Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Limited Value of Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT in Routine Screening of Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Routine screening is recommended for patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) to enable early detection and treatment of associated neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). Gallium68-DOTATOC-Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT) is a very sensitive and specific imaging technique for the detection of sporadic neuroendocrine tumors. The present study evaluated the value of Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT in routine screening of patients with MEN1.

Methods

Between January 2014 and March 2016, all MEN1 patients underwent Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT in addition to conventional imaging (computed tomography of the thorax, magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pituitary, endoscopic ultrasonography). The diagnostic yield of conventional imaging and Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT was prospectively documented and compared, and treatment changes caused by the addition of Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT were recorded.

Results

Conventional imaging detected 145 NENs, mainly pancreaticoduodenal NENs (n = 117, 81%), in 31 of 33 MEN1 patients. Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT detected 55 NENs in 23 of the 33 patients (p = 0.0001). Ninety (62%) NENs detected by conventional imaging were missed by DOTATOC-PET-CT. The majority of missed lesions were pNEN (n = 68; 74%). The sensitivity of Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT for NENs <5, 5–9, 10–19 and ≥20 mm was 0, 29, 81 and 100%, respectively. However, Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT detected more liver and lymph node metastases in patients with known metastatic disease, which did not lead to a change of patients’ management. In one patient (3%), Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT was the only imaging modality that detected a small intestine NEN and led to potentially curative surgery.

Conclusion

Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT cannot be recommended for routine screening of MEN1 patients. It might provide important additional information in patients with suspected or known metastatic disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wermer P (1954) Genetic aspects of adenomatosis of endocrine glands. Am J Med 16:363–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trump D, Farren B, Wooding C et al (1996) Clinical studies of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). QJM 89:653–669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goudet P, Murat A, Binquet C et al (2010) Risk factors and causes of death in MEN1 disease. A GTE (Groupe d’Etude des Tumeurs Endocrines) cohort study among 758 patients. World J Surg 34:249–255. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0290-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Triponez F, Dosseh D, Goudet P et al (2006) Epidemiology data on 108 MEN 1 patients from the GTE with isolated nonfunctioning tumors of the pancreas. Ann Surg 243:265–272

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Thakker RV, Newey PJ, Walls GV et al (2012) Clinical practice guidelines for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:2990–3011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vinik AI, Woltering EA, Warner RR et al (2010) NANETS consensus guidelines for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas 39:713–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Otte A, Jermann E, Behe M et al (1997) DOTATOC: a powerful new tool for receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy. Eur J Nucl Med 24:792–795

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Essen M, Sundin A, Krenning EP et al (2014) Neuroendocrine tumours: the role of imaging for diagnosis and therapy. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10:102–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reubi JC, Schar JC, Waser B et al (2000) Affinity profiles for human somatostatin receptor subtypes SST1-SST5 of somatostatin radiotracers selected for scintigraphic and radiotherapeutic use. Eur J Nucl Med 27:273–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heppeler A, Froidevaux S, Macke HR et al (1999) Radiometal-labelled macrocyclic chelator-derivatised somatostatin analogue with superb tumour-targeting properties and potential for receptor-mediated internal radiotherapy. Chem Eur J 5:1974–1981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Henze M, Schuhmacher J, Hipp P et al (2001) PET imaging of somatostatin receptors using [68GA]DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide: first results in patients with meningiomas. J Nucl Med 42:1053–1056

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang J, Kan Y, Ge BH et al (2014) Diagnostic role of Gallium-68 DOTATOC and Gallium-68 DOTATATE PET in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis. Acta Radiol 55:389–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ambrosini V, Campana D, Bodei L et al (2010) 68 Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT clinical impact in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med 51:669–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sundin A, Garske U, Orlefors H (2007) Nuclear imaging of neuroendocrine tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 21:69–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sadowski SM, Millo C, Cottle-Delisle C et al (2015) Results of (68)Gallium-DOTATATE PET/CT scanning in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia Type 1. J Am Coll Surg 221:509–517

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lastoria S, Marciello F, Faggiano A et al (2016) Role of Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Endocrine 52:488–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Froeling V, Elgeti F, Maurer MH et al (2012) Impact of Ga-68 DOTATOC PET/CT on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia. Ann Nucl Med 26:738–743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morgat C, Velayoudom-Cephise FL, Schwartz P et al (2016) Evaluation of Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT for the detection of duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in patients with MEN1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43:1258–1266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma P, Mukherjee A, Karunanithi S et al (2015) Accuracy of 68 Ga DOTANOC PET/CT imaging in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes. Clin Nucl Med 40:351–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lopez CL, Waldmann J, Fendrich V et al (2011) Long-term results of surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in patients with MEN1. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:1187–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Waldmann J, Fendrich V, Habbe N et al (2009) Screening of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1): a critical analysis of its value. World J Surg 33:1208–1218. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-9983-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kann PH, Kann B, Fassbender WJ et al (2006) Small neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1): least significant change of tumor diameter as determined by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) imaging. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 114:361–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ito T, Jensen RT (2016) Imaging in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: recent studies show enhanced sensitivities but increased controversies. Int J Endocr Oncol 3:53–66

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kroiss A, Putzer D, Decristoforo C et al (2013) 68 Ga-DOTA-TOC uptake in neuroendocrine tumour and healthy tissue: differentiation of physiological uptake and pathological processes in PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40:514–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Partelli S, Tamburrino D, Lopez C et al (2016) Active surveillance versus surgery of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms ≤2 cm in MEN1 patients. Neuroendocrinology 103:779–786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scarsbrook AF, Thakker RV, Wass JA et al (2006) Multiple endocrine neoplasia: spectrum of radiologic appearances and discussion of a multitechnique imaging approach. Radiographics 26:433–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all patients who participated in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max B. Albers.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors state no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albers, M.B., Librizzi, D., Lopez, C.L. et al. Limited Value of Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT in Routine Screening of Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1. World J Surg 41, 1521–1527 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3907-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3907-9

Keywords

Navigation