Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical Outcomes of Gastric Cancer Patients Who Underwent Proximal or Total Gastrectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) are used to treat upper-third early gastric cancer. To date, no consensus has been reached regarding which procedure should be selected. The aim of this study was to validate the usefulness of preserving the stomach in early upper-third gastric cancer.

Methods

Between 2004 and 2013, 201 patients underwent PG or TG at our institution for treatment of upper-third early gastric cancer. According to the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 192 cases were enrolled in this study. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to compare the outcomes between the two groups.

Results

The operation time was shorter in the PG group. Although no significant difference was observed, the PG group had less bleeding and fewer postoperative complications. R0 resection rate was 100%, and no surgery-related deaths were observed. The frequencies of reflux symptoms and anastomotic stenosis were significantly higher in the PG group, but could be controlled by balloon dilation and drug therapy. The maintenance rates of body mass index and lean body mass were significantly higher in patients who underwent PG than TG. The total protein and serum albumin values were higher in the PG group than in the TG group and remained statistically superior.

Conclusion

PG group exhibited better perioperative performance. Furthermore, better nutritional results were obtained in the PG group. Although the late stenosis and reflux symptoms must be addressed, the PG is a preferable surgical procedure for the treatment of early proximal gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359–E386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL et al (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dassen AE, Lemmens VE, van de Poll-Franse LV et al (2010) Trends in incidence, treatment and survival of gastric adenocarcinoma between 1990 and 2007: a population-based study in the Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 46:1101–1110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kusano C, Gotoda T, Khor CJ et al (2008) Changing trends in the proportion of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction in a large tertiary referral center in Japan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:1662–1665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Steevens J, Botterweck AA, Dirx MJ et al (2010) Trends in incidence of oesophageal and stomach cancer subtypes in Europe. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:669–678

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu H, Rusiecki JA, Zhu K et al (2009) Stomach carcinoma incidence patterns in the United States by histologic type and anatomic site. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cospons Am Soc Prev Oncol 18:1945–1952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamashita H, Katai H, Morita S et al (2011) Optimal extent of lymph node dissection for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction carcinoma. Ann Surg 254:274–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crew KD, Neugut AI (2006) Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 12:354–362

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Deans C, Yeo MS, Soe MY et al (2011) Cancer of the gastric cardia is rising in incidence in an Asian population and is associated with adverse outcome. World J Surg 35:617–624. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0935-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shang J, Pena AS (2005) Multidisciplinary approach to understand the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 11:4131–4139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ooki A, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S et al (2008) Clinical significance of total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 28:2875–2883

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Katai H, Morita S, Saka M et al (2010) Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for suspected early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg 97:558–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Kubota T et al (2014) Long-term outcomes of patients who underwent limited proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 17:141–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. An JY, Youn HG, Choi MG et al (2008) The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cancer. Am J Surg 196:587–591. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huh YJ, Lee HJ, Oh SY et al (2015) Clinical outcome of modified laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy compared to conventional proximal gastrectomy or total gastrectomy for upper-third early gastric cancer with special references to postoperative reflux esophagitis. J Gastric Cancer 15:191–200

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ikeguchi M, Kader A, Takaya S et al (2012) Prognosis of patients with gastric cancer who underwent proximal gastrectomy. Int Surg 97:275–279

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kondoh Y, Okamoto Y, Morita M et al (2007) Clinical outcome of proximal gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 32:48–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shiraishi N, Adachi Y, Kitano S et al (2002) Clinical outcome of proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer. World J Surg 26:1150–1154. doi:10.1007/s00268-002-6369-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46:399–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Y, Cai H, Li C et al (2013) Optimal caliper width for propensity score matching of three treatment groups: a Monte Carlo study. PLoS ONE 8:e81045

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL et al (1996) The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 111:85–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Visick AH (1948) Measured radical gastrectomy; review of 505 operations for peptic ulcer. Lancet 1:551–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deurenberg P, Weststrate JA, Seidell JC (1991) Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulas. Br J Nutr 65:105–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wen L, Chen XZ, Wu B et al (2012) Total vs. proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 59:633–640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Masuzawa T, Takiguchi S, Hirao M et al (2014) Comparison of perioperative and long-term outcomes of total and proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective study. World J Surg 38:1100–1106. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2370-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hsu CP, Chen CY, Hsieh YH et al (1997) Esophageal reflux after total or proximal gastrectomy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia. Am J Gastroenterol 92:1347–1350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Akarsu C, Unsal MG, Dural AC et al (2015) Endoscopic balloon dilatation as an effective treatment for lower and upper benign gastrointestinal system anastomotic stenosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:138–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee HJ, Park W, Lee H et al (2014) Endoscopy-guided balloon dilation of benign anastomotic strictures after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gut Liver 8:394–399

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ryan AM, Healy LA, Power DG et al (2007) Short-term nutritional implications of total gastrectomy for malignancy, and the impact of parenteral nutritional support. Clin Nutr 26:718–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Aoyama T, Kawabe T, Fujikawa H et al (2015) Loss of lean body mass as an independent risk factor for continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:2560–2566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Aoyama T, Sato T, Segami K et al (2016) Risk factors for the loss of lean body mass after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1963–1970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Son MW, Kim YJ, Jeong GA et al (2014) Long-term outcomes of proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer 14:246–251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiyuki Fujiwara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Drs. Yuki Ushimaru, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara, Yuji Shishido, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Jeong-Ho Moon, Keijiro Sugimura, Takeshi Omori, Hiroshi Miyata, and Masahiko Yano have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ushimaru, Y., Fujiwara, Y., Shishido, Y. et al. Clinical Outcomes of Gastric Cancer Patients Who Underwent Proximal or Total Gastrectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. World J Surg 42, 1477–1484 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4306-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4306-y

Navigation