World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 10, pp 3405–3414 | Cite as

Analysis of Early and Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Converted Laparoscopic Resection Compared to Primary Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer

  • Marco Ettore Allaix
  • Edgar Furnée
  • Laura Esposito
  • Massimiliano Mistrangelo
  • Fabrizio Rebecchi
  • Alberto Arezzo
  • Mario Morino
Original Scientific Report



Laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR) for cancer is a challenging procedure, with conversion to open surgery being reported in up to 30% of cases. Since only a few studies with short follow-up have compared converted LRR and open RR (ORR), it is unclear if conversion to open surgery should be prevented by preferring an open approach in those patients with preoperatively known risk factors for conversion. The aim of this study was to compare early postoperative outcomes and long-term survival after completed LRR, converted LRR or ORR for non-metastatic rectal cancer.


A prospective database of consecutive curative LRRs and ORRs for rectal cancer was reviewed. Patients undergoing LRR who required conversion (CONV group) were compared with those who had primary open rectal surgery (OPEN group) and completed LRR (LAP group). A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of poor survival.


A total of 537 patients were included in the study: 272 in the LAP group, 49 in the CONV group and 216 in the OPEN group. There were no significant differences in perioperative morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay between the three groups. Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates did not significantly differ between LAP, CONV and OPEN patients: 83.9 versus 77.8 versus 81% (P = 0.398) and 74.5 versus 62.9 versus 72.7% (P = 0.145), respectively. Similar 5-year OS and DFS rates were observed between patients who had converted LRR for locally advanced tumor or for non-tumor-related reasons: 81.2 versus 80.8% (P = 0.839) and 62.5 versus 63.7% (P = 0.970), respectively. Poor grade of tumor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion and a lymph node ratio of 0.25 or greater, but not conversion, were independently associated with poorer survival.


Conversion to open surgery does not impair short-term outcomes and does not jeopardize 5-year survival in patients with rectal cancer when compared to primary open surgery.


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Arezzo A, Passera R, Scozzari G, Verra M, Morino M (2013) Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27:1485–1502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu MO, Poulin EC (2000) Predicting conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal resections: a simple clinical model. Surg Endosc 14:1114–1117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19:47–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cima RR, Hassan I, Poola VP, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Larson DR, O’Byrne MM, Huebner M (2010) Failure of institutionally derived predictive models of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery to predict conversion outcomes in an independent data set of 998 laparoscopic colorectal procedures. Ann Surg 251(4):652–658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vaccaro CA, Rossi GL, Quintana GO, Soriano ER, Vaccarezza H, Rubinstein F (2014) Laparoscopic colorectal resections: a simple predictor model and a stratification risk for conversion to open surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 57(7):869–874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang GD, Zhi XT, Zhang JL, Bu GB, Ma G, Wang KL (2015) Preoperative prediction of conversion from laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery: a clinical study of conversion scoring of laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:1209–1216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20:947–951CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Franko J, Fassler SA, Rezvani M, O’Connell BG, Harper SG, Nejman JH, Zebley DM (2008) Conversion of laparoscopic colon resection does not affect survival in colon cancer. Surg Endosc 22:2631–2634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ptok H, Kube R, Schmidt U, Köckerling F, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Colon/Rectum Carcinoma (Primary Tumor) Study Group (2009) Conversion from laparoscopic to open colonic cancer resection - associated factors and their influence on long-term oncological outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:1273–1279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li JC, Lee JF, Ng SS, Yiu RY, Hon SS, Leung WW, Leung KL (2010) Conversion in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for right colon cancer: risk factors and clinical outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:983–988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Arezzo A, Arolfo S, Morino M (2013) Does conversion affect short-term and oncologic outcomes after laparoscopy for colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc 27:4596–4607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chew MH, Ng KH, Fook-Chong MC, Eu KW (2011) Redefining conversion in laparoscopic colectomy and its influence on outcomes: analysis of 418 cases from a single institution. World J Surg 35:178–185. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clancy C, O’Leary DP, Burke JP, Redmond HP, Coffey JC, Kerin MJ, Myers E (2015) A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 17:482–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li J, Guo H, Guan XD, Cai CN, Yang LK, Li YC, Zhu YH, Li PP, Liu XL, Yang DJ (2015) The impact of laparoscopic converted to open colectomy on short-term and oncologic outcomes for colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 19:335–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Masoomi H, Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ (2015) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery: does conversion worsen outcome? World J Surg 39:1240–1247. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yerokun BA, Adam MA, Sun Z, Kim J, Sprinkle S, Migaly J, Mantyh CR (2016) Does conversion in laparoscopic colectomy portend an inferior oncologic outcome? Results from 104,400 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1042–1048CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Allaix ME, Furnée EJ, Mistrangelo M, Arezzo A, Morino M (2016) Conversion of laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: What is the impact on short-term outcomes and survival? World J Gastroenterol 22(37):8304–8313CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Agha A, Fürst A, Iesalnieks I, Fichtner-Feigl S, Ghali N, Krenz D, Anthuber M, Jauch KW, Piso P, Schlitt HJ (2008) Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:409–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rottoli M, Bona S, Rosati R, Elmore U, Bianchi PP, Spinelli A, Bartolucci C, Montorsi M (2009) Laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: effects of conversion on short-term outcome and survival. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1279–1286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yamamoto S, Fukunaga M, Miyajima N, Okuda J, Konishi F, Watanabe M (2009) Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1073 patients. J Am Coll Surg 208:383–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wütrich P, Scheffler M, Rullier E (2009) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long term oncologic results. Ann Surg 250:54–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mroczkowski P, Hac S, Smith B, Schmidt U, Lippert H, Kube R (2012) Laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer in Germany 2000–2009. Colorectal Dis 14(12):1473–1478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rickert A, Herrle F, Doyon F, Post S, Kienle P (2013) Influence of conversion on the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer compared with primarily open resection. Surg Endosc 27:4675–4683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Penninckx F, Kartheuser A, Van de Stadt J, Pattyn P, Mansvelt B, Bertrand C, Van Eycken E, Jegou D, Fieuws S (2013) Outcome following laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:1368–1375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Keller DS, Khorgami Z, Swendseid B, Champagne BJ, Reynolds HL Jr, Stein SL, Delaney CP (2014) Laparoscopic and converted approaches to rectal cancer resection have superior long-term outcomes: a comparative study by operative approach. Surg Endosc 28:1940–1948CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American joint committee on cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1471–1474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ng KH, Chung-Kei D, Cheung HY et al (2009) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancers: lessons learned from 579 cases. Ann Surg 249:82–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, COLOR II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yang C, Wexner SD, Safar B, Jobanputra S, Jin H, Li VK, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, Sands DR (2009) Conversion in laparoscopic surgery: Does intraoperative complication influence outcome? Surg Endosc 23:2454–2458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aytac E, Stocchi L, Ozdemir Y, Kiran RP (2013) Factors affecting morbidity after conversion of laparoscopic colorectal resections. Br J Surg 100:1641–1648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the medical research council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bottger TC, Mohseni D, Beardi J, Rodehorst A (2011) Learning curve in laparoscopic rectum surgery. Zentralbl Chir 136:273–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, Kang BM, Jun SH (2009) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 23:839–846CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Ettore Allaix
    • 1
  • Edgar Furnée
    • 1
  • Laura Esposito
    • 1
  • Massimiliano Mistrangelo
    • 1
  • Fabrizio Rebecchi
    • 1
  • Alberto Arezzo
    • 1
  • Mario Morino
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations