World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 1523–1535 | Cite as

Is Routine Intraoperative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Useful During Whole Liver Transplantation?

  • Nicolas Golse
  • Simone Santoni
  • Vincent Karam
  • Oriana Ciacio
  • Gabriella Pittau
  • Marc-Antoine Allard
  • Daniel Cherqui
  • Antonio Sa Cunha
  • René Adam
  • Denis Castaing
  • Eric Vibert
Original Scientific Report



Vascular complications following liver transplantation (LT) may result from technical deficiencies. Intraoperative diagnosis remains challenging but can prevent serious delayed complications. Intraoperative Doppler ultrasonography (IOUS) represents the gold standard for imaging, although it requires radiological skills. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has been reported during postoperative assessments, but never intraoperatively (CE-IOUS). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of routine CE-IOUS, to evaluate its impact on surgical strategy and its usefulness.


All 553 whole LTs performed in our tertiary centre between 01/2010 and 12/2014 were reviewed. We compared perioperative outcomes and long-term survival in IOUS (n = 370) versus CE-IOUS (n = 103) groups. Secondarily, the seven cases where the two imaging findings conflicted (CE+ Group) were matched 1:2 and compared with an exclusively IOUS procedure (CE− Group, n = 14) to assess the consequences of a specific CE-guided strategy.


CE-IOUS assessments were successful in 100% of cases, without any adverse effects. Vascular complications and patient/graft survival rates were identical in the IOUS and CE-IOUS groups (p = 0.65, 0.95 and 0.86, respectively). CE-IOUS confirmed IOUS findings in 93% of cases (n = 96) and led to the realization of an additional procedure (median arcuate ligament lysis) and six conservative strategies despite poor arterial (n = 5) or venous flow (n = 1) under Doppler analysis. The CE+ and CE− groups presented statistically identical perioperative and long-term outcomes.


This study demonstrated the feasibility of CE-IOUS during whole LT. However, we failed to demonstrate any advantages of CE-IOUS over IOUS. Therefore, IOUS currently remains the gold-standard imaging technique for the intraoperative assessment of vascular patency.



Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasonography


Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography


Comprehensive Complication Index


Common hepatic artery


Gastroduodenal artery


Hepatic artery


Hepatic artery stenosis


Hepatic artery thrombosis


Intensive care unit


Intraoperative Doppler ultrasonography


Liver transplantation


Postoperative day


Portal vein thrombosis


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Piardi T, Lhuaire M, Bruno O, Memeo R, Pessaux P, Kianmanesh R et al (2016) Vascular complications following liver transplantation: a literature review of advances in 2015. WJH 8(1):36–57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pulitano C, Joseph D, Sandroussi C, Verran D, Strasser SI, Shackel NA et al (2015) Hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation: is endovascular treatment always necessary? Liver Transplant 21(2):162–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tayar C, Kluger MD, Laurent A, Cherqui D (2011) Optimizing outflow in piggyback liver transplantation without caval occlusion: the three-vein technique. Liver Transplant 17(1):88–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luo Y, Fan Y-T, Lu Q, Li B, Wen T-F, Zhang Z-W (2009) CEUS: a new imaging approach for postoperative vascular complications after right-lobe LDLT. World J Gastroenterol 15(29):3670–3675CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khorsandi SE, Athale A, Vilca-Melendez H, Jassem W, Prachalias A, Srinivasan P et al (2015) Presentation, diagnosis, and management of early hepatic venous outflow complications in whole cadaveric liver transplant. Liver Transplant 21(7):914–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hom BK, Shrestha R, Palmer SL, Katz MD, Selby RR, Asatryan Z et al (2006) Prospective evaluation of vascular complications after liver transplantation: comparison of conventional and microbubble contrast-enhanced US. Radiology 241(1):267–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hwang HJ, Kim KW, Jeong WK, Kim SY, Song G-W, Hwang S et al (2009) Hepatic outflow obstruction at middle hepatic vein tributaries or inferior right hepatic veins after living donor liver transplantation with modified right lobe graft: comparison of CT and Doppler ultrasound. Am J Roentgenol 193(3):745–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi JY, Lee JY, Lee JM, Kim SH, Lee MW, Han JK et al (2007) Routine intraoperative Doppler sonography in the evaluation of complications after living-related donor liver transplantation. J Clin Ultrasound 35(9):483–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI, Cosgrove DO, Kudo M, Nolsøe CP et al (2013) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver–update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall Med 34(1):11–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lencioni R (2005) European federation of societies for ultrasound in medicine and biology (EFSUMB) guidelines for the use of contrast agents in liver ultrasound: what is the impact in clinical practice? Eur Radiol 15(Suppl 5):E98–E103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zheng R-Q, Chen G-H, Xu E-J, Mao R, Lu M-Q, Liao M et al (2010) Evaluating biliary anatomy and variations in living liver donors by a new technique: three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonic cholangiography. Ultrasound Med Biol 36(8):1282–1287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu E-J, Mao R, Zheng R-Q, Lu M-Q, Liao M, Ren J et al (2009) Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonic cholangiography: a new technique for delineation of the biliary tract in a liver donor. Liver Transplant 15(9):1154–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim KW, Kim PN, Shin JH, Shin DH, Jeong WK, Won HJ et al (2011) Acute outflow obstruction of hepatic veins in rabbits: quantitative analysis of hepatic perfusion with contrast-enhanced sonography. J Ultrasound Med 30(5):635–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berstad AE, Brabrand K, Foss A (2009) Clinical utility of microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic artery occlusion after liver transplantation. Transpl Int 22(10):954–960CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clevert DA, Stickel M, Minaifar N, Löhe F, Graeb C, Jauch KW et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in liver transplant: first results and potential for complications in the postoperative period. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 43(1–2):83–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ko G-Y, Sung K-B, Yoon H-K, Kim KR, Kim JH, Gwon DI et al (2008) Early posttransplant hepatic venous outflow obstruction: long-term efficacy of primary stent placement. Liver Transplant 14(10):1505–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    García-Criado Á, Gilabert R, Bianchi L, Vilana R, Burrel M, Barrufet M et al (2015) Impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the study of hepatic artery hypoperfusion shortly after liver transplantation: contribution to the diagnosis of artery steal syndrome. Eur Radiol 25(1):196–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rennert J, Dornia C, Georgieva M, Roehrl S, Fellner C, Schleder S et al (2012) Identification of early complications following liver transplantation using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). First results. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 21(4):407–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ikegami T, Hashikura Y, Nakazawa Y, Urata K, Mita A, Ohno Y et al (2006) Risk factors contributing to hepatic artery thrombosis following living-donor liver transplantation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 13(2):105–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dutkowski P, Oberkofler CE, Slankamenac K, Puhan MA, Schadde E, Mullhaupt B et al (2011) Are there better guidelines for allocation in liver transplantation? Ann Surg 254(5):745–754CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Halldorson JB, Bakthavatsalam R, Fix O, Reyes JD, Perkins JD (2009) D-MELD, a simple predictor of post liver transplant mortality for optimization of donor/recipient matching. Am J Transplant 9(2):318–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Warner P, Fusai G, Glantzounis GK, Sabin CA, Rolando N, Patch D et al (2011) Risk factors associated with early hepatic artery thrombosis after orthotopic liver transplantation—univariable and multivariable analysis. Transpl Int 24(4):401–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bismuth H, Chiche L, Adam R, Castaing D, Diamond T, Dennison A (1993) Liver resection versus transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients. Ann Surg 218(2):145–151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Azoulay D, Samuel D, Castaing D, Adam R, Adams D, Said G et al (1999) Domino liver transplants for metabolic disorders: experience with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. J Am Coll Surg 189(6):584–593CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Golse N, Bucur PO, Faitot F, Bekheit M, Pittau G, Ciacio O et al (2015) Spontaneous splenorenal shunt in liver transplantation: results of left renal vein ligation versus renoportal anastomosis. Transplantation 99(12):2576–2585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hirota M, Kaneko T, Sugimoto H, Kure S, Inoue S, Takeda S et al (2005) Intrahepatic circulatory time analysis of an ultrasound contrast agent in liver cirrhosis. Liver Int 25(2):337–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sidhu PS, Shaw AS, Ellis SM, Karani JB, Ryan SM (2004) Microbubble ultrasound contrast in the assessment of hepatic artery patency following liver transplantation: role in reducing frequency of hepatic artery arteriography. Eur Radiol 14(1):21–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Berry JD, Sidhu PS (2004) Microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound in liver transplantation. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 8):P96–P103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee SJ, Kim KW, Kim SY, Park YS, Lee J, Kim HJ et al (2013) Contrast-enhanced sonography for screening of vascular complication in recipients following living donor liver transplantation. J Clin Ultrasound 41(5):305–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lu Q, Zhong XF, Huang ZX, Yu BY, Ma BY, Ling WW et al (2012) Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in decision support for diagnosis and treatment of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation. Eur J Radiol 81(3):e338–e343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Memeo R, Ciacio O, Pittau G, Cherqui D, Castaing D, Adam R et al (2014) Systematic computer tomographic scans 7 days after liver transplantation surgery can lower rates of repeat-transplantation due to arterial complications. Transplant Proc 46(10):3536–3542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rajakannu M, Awad S, Ciacio O, Pittau G, Adam R, Sa Cunha A et al (2016) Intention-to-treat analysis of percutaneous endovascular treatment of hepatic artery stenosis after orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Transplant 22(7):923–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vivarelli M, La Barba G, Cucchetti A, Lauro A, Del Gaudio M, Ravaioli M et al (2007) Can antiplatelet prophylaxis reduce the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation? Liver Transplant 13(5):651–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Traynor O, Castaing D, Bismuth H (1988) Peroperative ultrasonography in the surgery of hepatic tumours. Br J Surg 75(3):197–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ren J, Wu T, Zheng B-W, Tan Y-Y, Zheng R-Q, Chen G-H (2016) Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after liver transplantation: current status and perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 22(4):1607–1616CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zheng R-Q, Mao R, Ren J, Xu E-J, Liao M, Wang P et al (2010) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation: potential role in changing the clinical algorithm. Liver Transplant 16(6):729–735Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Park YS, Kim KW, Lee SJ, Lee J, Jung D-H, Song G-W et al (2011) Hepatic arterial stenosis assessed with doppler US after liver transplantation: frequent false-positive diagnoses with tardus parvus waveform and value of adding optimal peak systolic velocity cutoff. Radiology 260(3):884–891CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pastacaldi S, Teixeira R, Montalto P, Rolles K, Burroughs AK (2001) Hepatic artery thrombosis after orthotopic liver transplantation: a review of nonsurgical causes. Liver Transplant 7(2):75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yang Y, Zhao J-C, Yan L-N, Ma Y-K, Huang B, Yuan D et al (2014) Risk factors associated with early and late HAT after adult liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 20(30):10545–10552CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Golse
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Simone Santoni
    • 1
  • Vincent Karam
    • 1
  • Oriana Ciacio
    • 1
  • Gabriella Pittau
    • 1
  • Marc-Antoine Allard
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Daniel Cherqui
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Antonio Sa Cunha
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • René Adam
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Denis Castaing
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Eric Vibert
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.AP-HP Hôpital Paul-BrousseCentre Hépato-BiliaireVillejuif CedexFrance
  2. 2.Inserm, Unité 785VillejuifFrance
  3. 3.Univ Paris-Sud, UMR-S 785VillejuifFrance
  4. 4.DHU HepatinovVillejuifFrance
  5. 5.Inserm, Unité 935VillejuifFrance
  6. 6.Univ Paris-Sud, UMR-S 935VillejuifFrance

Personalised recommendations