References
Waalewijn BP, van Duinen A, Koroma AP et al (2017) Learning curve characteristic for caesarean section among associate clinicians: a prospective study from Sierra Leone. World J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4202-5
Molina G, Weiser TG, Lipsitz SR et al (2015) Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. JAMA 314:2263–2270
Esteves-Pereira AP, Deneux-Thanaux C, Nakamura-Pereira M et al (2016) Caeserian delivery and postpartum maternal mortality: a population-based case control study in Brazil. PLoS ONE 11:e0153396. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153396
Harrison MS, Pasha O, Saleem S et al (2017) A prospective study of maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes in the setting of caesarean section in low- and middle-income countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 96:410–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13098
Herstad L, Klungsøyr K, Skjærven R et al (2016) Elective caesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 16:230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1028-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ariffin, A.C., Ngadiron, H. Important Research Elements in Aiding Training. World J Surg 42, 1909–1910 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4348-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4348-1