Skip to main content

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Malnourished Patients After Laparoscopic or Open Radical Gastrectomy

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of malnourished gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic or open radical gastrectomy.

Background

Preoperative malnutrition is an independent risk factor for postoperative mortality and morbidity in major gastrointestinal surgery. However, whether laparoscopic surgery can improve the short- and long-term outcomes of malnourished gastric cancer patients has not been determined.

Methods

We reviewed prospectively collected data from 2441 patients with gastric cancer between January 2009 and December 2014 and compared the short- and long-term outcomes in malnourished gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic or open radical gastrectomy. Nutritional risk factors included weight loss >10% within 6 months, body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, Subjective Global Assessment Grade C, and serum albumin <3.0 g/dL.

Results

Overall, 501 patients (20.52%) were classified as malnourished. Patients with gastric stump carcinoma, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, distant metastases, palliative operation, or the presence of other malignancies were excluded. Finally, a total of 412 patients were analyzed; 304 in the laparoscopic group and 108 in the open group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the clinicopathological characteristics. However, the operation time (181 ± 53 vs. 253 ± 81 min), intraoperative blood loss (80 ± 116 vs. 322 ± 502 mL), time to first ambulation (2.21 ± 1.04 vs. 2.55 ± 1.50 days), liquid diet (4.91 ± 1.61 vs. 5.72 ± 2.09 days) and semiliquid diet (7.67 ± 1.56 vs. 9.53 ± 2.09 days) as well as the postoperative hospital stay duration (13.00 ± 6.56 vs. 15.22 ± 6.87 days) were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than those in the open group (p < 0.05). The instances of overall complications (laparoscopic vs. open: 18.4 vs. 30.6%, p = 0.008) and pneumonia (laparoscopic vs. open: 10.9 vs. 19.4%, p = 0.023) were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group. With a median follow-up of 31.0 months (range 1.0–88.0), the 3-year overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates for the entire cohort were 58.9, 54.0 and 63.0%, respectively. Further analysis showed that the OS (57.5 vs. 59.4%, p = 0.560), RFS (51.8 vs. 54.8%, p = 0.441) and CSS (62.8 vs. 63.0%, p = 0.789) between the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively, were no significantly different. Further analysis showed no significant differences in the OS rates of the two groups of patients stratified by tumor stage (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with open radical gastrectomy, laparoscopy would reduce the postoperative complications especially pneumonia and shorten the postoperative hospital stay for patients with preoperative malnutrition without affecting their long-term survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Karimi P, Islami F, Anandasabapathy S, Freedman ND, Kamangar F (2014) Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23:700–713

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hébuterne X, Lemarié E, Michallet M, de Montreuil CB, Schneider SM, Goldwasser F (2014) Prevalence of malnutrition and current use of nutrition support in patients with cancer. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 38:196–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. ASPEN Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines Task Force (2002) Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 26(1 Suppl):1SA–138SA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Villet S, Chiolero RL, Bollmann MD, Revelly JP, Cayeux RNMC, Delarue J, Berger MM (2005) Negative impact of hypocaloric feeding and energy balance on clinical outcome in ICU patients. Clin Nutr 24:502–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaloga GP (2006) Parenteral nutrition in adult inpatients with functioning gastrointestinal tracts: assessment of outcomes. Lancet 367:1101–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilmore DW (1991) Catabolic illness. Strategies for enhancing recovery. N Engl J Med 325:695–702

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin CM, Doig GS, Heyland DK, Morrison T, Sibbald WJ, Southwestern Ontario Critical Care Research Network (2004) Multicentre, cluster-randomized clinical trial of algorithms for critical-care enteral and parenteral therapy (ACCEPT). CMAJ 170:197–204

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Doig GS, Simpson F, Finfer S, Delaney A, Davies AR, Mitchell I, Dobb G, Nutrition Guidelines Investigators of the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group (2008) Effect of evidence-based feeding guidelines on mortality of critically ill adults: a cluster randomized controlled trial. JAMA 300:2731–2741

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandström R, Drott C, Hyltander A, Arfvidsson B, Scherstén T, Wickström I, Lundholm K (1993) The effect of postoperative intravenous feeding (TPN) on outcome following major surgery evaluated in a randomized study. Ann Surg 217:185–195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Singer P, Berger MM, Van den Berghe G, Biolo G, Calder P, Forbes A, Griffiths R, Kreyman G, Leverve X, Pichard C, Espen (2009) ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr 28:387–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Brien JM, Phillips GS, Ali NA, Lucarelli M, Marsh CB, Lemeshow S (2006) Body mass index is independently associated with hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated adults with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 34:738–744

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider SM, Veyres P, Pivot X, Soummer AM, Jambou P, Filippi J, van Obberghen E, Hébuterne X (2004) Malnutrition is an independent factor associated with nosocomial infections. Br J Nutr 92:105–111

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu J et al (2015) Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19(11):1949–1957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Biondi A, Hyung WJ (2011) Seventh edition of TNM classification for gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4338–4339; author reply 4340-2

  16. Baker JP, Detsky AS, Wesson DE, Wolman SL, Stewart S, Whitewell J, Langer B, Jeejeebhoy KN (1982) Nutritional assessment: a comparison of clinical judgement and objective measurements. N Engl J Med 306:969–972

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, DGEM (German Society for Nutritional Medicine, Jauch KW, Kemen M, Hiesmayr JM, Horbach T, Kuse ER, Vestweber KH, ESPEN (European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition) (2006) ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: surgery including organ transplantation. Clin Nutr 25:224–244

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jung MR, Park YK, Seon JW et al (2012) Definition and classification of complications of gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on the accordion severity grading system. World J Surg 36:2400–2411. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1693-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G et al (2001) Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1157–1168

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Orsenigo E, Bissolati M, Socci C et al (2014) Duodenal stump fistula after gastric surgery for malignancies: a retrospective analysis of risk factors in a single centre experience. Gastric Cancer 17:733–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ et al (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Assumpcao L, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL et al (2008) Incidence and management of chyle leaks following pancreatic resection: a high volume single-center institutional experience. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1915–1923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Holte K, Kehlet H (2000) Postoperative ileus: a preventable event. Br J Surg 87:1480–1493

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Arozullah AM, Khuri SF, Henderson WG et al (2001) Participants in the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement P. Development and validation of a multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative pneumonia after major noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 135:847–857

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kubota T et al (2014) Prognostic significance of complications after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):891–898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee JH, Park DJ, Kim HH, Lee HJ, Yang HK (2012) Comparison of complications after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the Clavien–Dindo classification. Surg Endosc 26:1287–1295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mizuno A, Kanda M, Kobayashi D, Tanaka C, Iwata N, Yamada S, Fujii T, Nakayama G, Sugimoto H, Koike M, Fujiwara M, Kodera Y (2016) Adverse effects of intraoperative blood loss on long-term outcomes after curative gastrectomy of patients with stage II/III gastric cancer. Dig Surg 33:121–128

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bistrian BR, Blackburn GL, Vitale J, Cochran D, Naylor J (1976) Prevalence of malnutrition in general medical patients. JAMA 235:1567–1570

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Caccialanza R, Klersy C, Cereda E, Cameletti B, Bonoldi A, Bonardi C, Marinelli M, Dionigi P (2010) Nutritional parameters associated with prolonged hospital stay among ambulatory adult patients. CMAJ 182:1843–1849

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ, Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263:28–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Xue Y, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Chen P, Liu H, Zheng C, Liu F, Yu J, Li Z (2016) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1350–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee JH, Nam BH, Ryu KW, Ryu SY, Park YK, Kim S, Kim YW (2015) Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 102:1500–1505

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Fujian Medical University Union Hospital for their management of our gastric cancer patient database.

Funding

The study was sponsored by the National Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction Program of China (No. [2012]649) and the Key Projects of Science and Technology Plan of Fujian Province (No. 2014Y0025).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors participated in interpreting the data, drafting the article, critically revising the paper for content, and providing final approval of the version submitted for publication. All the authors have seen, approved, and are completely familiar with the contents of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang-Ming Huang.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

All the authors are responsible for the accuracy of the manuscript, including the statistical calculations. The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, HL., Lu, J., Zheng, CH. et al. Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Malnourished Patients After Laparoscopic or Open Radical Gastrectomy. World J Surg 42, 195–203 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4138-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4138-9