Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical Significance of New Magnetic Resonance Thoracic Ductography Before Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Preoperative simulation of the thoracic duct using magnetic resonance thoracic ductography (MRTD) would enable a safe lymph node dissection near the thoracic duct and the prevention of chylothorax after an esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to determine whether MRTD is useful for preventing injury to the thoracic duct during surgery and for reducing the incidence of chylothorax after surgery.

Methods

We evaluated 130 patients who underwent preoperative MRTD followed by a thoracoscopic esophagectomy for the treatment of thoracic esophageal cancer between August 2014 and April 2017 (MRTD group). These patients were then compared with 160 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent a thoracoscopic esophagectomy without preoperative MRTD (non-MRTD group).

Results

Four patients in the non-MRTD group developed Type IIIB chylothorax (International Consensus on Standardization), while none of the patients in the MRTD group developed Type III chylothorax. Some type of abnormal finding was found during MRTD in 24 patients (18.5%). Among them, 13 patients (10.0%) exhibited abnormal divergence, which was the most frequent finding, followed by 5 patients (3.8%) with window formation and 2 patients (1.5%) with stitch formation.

Conclusions

The present study revealed the frequencies of abnormal findings of the thoracic duct and of patients with false-negative MRTD findings. Injury to the thoracic duct can be avoided through the use of appropriate care during procedures performed in patients with abnormal findings on preoperative MRTD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Udagawa H, Ueno M, Shinohara H et al (2014) Should lymph nodes along the thoracic duct be dissected routinely in radical esophagectomy? Esophagus 11:204–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kotani M (1990) The lymphatics and lymphoreticular tissues in relation to the action of sex hormones. Arch Histol Cytol 53:1–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van der Putte SCJ, van Limborgh J (1980) The embryonic development of the main lymphatics in man. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand 18:323–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams KR, Burford TH (1964) The management of chylothorax. Ann Surg 160:131–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wemyss-Holden SA, Launois B, Maddern GJ (2001) Management of thoracic dust injuries after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 88:1442–1448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozawa S, Ito E, Kazuno A et al (2013) Thoracoscopic esophagectomy while in a prone position for esophageal cancer: a preceding anterior approach method. Surg Endosc 27:40–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nomura T, Niwa T, Kazama T et al (2016) Balanced turbo field echo with extended κ-space sampling: a fast technique for the thoracic ductography. Magn Reson Med Sci 15:405–410

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I et al (2015) International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy. Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann Surg 262:286–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayashi S, Miyazaki M (1999) Thoracic duct: visualization at nonenhanced MR lymphography—initial experience. Radiology 212:598–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Okuda I, Udagawa H, Takahashi J et al (2009) Magnetic resonance-thoracic ductography: imaging aid for thoracic surgery and thoracic duct depiction based on embryological consideration. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 57:640–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu DX, Ma XX, Wang Q et al (2013) Morphological changes of the thoracic duct and accessory lymphatic channels in patients with chylothorax: detection with unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 23:702–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takanami K, Ichikawa H, Fukuda H et al (2012) Three-dimensional lymphoscintigraphy using SPECT/CT and 123I-BMIPP for the preoperative detection of anatomical anomalies of the thoracic duct. Clin Nucl Med 37:1047–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Adachi B (1953) Der Ductus Thoracicus der Japaner. In: Das Lymphgefasssystem der Japaner, Kenkyu-sha, Tokyo, p 1–83

  14. Okuda I, Udagawa H, Hirata K et al (2011) Depiction of the thoracic duct by magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and the anatomical literature. Jpn J Radiol 29:39–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dougenis D, Walker WS, Cameron EW et al (1992) Management of chylothorax complicating extensive esophageal resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174:501–506

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lai FC, Chen L, Tu YR et al (2011) Prevention of chylothorax complicating extensive esophageal resection by mass ligation of thoracic duct: a random control study. Ann Thorac Surg 91:1770–1774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mishra PK, Saluja SS, Ramaswamy D et al (2013) Thoracic duct injury following esophagectomy in carcinoma of the esophagus: ligation by the abdominal approach. World J Surg 37:141–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1811-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C et al (2002) Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 236:177–183

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao DV, Chava SP, Sahni P et al (2004) Thoracic duct injury during esophagectomy: 20 years experience at a tertiary care center in a developing country. Dis Esophagus 17:141–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shah RD, Luketich JD, Schuchert MJ et al (2012) Postesophagectomy chylothorax: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 93:897–904

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cefolio RJ, Allen MS, Deschamps C et al (1996) Postoperative chylothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:1361–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Orringer MB, Bluett M, Deeb GM (1988) Aggressive treatment of chylothorax complicating trabshiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy. Surgery 104:720–726

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaburagi T, Takeuchi H, Oyama T et al (2013) Intraoperative fluorescence lymphography using indocyanine green in a patients with chylothorax after esophagectomy: report of a case. Surg Today 43:206–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dexter SPL, Martin IG, McMahonz MJ (1996) Radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Endosc 10:147–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–495

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Smithers BM, Gotley DC, McEwan D et al (2001) Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus: a 6-year experience. Surg Endosc 15:176–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan

    Junya Oguma, Soji Ozawa, Akihito Kazuno, Miho Nitta, Yamato Ninomiya & Kentaro Yatabe

  2. Department of Radiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan

    Tetsu Niwa & Takakiyo Nomura

Authors
  1. Junya Oguma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Soji Ozawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Akihito Kazuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Miho Nitta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yamato Ninomiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kentaro Yatabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tetsu Niwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Takakiyo Nomura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soji Ozawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oguma, J., Ozawa, S., Kazuno, A. et al. Clinical Significance of New Magnetic Resonance Thoracic Ductography Before Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. World J Surg 42, 1779–1786 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4372-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4372-1

Search

Navigation