Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of Life and Medico-Legal Implications Following Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injuries

  • Scientific Review
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this review we aimed to evaluate quality of life after bile duct injury and the consequent medico-legal implications. A comprehensive English language literature search was performed on MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index and Google™ Scholar databases for articles published between January 2000 and April 2016. The last date of search was 11 April 2016. Key search words included bile duct injury, iatrogenic, cholecystectomy, prevention, risks, outcomes, quality of life, litigation and were used in combination with the Boolean operators AND, OR and NOT. Long-term survival after bile duct injury is significantly impaired (all-cause long-term mortality approximately 21 %) along with the quality of life (especially psychological/mental state remains affected). Bile duct injury is associated with high rates of litigation. Monetary compensation varied from £2500 to £216,000 in the UK, €9826–€55,301 in the Netherlands and $628,138–$2,891,421 in the USA. Bile duct injuries have profound implications for patients, medical personnel and healthcare providers as they cause significant morbidity and mortality, high rates of litigation and raised healthcare expenditure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006231

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lau WY, Lai EC, Lau SH (2010) Management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review. ANZ J Surg 80(1–2):75–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tornqvist B, Stromberg C, Persson G, Nilsson M (2012) Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ 345:e6457

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Halbert C, Altieri MS, Yang J et al (2016) Long-term outcomes of patients with common bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-016-4745-9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roy PG, Soonawalla ZF, Grant HW (2009) Medicolegal costs of bile duct injuries incurred during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford) 11(2):130–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C, Dellinger EP, Chan L (2003) Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 290(16):2168–2173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Waage A, Nilsson M (2006) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg 141(12):1207–1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I et al (2005) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 140(10):986–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Massarweh NN, Devlin A, Symons RG, Broeckel Elrod JA, Flum DR (2009) Risk tolerance and bile duct injury: surgeon characteristics, risk-taking preference, and common bile duct injuries. J Am Coll Surg 209(1):17–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Humes DJ, Ahmed I, Lobo DN (2010) The pedicle effect and direct coupling: delayed thermal injuries to the bile duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 145(1):96–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dekker SW, Hugh TB (2008) Laparoscopic bile duct injury: understanding the psychology and heuristics of the error. ANZ J Surg 78(12):1109–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hugh TB (2002) Laparoscopic bile duct injury: some myths. ANZ J Surg 72(2):164–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Strasberg SM, Eagon CJ, Drebin JA (2000) The “hidden cystic duct” syndrome and the infundibular technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy—the danger of the false infundibulum. J Am Coll Surg 191(6):661–667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211(1):132–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flum DR, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, Chan L, Koepsell T (2003) Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 289(13):1639–1644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Massarweh NN, Flum DR (2007) Role of intraoperative cholangiography in avoiding bile duct injury. J Am Coll Surg 204(4):656–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Törnqvist B, Strömberg C, Akre O, Enochsson L, Nilsson M (2015) Selective intraoperative cholangiography and risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 102(8):952–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sheffield KM, Riall TS, Han Y, Kuo YF, Townsend CM Jr, Goodwin JS (2013) Association between cholecystectomy with vs without intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common duct injury. JAMA 310(8):812–820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanjay P, Kulli C, Polignano FM, Tait IS (2010) Optimal surgical technique, use of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC), and management of acute gallbladder disease: the results of a nation-wide survey in the UK and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92(4):302–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sicklick JK, Camp MS, Lillemoe KD et al (2005) Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: perioperative results in 200 patients. Ann Surg 241(5):786–792 (discussion 793–795)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart L, Way LW (2009) Laparoscopic bile duct injuries: timing of surgical repair does not influence success rate. A multivariate analysis of factors influencing surgical outcomes. HPB (Oxford) 11(6):516–522

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walsh RM, Henderson JM, Vogt DP, Brown N (2007) Long-term outcome of biliary reconstruction for bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surgery 142(4):450–456 (discussion 456–457)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. AbdelRafee A, El-Shobari M, Askar W, Sultan AM, El Nakeeb A (2015) Long-term follow-up of 120 patients after hepaticojejunostomy for treatment of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 18:205–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barbier L, Souche R, Slim K, Ah-Soune P (2014) Long-term consequences of bile duct injury after cholecystectomy. J Visc Surg 151(4):269–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC et al (2001) Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis. Ann Surg 234(6):750–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Melton GB, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Sauter PA, Coleman J, Yeo CJ (2002) Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life. Ann Surg 235(6):888–895

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Moore DE, Feurer ID, Holzman MD et al (2004) Long-term detrimental effect of bile duct injury on health-related quality of life. Arch Surg 139(5):476–481 (discussion 481–482)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sarmiento JM, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM, Hodge DO, Harrington JR (2004) Quality-of-life assessment of surgical reconstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy-induced bile duct injuries: what happens at 5 years and beyond? Arch Surg 139(5):483–488 (discussion 488–489)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hogan AM, Hoti E, Winter DC et al (2009) Quality of life after iatrogenic bile duct injury: a case control study. Ann Surg 249(2):292–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Reuver PR, Sprangers MA, Rauws EA et al (2008) Impact of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy on quality of life: a longitudinal study after multidisciplinary treatment. Endoscopy 40(8):637–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dominguez-Rosado I, Mercado MA, Kauffman C, Ramirez-del Val F, Elnecavé-Olaiz A, Zamora-Valdés D (2014) Quality of life in bile duct injury: 1-, 5-, and 10-year outcomes after surgical repair. J Gastrointest Surg 18(12):2089–2094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Kim Y et al (2014) Long-term health-related quality of life after iatrogenic bile duct injury repair. J Am Coll Surg 219(5):923–932.e10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Landman MP, Feurer ID, Moore DE, Zaydfudim V, Pinson CW (2013) The long-term effect of bile duct injuries on health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 15(4):252–259

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chandler JG, Voyles CR, Floore TL, Bartholomew LA (1997) Litigious consequences of open and laparoscopic biliary surgical mishaps. J Gastroint Surg 1(2):138–145 (discussion 145)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Alkhaffaf B, Decadt B (2010) 15 years of litigation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Ann Surg 251(4):682–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Perera MT, Silva MA, Shah AJ et al (2010) Risk factors for litigation following major transectional bile duct injury sustained at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 34(11):2635–2641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. de Reuver PR, Wind J, Cremers JE, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ (2008) Litigation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an evaluation of the Dutch arbitration system for medical malpractice. J Am Coll Surg 206(2):328–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McLean TR (2005) Monetary lessons from litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 71(7):606–612

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. General Medical Council (2015) Guidance on duty of candour 2015. https://www.gmc-uk.org/DoC_guidance_english.pdf_61618688.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2016

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    Deepak Hariharan, Emmanouil Psaltis, John H. Scholefield & Dileep N. Lobo

Authors
  1. Deepak Hariharan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emmanouil Psaltis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John H. Scholefield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dileep N. Lobo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dileep N. Lobo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has a conflict of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hariharan, D., Psaltis, E., Scholefield, J.H. et al. Quality of Life and Medico-Legal Implications Following Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injuries. World J Surg 41, 90–99 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3677-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3677-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation