–16 years) and 93, 3% (>16 years) (p = 0.001, 0.02). The national survey showed respondents believed LA was not superior to OA in paediatric patients except in terms of cosmesis. There was strong support in the use of LA in older children and children >40 kg.

Conclusion

The use of LA in paediatric appendicectomies in the study region is similar to international rates, but not increasing over time. Irish surgeons still favour OA in younger children and prefer a case-by-case approach rather LA being the preferred pathway. This is despite the regional and international evidence showing favourable outcomes with LA in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvarez C, Voitk AJ (2000) The road to ambulatory laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis. Am J Surg 179(1):63–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin YY, Shabbir A, So JB (2010) Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents: evaluating outcomes and learning curve. Surg Endosc 24(1):125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Kum CK, Eypasch E, Miserez M, Paul A (1995) The E.A.E.S. consensus development conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements–September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 9(5):550–563

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiao Y, Shi G, Zhang J, Cao JG, Liu LJ, Chen TH, Li ZZ, Wang H, Zhang H, Lin ZF et al (2015) Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study. Surg Endosc 29(6):1384–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Katkhouda N, Friedlander MH, Grant SW, Achanta KK, Essani R, Paik P, Velmahos G, Campos G, Mason R, Mavor E (2000) Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 180(6):456–459 discussion 460–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Allemann P, Probst H, Demartines N, Schafer M (2011) Prevention of infectious complications after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis–the role of routine abdominal drainage. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(1):63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242(3):439–450

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Markar SR, Blackburn S, Cobb R, Karthikesalingam A, Evans J, Kinross J, Faiz O (2012) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in children. J Gastrointest Surg 16(10):1993–2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sahm M, Kube R, Schmidt S, Ritter C, Pross M, Lippert H (2011) Current analysis of endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Surg Endosc 25(1):124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Iqbal CW, Fike FB, Sharp SW, Juang D, Lanning D, Murphy JP, Andrews WS, Sharp RJ et al (2012) Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 256(4):581–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ (2014) Laparoscopic appendectomy trends and outcomes in the United States: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004–2011. Am Surg 80(10):1074–1077

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu Y, Cui Z, Zhang R (2017) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children. Indian Pediatr 54(11):938–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shah A (2008) A decade of minimal access pediatric surgery in India. J Indian Assoc Pediatric Surg 13(4):123–124. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.44760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP, Purkayastha S, Haddow J, Malinovski V, Paraskeva P, Darzi A (2006) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 243(1):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SL, Yaghoubian A, Kaji A (2011) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in children: outcomes comparison based on age, sex, and perforation status. Arch Surg (Chic Ill 1960) 146(10):1118–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kapischke M, Pries A, Caliebe A (2013) Short term and long term results after open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy in childhood and adolescence: a subgroup analysis. BMC Pediatrics 13:154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nataraja RM, Loukogeorgakis SP, Sherwood WJ, Clarke SA, Haddad MJ (2013) The incidence of intraabdominal abscess formation following laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(9):795–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nataraja RM, Teague WJ, Galea J, Moore L, Haddad MJ, Tsang T, Khurana S, Clarke SA (2012) Comparison of intraabdominal abscess formation after laparoscopic and open appendicectomies in children. J Pediatric Surg 47(2):317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sweeney KJ, Dillon M, Johnston SM, Keane FB, Conlon KC (2006) Training in laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg 30(3):358–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0311-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hospital In-Patient Enquiry. https://www.hiqa.ie/healthcare/health-information/data-collections/online-catalogue/hospital-patient-enquiry. Accessed 07 Dec16

  21. Chiu CC, Wei PL, Wang W, Chen RJ, Chen TC, Lee WJ, Huang MT (2006) Role of appendectomy in laparoscopic training. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(2):113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.phpSurgical_operations_and_procedures_statistics. Accessed 29 Nov 15

  23. York D, Smith A, von Allmen D, Phillips JD (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children after the learning curve. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 10(4):447–452

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robertson I, Costello M, Shea N, Khan I, Waldron RM, Khan W, Barry K (2016) Management of paediatric acute appendicitis in the general hospital setting: a national survey of preferred surgical technique. Irish J Med Sci 185(1):63–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tam PK (2000) Laparoscopic surgery in children. Arch Dis Childhood 82(3):240–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. http://www.jcst.org/quality-assurance/documents/cct-guidelines/general-surgery-cct-guidelines. Accessed 29 Nov 16

  27. Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JG, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr, Luks FI (2004) Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children. Surg Endosc 18(2):242–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolich MO, Ketana N, Carmichael JC, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ (2012) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006–2008. World J Surg 36(3):573–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1417-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Guana R, Lonati L, Garofalo S, Tommasoni N, Ferrero L, Cerrina A, Lemini R, Dallan C, Schleef J (2016) Laparoscopic versus open surgery in complicated appendicitis in children less than 5 years old: a six-year single-centre experience. Surg Res Pract 2016:5

    Google Scholar 

  30. Krisher SL, Browne A, Dibbins A, Tkacz N, Curci M (2001) Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg 136(4):438–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Reid RI, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA (1999) Risk factors for post-appendicectomy intra-abdominal abscess. Aust N Z J Surg 69(5):373–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. F. Ridgway.

Additional information

Meetings: British Association of Paediatric Surgeons (BAPS) 2017.

Appendix 1: The appendix survey

Appendix 1: The appendix survey

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhatt, N.R., Dunne, E., Faraz, M. et al. Trends in the Use of Laparoscopic Versus Open Paediatric Appendicectomy: A Regional 12-Year Study and a National Survey. World J Surg 42, 3792–3802 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4688-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4688-5

Navigation